It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Not Tonight is now available DRM-free on GOG.com, 10% off until August 24th, 3 PM UTC.

Great Britain isn’t so great anymore. Democracy lies in ruins. The power of the people is just a myth. You find yourself fighting to scrape by, every struggle has an end, but Not Tonight.

Not Tonight combines time management with RPG elements, all baked into a politically charged story. Your choices matter, so keep your head down and exist or fight the regime.
avatar
i_hope_you_rot: I said the game not that crap .
avatar
tinyE: I happen to have that crap wishlisted. :P

as for this game, I have to pass, because regardless of it's subtext, it's too damn smart for me. Anything more complicated than Pac Man and my brain shuts down.
The game looks quite simple after watching a video it seems to be a repetitive game, next please, id please, next and in btween you click on the counter and add some stuff, pretty much like papers please.

Anyway, 2 extremely simple games (also repetitive) are Fortix and Fortix 2 ( Steam)
Fortix is quite cheap now, i own both games and Fortix is a nice 'landgrabber' game like the old classic Stix we played on the c64 :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eva4Ji1oBM

Fortix video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pUuMnxeirE


avatar
gamesfreak64: True, many games even on steam are drm free , well in a way they are drm free cause you do need a client to get the game to download ( forced clients is a form of DRM) on the pc, and the games are not really drm free cause you will need to put some file in it, there is a topic in GOG forum that shows how it involves a text file, doesnt work for every steam game cause many games simply check for the client and if it is running.....
avatar
Telika: But even DRM-free games on Steam would be bought through the Steam account, so could be checked "connect"-like to authorise reviews on gog.com. In this context, the issue was more about other shops, that wouldn't be checked by a "reviews enabler".
Reviews enabler ? do you mean an automated reviewer? or a manual like gog has and steam has where suers can leave a review.

Games sending data without my permission are bad , even if they are 'harmless' and wont identity or link to the player, telemetry and more nonsense are things i hate, Firefox loves sending data, lucky for us we could block that in the old FF, i dont know if the latest builds allow 100% blocking of telemetry , win 10 that awful piece of spyware with a build in OS, cause thats what it is in a way, usually you have an OS that sends data but this is a spyware that has a build in OS so it can do more :D

Anyway, big brother is watching everyone, and it seems there is no escaping it cause we do need a new windows so we sheeps take all the spying for granted.
Post edited August 18, 2018 by gamesfreak64
avatar
tinyE: GOG needs to do something about people who haven't bought the game making reviews.

When I first joined here I was really really against this, but now with this and some of the stuff being put up by people who oppose visual novels, I've done a 180 here. and this really needs to be fixed.

I really like this one; he obviously didn't buy it but he uses the terms "my video games". :P
avatar
tinyE: Pretty sure the people posting those "reviews" don't own the game on Steam either.
Whoa, whoa. First - make up your mind if you want reviews only fron users, who bought the game or ones, who own it. This is not the same.

Second, the "review" on the picture you added is useless, regardless if a person who posted it bought the game or owns the game or just someone who was passing by, saw "Not tonight" and expressed own attitude. The only way to get meaningful reviews is only to delet not meaningful reviews. And that requires work of curating the reviews just like curating games.
avatar
Telika: But even DRM-free games on Steam would be bought through the Steam account, so could be checked "connect"-like to authorise reviews on gog.com. In this context, the issue was more about other shops, that wouldn't be checked by a "reviews enabler".
avatar
gamesfreak64: Reviews enabler ? do you mean an automated reviewer? or a manual like gog has and steam has where suers can leave a review.
Context of the discussion : https://www.gog.com/forum/general/release_not_tonight_514b3/post78
avatar
tinyE: Problem is we have the deal with people screaming "censorship!"
GULAG?
low rated
On 2nd thought I think I will install JerkMuter. :P
I wholeheartedly agree with GOG deleting the reviews that were posted only for political purposes, even if the game itself makes politics a major selling point.

However, I do find it somewhat disturbing that GOG seems to agree with a review that calls a vast minority of its users "Russian bots". Kinda funny coming from a reviewer called "robo" with 0 hours played and owning only 16, probably free, games. Thank you for the profiles, GOG.

Is this something that the GOG staff also believes of its customers? The review was already up before the purge, so they must've seen it.

I'm sure that's not the case, but it does leave the impression that GOG is clearly taking a side, alienating Russians & showing a certain disdain for some of its less-than-human (bots) customers.

It's all probably just a big misunderstanding. :)

EDIT: Better add some screenshots.
Attachments:
rev.jpg (77 Kb)
rob.jpg (190 Kb)
Post edited August 18, 2018 by Dalthnock
Yeah, what's up with the "An expanded Papers Please! set in the UK"-"review" still being up?

It is utterly worthless as a review, it tells me nothing about the game itself (other than it being a Papers, Please-ripoff - gee, I could've told by looking at the screenshots!) and rather than reviewing the game, robochibi concerns himself with analysis of the other "reviews" (which have been deleted anyway). Most of the anti-"reviewers" have 100+ games on their profile, robochibi has 16. Say what you will about "Russian bots", at least they're more committed to buying games here than robochibi is... :P
avatar
Dalthnock: However, I do find it somewhat disturbing that GOG seems to agree with a review that calls a vast minority of its users "Russian bots". Kinda funny coming from a reviewer called "robo" with 0 hours played and owning only 16, probably free, games. Thank you for the profiles, GOG.

Is this something that the GOG staff also believes of its customers? The review was already up before the purge, so they must've seen it.

I'm sure that's not the case, but it does leave the impression that GOG is clearly taking a side, alienating Russians & showing a certain disdain for some of its less-than-human (bots) customers.
To be honest, I didn't see that review as something alienating. Russians are blamed for many things (including Trump election) anyway. And obviously, especially considering the nickname, reviewer was just trolling.

However, deleting all "troll reviews" from the right and leaving "troll reviews" from the left to remain... yeah, it indeed looks like GOG takes a side.
avatar
LootHunter: yeah, it indeed looks like GOG takes a side.
Yeah, because that worked out exceedingly well for them last time. Heh heh.


BTW, @gogstaff: When you hover your mouse cursor over the "Store"-tab and then select "Browse all games", the picture for "All games for Mac" still has a prominent picture of FEZ on the bottom left. You might want to remove that, seeing as it's no longer available on gog.
low rated
avatar
LootHunter: Russians are blamed for many things
Well, you did hack my GTA V account yesterday, and bought a GoPro on my eBay account, a couple of months ago.

Of course I recovered the account immediately & got a complete refund, but that's beside the point. I WAS HACKED BY RUSSIA!!!

I say "you", because according to all respectable news media, Russians are all exactly the same, and completely responsible for everything one of you does. #yesallruskies

GOG agrees with this, don't you GOG? ;)
avatar
GOG.com: Release: Not Tonight
That's what she said!
avatar
Dalthnock: I wholeheartedly agree with GOG deleting the reviews that were posted only for political purposes, even if the game itself makes politics a major selling point.

However, I do find it somewhat disturbing that GOG seems to agree with a review that calls a vast minority of its users "Russian bots". Kinda funny coming from a reviewer called "robo" with 0 hours played and owning only 16, probably free, games. Thank you for the profiles, GOG.

Is this something that the GOG staff also believes of its customers? The review was already up before the purge, so they must've seen it.

I'm sure that's not the case, but it does leave the impression that GOG is clearly taking a side, alienating Russians & showing a certain disdain for some of its less-than-human (bots) customers.

It's all probably just a big misunderstanding. :)

EDIT: Better add some screenshots.
Troll/fake review are being removed. I'd invite you to stop trying to create narratives while ignoring the fact reviews are being removed when found to be false. It's the weekend, we don't have staff dedicated to spamming F5 on a review page.


Anyone who keeps ignoring the removal of false reviews as a means to preach their politics will lose their ability to post for a day or two. Be sensible.
Post edited August 18, 2018 by Linko90
avatar
Linko90: Troll/fake review are being removed. I'd invite you to stop trying to create narratives while ignoring the fact reviews are being removed when found to be false. It's the weekend, we don't have staff dedicated to spamming F5 on a review page.

Anyone who keeps ignoring the removal of false reviews as a means to preach their politics will lose their ability to post for a day or two. Be sensible.
As I said, I wholeheartedly agree with the removal of such reviews. I only found it odd to see that one still up.

It wasn't a review added after the purge, it was already there with the only other 5 star review, "An actual review of the game. by boonotakota"

The only review added AFTER the deletion was "An improvement on Papers, Please by Spikey.315", one which I quite like, myself.

Be as threatening as you want, but I'm not lying. I'm being snarky, I'm being sarcastic, yes. But I'm not lying. You know this.
avatar
Linko90: Troll/fake review are being removed. I'd invite you to stop trying to create narratives while ignoring the fact reviews are being removed when found to be false. It's the weekend, we don't have staff dedicated to spamming F5 on a review page.

Anyone who keeps ignoring the removal of false reviews as a means to preach their politics will lose their ability to post for a day or two. Be sensible.
avatar
Dalthnock: As I said, I wholeheartedly agree with the removal of such reviews. I only found it odd to see that one still up.
Not anymore. "Review" mentioning "Russian bots" now deleted.
avatar
Dalthnock: As I said, I wholeheartedly agree with the removal of such reviews. I only found it odd to see that one still up.
avatar
LootHunter: Not anymore. "Review" mentioning "Russian bots" now deleted.
I wouldn't want to push a narrative or anything, but given the timing & the fact that initially only the text was removed, it's likely that it was done by the more limited powers of Mr. 209. He may be tough, but he's completely fair.

I kinda like him, actually. I hope he won't get in trouble with any higher-ups for doing this. :)