Sabin_Stargem: Setting aside the fact that digital ladies are not actual, real-world people...
I have to say, the anti-sexuals are likely anti-lady. They keep talking about bust size or looking young - but they give the impression that they never even encountered women in real life. Some girls have robust builds, others sporty, asian, freckled, or tall. There is a fair chunk of adult women who are (not) built like Jessica Rabbit. Many ladies are adults doing mature work, be it working at McDonald's, raising their family, and generally doing stuff a mature person does, regardless of figure.
Point being, the conservatives basically are not acknowledging that a woman can be a lady interested in sex, simply because they don't have properly sized bongos, exact height, or whatever caricature the anti-sexuals have in their head. They are infantizing women, by basically saying you need to "look" adult, in order to be be an adult.
It is unfortunate that fictional depictions of women have a better grasp of their figure than purported feminists. Women come in many varieties, and that fact shouldn't be rejected by those who are supposed to help ladies.
You want to truly support women? Then aid causes that improve their lives - abortion rights, subsidize "pink" supplies, fight for parental leave, vote for genuine sex education, make contraceptives readily available, offer daycare for working parents, universal healthcare, same-sex marriage benefits, and so on.
Telling ladies that they aren't women if they aren't built "right" is stupid and evil.
That fifth paragraph got a bit political and yeah, we really can't go into that here because it starts battles. So while I agree with you on your main point, let's leave the politics out of it. Okay?