It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Get ready to determine the destiny of Rome as you conquer foreign lands and navigate political intrigue in this turn-based RPG. Expeditions: Rome is now available for pre-order on GOG.COM, enjoying a 20% discount that will last until the game’s premiere on 20th January 2022.

Share our love for games? Subscribe to our newsletter for news, releases, and exclusive discounts. Visit the “Privacy & settings” section of your GOG account to join now!
high rated
Enjoy & stay tuned! :)
Really, THQ's new releases for GOG in 2022 are much appreciated.
Thanks!
low rated
The game can already be called. "Expeditions: Woke" There were no female conscripts, so better not market this game as accurate!!! And more in the fantasy section.

I love history, but all these distortions of history for the sake of pandering points means no buy from me. This is the Total war series all over again.
Post edited December 07, 2021 by dgnfly
Adore the Expeditions series. Wishlisting this one hoping that it gets full Galaxy support.
avatar
dgnfly: The game can already be called. "Expeditions: Woke" There were no female conscripts, so better not market this game as accurate!!! And more in the fantasy section.

I love history, but all these distortions of history for the sake of pandering pints mean no buy from me. This the Total war series all over again.
Rubs me the wrong way a bit too, but as long as it can be ignored it doesn't bother me that much, to be honest.
Just go with an all male squad for the proper authentic and historically accurate experience.
low rated
avatar
dgnfly: The game can already be called. "Expeditions: Woke" There were no female conscripts, so better not market this game as accurate!!! And more in the fantasy section.

I love history, but all these distortions of history for the sake of pandering pints mean no buy from me. This the Total war series all over again.
avatar
Swedrami: Rubs me the wrong way a bit too, but as long as it can be ignored it doesn't bother me that much, to be honest.
Just go with an all male squad for the proper authentic and historically accurate experience.
If I buy this game, they will start pushing even more propaganda in the future, and they will actually distort history completely. This is like the retarded notion that Beethoven was black for the sake of pandering they are pushing that narrative, and they have been trying to do that even more these days.

The same goes for a black soldier in the Roman army. They were never legionaries but as auxiliary. Nowadays, historians are claiming that there are so many blacks that the whole of the roman world would look like how Greece did in Assassin's Creed. Even the few blacks that even got close to getting citizenship were ultra rare.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KheW7q-Bygg

Mainstream gaming has been full of that bullshit. Just look at Battlefield V the most hated battlefield and justly so.
Not only is it grossly inaccurate while claiming to be authentic, it even tries to pander by giving "The Norwegian heavy water sabotage" and then dishonoring those men by making it seem that a mother and daughter could do the same shit those commandos went through.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nxSvvA9pQ0
avatar
dgnfly: The same goes for a black soldier in the Roman army. They were never legionaries but as auxiliary. Nowadays, historians are claiming that there are so many blacks that the whole of the roman world would look like how Greece did in Assassin's Creed. Even the few blacks that even got close to getting citizenship were ultra rare.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KheW7q-Bygg
If I understand correctly, the black guy is supposed to be a gladiator...I suppose a Numidian or something of the sort. So yeah, it smacks a bit of politically correct tokenism, but it's not totally historically implausible.
However, the same can't be said for including some strong Amazon archer...Amazons are fictional, they weren't real, certainly didn't serve as bodyguards for late Republican Romans! They could have included some Gaulish or Germanic mercenary for historical plausibility, but instead they're going for fantasy nonsense.
I also don't like how they use the late Republican setting with real characters like Cato and Cicero, but apparently create an entirely fictional narrative with some super-villain invented for the game. I suspect the result will be just painful for anybody who knows and cares about the true history of the era.
So while I liked Expeditions: Conquistador (despite its historical inaccuracies), I think I'll pass up this one, since it seems to take a few too many liberties with the historical source material.
Not a criticism but an observation/feeling: the game costs more with every iteration.
Think it's a good trend, for starters.
low rated
avatar
dgnfly: The same goes for a black soldier in the Roman army. They were never legionaries but as auxiliary. Nowadays, historians are claiming that there are so many blacks that the whole of the roman world would look like how Greece did in Assassin's Creed. Even the few blacks that even got close to getting citizenship were ultra rare.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KheW7q-Bygg
avatar
morolf: If I understand correctly, the black guy is supposed to be a gladiator...I suppose a Numidian or something of the sort. So yeah, it smacks a bit of politically correct tokenism, but it's not totally historically implausible.
However, the same can't be said for including some strong Amazon archer...Amazons are fictional, they weren't real, certainly didn't serve as bodyguards for late Republican Romans! They could have included some Gaulish or Germanic mercenary for historical plausibility, but instead they're going for fantasy nonsense.
I also don't like how they use the late Republican setting with real characters like Cato and Cicero, but apparently create an entirely fictional narrative with some super-villain invented for the game. I suspect the result will be just painful for anybody who knows and cares about the true history of the era.
So while I liked Expeditions: Conquistador (despite its historical inaccuracies), I think I'll pass up this one, since it seems to take a few too many liberties with the historical source material.
The whole black soldier things was also very sketchy, seeing as it never popped up till this new pandering generation.

Remember that the media was propagandizing the Cheddar Man? He was supposed to be the first black British but turned out to be a lie that the media itself spun for the sake of tokenism. They later backtracked on it cause the scientist was stating they basically had no clue what skin color he had.

The major problem is you can't know history completely, because not everything is first-hand documentation and some things are just speculations. We know most of our information on the Gauls and Germanic tribes through Caesars accounts. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsTlb5a5LrY
Anyone else have to mute that trailer just to watch it? That music - didnt seem to match.
The first two games were great, so I'm looking forward :D

also, gog's forums are in obvious need of moderation smh
avatar
dgnfly: The game can already be called. "Expeditions: Woke" There were no female conscripts, so better not market this game as accurate!!! And more in the fantasy section.

I love history, but all these distortions of history for the sake of pandering points means no buy from me. This is the Total war series all over again.
Can we stop with this bullshit?. Its not calling itself a Roman Legionnaire simulator nor is it advertising itself as a historical accurate game. Its a fucking game mate. Live with it!!!


Personally going to get the game myself. Love the series so far!!
Post edited December 08, 2021 by Niggles
I'm sick to death of teaser trailers that have no gameplay. I don't buy games for cinematics.
avatar
Swedrami: Rubs me the wrong way a bit too, but as long as it can be ignored it doesn't bother me that much, to be honest.
Just go with an all male squad for the proper authentic and historically accurate experience.
I'm not sure you have that much freedom in selecting your squad, if I understand correctly there are certain characters you have to have in your team, and one of them is that Amazon archer.