Hum... this be the reason why I bluaady could not get unto actually snatching up Cities: Skylines earlier today in Steam?
Neither a heart-blood fan of Valve (though reluctantly and coolly politely accepting of it as of now) - or even the simulation genre - but maybe this purported 3rd party xmas shopping craze on my account could explain the lack of access... to the store.
I fully believe that Valve is pretty much a micropenis-headed sort of a corporation - but then also, selling should be their utmost priority, or not? If they had been able to sell, they would have.
I am assuming this is then some sort of a web attack on Steam.
But let me state my a priori Valve hostile position: if Steam did not serve a regrettably significant niche in the gaming market - it would not be there! And that niche is about IP, not individual gamers.
Steam seemingly does not like Win OS on Mac HW; it is a heavy and intrusive client and getting unto any sort of personalized customer support is very hard.
What I want to say: Valve is not there for its objective greatness or popularity.
But it is there, and there is a reason - and a pity such a corporation should have taken the market lead!
I see Valve a bit like Basel III requirements imposed on banks post sub-prime crash, only less dramatic for the general economy and more pronounced on the end consumer = gamer, in our case.
Do I like it, necessarily: no. Do I see the market flaw: yes.
Edit: making clearer that 1st sentence was tied to the second. I hope, lol.