BluesyMoo: Well said. It will not end here.
Yeshu: So are you gonna do anything about it or continue your crusade as a brave keyboard warrior?
Ah you poor young kids. No appreciate for history. Probably why you keep trying to line everyone else up to suffer it's repetition in your willful ignorance. The Crusades were a defensive action carried out against foreign invasion and the ongoing harassment of innocent merchants by belligerent foreign powers on purely ideological grounds. It was a time where many nations, historical enemies in most cases, banded together in defense of the innocent and towards mutual defense.
It in many ways, may have been medeival Europe's finest hour. And a rare exception in a longstanding pattern of mutual dickery the likes of which has plagued humanity from the beginning.
You keep claiming the people taking up the cause are supposedly pro censorship SJW's a claim near as I can tell, utterly without any basis whatsoever, and pretty questionable even on the people who I've had interactions with in the past who might be possibles, but let's pretend for one second you're telling the truth.
Why would I attempt to sway them from a clear understanding of the implications of allowing this to go unopposed that you have yet to even consider? Why should I condemn someone, who I legitimately disagree with on a great many points when they get it right? When they put more thought into what could happen to *them* to their games, to the books, the music, the movies, the magazines, the schools, and so much more if this continued campaign of harassment is not opposed?
Should I not acknowledge the fact that common ground, recognition of a common threat has occured? Should I not recognize that in at least one specific area, they are not my enemy? That they may even have genuinely good intentions, and are even using the appropriate methodology to redress the way CD Projekt has wronged so many out of misguided fear of a dying terrorist regime?
Oh tell me great scholar who's peach fuzz hasn't even come in yet, who lacks the doubts, the scars, and the knowledge only a lifetime of experience can offer but declares yourself psychic expert of the world before you've yet to see how it actually works content in your illusion of knowledge above all others, given the war, a war this corpse of a terrorist state you persist in defending, why shouldn't I defend my nighbor?
Why should I let them be victimized, because others are scared, or as short sighted as you? Certainly there's plenty of moral reason not to, but you're missing the pragmatic. Once you give up something to a thief or other criminal you could've defended, you send the message, it'll be even easier to get something larger the next time.
All your way is accomplishing is setting up for a much larger, uglier fight. One you won't
[get to conveniently avoid and pretend you're somehow taking a moral stand with your inaction.