It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on TV.
avatar
tinyE: I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on TV.
Better call tinyE?
avatar
Dark_Ansem: PS: I don't care about your mutual circlejerk of mobsters downvoting me.
Also, moderators, really? Are you sleeping?
1) Downvoting is not a crime (even though I prefer talking to people intead of just downvoting then) so no need for moderation here.

2) Insults are a different thing but you are the one calling others "fool" or "idiot" while others (as far as I could see) only told you the way GOG is handling things. Obviously however those insults are still in line so again: no moderation needed.
avatar
Linko90: ...
avatar
tfishell: Can you now give us a specific hour?
7 Warsaw time.
avatar
tinyE: I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on TV.
avatar
Aemenyn: Better call tinyE?
I would watch it :)
avatar
tfishell: Can you now give us a specific hour?
avatar
Linko90: 7 Warsaw time.
AM or PM?
avatar
MarkoH01: Well- you could be a laywyer but that is the way GOG is working and that is a fact!
avatar
Dark_Ansem: Key word is GOG, not Beamdog.
The only thing I ever said is that it is not GOGs decision and it never was. They have contracts and the publishers (whoever that is) decide what GOG is allowed to do in most cases.
low rated
avatar
Dark_Ansem: PS: I don't care about your mutual circlejerk of mobsters downvoting me.
Also, moderators, really? Are you sleeping?
avatar
MarkoH01: 1) Downvoting is not a crime (even though I prefer talking to people intead of just downvoting then) so no need for moderation here.

2) Insults are a different thing but you are the one calling others "fool" or "idiot" while others (as far as I could see) only told you the way GOG is handling things. Obviously however those insults are still in line so again: no moderation needed.
Incorrect: people here are slandering AND insulting BD, and their honest work, only to get cheap likes and be read. I on the other hand, have only stepped in to rectify this.
avatar
tinyE: I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on TV.
Looks like you cought a frog, when you took the dive into the lake:
https://data.whicdn.com/images/29379174/large.jpg

XD
low rated
avatar
Dark_Ansem: You know, if people talk without having a clue, name calling is deserved. Also, I do NOT tolerate ignoramuses like that posting fake news and misinformation. I dare any of you to post evidence that Beamdog unilaterally told GOG to stop selling the old classics.

What people like the above troll are doing is spreading falsehoods and hatemongering for shits and giggles.

Also, I am quite irritated by this mobster behaviour of downvoting who tells the facts and upvoting who spreads falsehoods.
avatar
paladin181: You know, I don't suffer fools kindly and I'm a bit of a dick, and I've managed to never get banned because I'm rarely downright rude to people. Name-calling isn't appropriate. Also, stop caring about the rep; the only thing it affects is your ability to post a link without putting quote tags around it. Do you think having a 1500 rep helps me? I don't care. He's not a troll. He has posted his supporting evidence, and you have posted yours .Both are quite convincing if you'd stop condescending enough to realize it. He's not wrong, and yet, neither are you because while the truth is out there, unless there's a legal investigation or release of information down the road, we'll likely never see it. All 3 parties have pointed the finger at one another. He's not spreading falsehoods anymore than you are.

My advice, which is totally unsolicited, is to calm down a little and not be so insulting to those you're trying to have a conversation with. Please.

EDIT: Well, almost 2000 rep. Who knew!! :P
And while I appreciate that, I'd like you to be as "righteous" in calling out someone slandering an innocent, until proven guilty, party. Why is there no hatred towards GOG? After all, MY evidence (which is actually made from source stuff, and not conspiracy theories) shows that the decision is joing. Why the same behaviour is acceptable if carried out by one party and despicable if coming from someone else?

I don't care about reputation itself. It DOES bother me, however, that effectively this community is prone to be fooled by Daily Mail titles instead of doing its research.
avatar
Dark_Ansem: only to get cheap likes
Do you really think that's a motivation of anyone in this thread?
It's life:
https://www.gog.com/game/neverwinter_nights_enhanced_edition_pack
avatar
Dark_Ansem: And while I appreciate that, I'd like you to be as "righteous" in calling out someone slandering an innocent, until proven guilty, party. Why is there no hatred towards GOG? After all, MY evidence (which is actually made from source stuff, and not conspiracy theories) shows that the decision is joing. Why the same behaviour is acceptable if carried out by one party and despicable if coming from someone else?

I don't care about reputation itself. It DOES bother me, however, that effectively this community is prone to be fooled by Daily Mail titles instead of doing its research.
I called you out cause you were the one flinging insults. We can get along, man. It's just a game! Unless.... do you work for Beamdog?!
He said "rectify".

Huh Huh Huh
low rated
avatar
Dark_Ansem: And, if you notice, it isn't talking about NWNEE so my point still stands. Maybe GOG could actually step in and clarify?
avatar
Aemenyn: You're not seriously suggesting that, after jointly deciding on a release plan for the BG enhanced editions, Beamdog would decide to not follow the same strategy for NWN, but GOG stepped in and pulled the old edition anyway?

I mean it's not impossible, but it does seem an irrational conclusion to make.
People have voted for Brexit AND Trump. Stupidity is clearly boundless.
avatar
Dark_Ansem: And while I appreciate that, I'd like you to be as "righteous" in calling out someone slandering an innocent, until proven guilty, party. Why is there no hatred towards GOG? After all, MY evidence (which is actually made from source stuff, and not conspiracy theories) shows that the decision is joing. Why the same behaviour is acceptable if carried out by one party and despicable if coming from someone else?

I don't care about reputation itself. It DOES bother me, however, that effectively this community is prone to be fooled by Daily Mail titles instead of doing its research.
avatar
paladin181: I called you out cause you were the one flinging insults. We can get along, man. It's just a game! Unless.... do you work for Beamdog?!
Yes, and I'm saying that it's quite myopic and superficial. Behaviour and messages without insults can be just as or more damaging. So back to my question: why are you not calling out the hatemongers and the hypocrisy?

And no, I don't work for Beamdog. I just really dislike liars.
Post edited October 11, 2018 by Dark_Ansem