The poll was conducted by washington post unless they are lying here

Edit: Got ninja'ed I guess but I still have the link to the original thing so I win. :P

Fine then, if he can use The National Review, I get to use The National Equirer, which means only one thing:

BILL COSBY HAD HIS SON MURDERED!!!!

Okay, this settles it.
You're a pedo, and this is your plan to prevent children from reporting on you and living with a "possible pedo, avoid avoid avoid" warning label for the rest of their lives. Die, turd.

So finally a trans voice talks about this whole mess. Good on ya.

I have to ask, though, even if this is just me having a panic attack, do you truly believe that no harm will come of this to any children whatsoever?

And if, in the very unlikely off-chance it does happen to ONE child, are you going to be ok with it? Are you willing to write off whatever happens to that hypothetical child as a necessary price to pay so you can have this particular right?

And has it ever occurred to you that there could be another solution where the safety of children, real or imagined, would not even be an issue?

Who cares about this bathroom nonsense!? My god man, don't you realize....

TED CRUZ FATHER IN ON ASSASSINATION!!!!!!

It's possible, but there is a lot of indoctrination here. For example girls wear pink and boys don't. My son claims he doesn't like pink or purple, but that's just because they are 'girl colours'. Who picks these colours? Society. Girls and boys are pushed in certain directions in things like looks from a young age. That's what makes men who wear dresses trans, but there's no problem with women who wear trousers. (Not so long ago it would have been strange for women to wear trousers, but now we've grown past that. We haven't grown in the other direction.)

Also, differences aren't a problem, and neither is noticing them. Just because a boy is different from a girl doesn't mean that the girl suffers in any way by looking at a boy. It's just that we as a society worry what this can lead to, so we condition the girl to fear seeing a naked man. In societies in which people have fewer inhibitions regarding nudity, it would seem totally normal to the girl.

How well do you sleep at night? Does your conscience bother you?

The morons in favor of changing the Redskins name (rather one of the few in Indian Country, who happens to have clout) claims that the poll is anecdotal because it doesn't support her offended point of view.

Dude, I've asked you 3 times "where are all these public locker rooms where young girls are having showers without their parents?"

You've not answered that once.

Also in my last post I wondered what makes a toilet so different from anywhere else? Why do you think people are more likely to get attacked in a toilet?

You didn't expressly state that, you stated that parents could protect their children until they were old enough to go by themselves and then said that a 14 year old boy did had a chance of protecting himself against men. I took that as suggesting that was when you thought a boy was old enough to go to the toilet by himself. I guess I misunderstood, I'm not sure why you're talking about 14 year olds, then.

When do you think a boy is old enough to go to the toilet by himself and how do you propose to prevent these boys from getting raped by the pedophiles who will shortly be moving into the women's toilets to rape the girls?

I didn't say you're ok with grown men being naked near boys, I said "But from you last comment it appears you are totally ok with men using toilets with little boys." Do you get naked when you go to the toilet? Is that where this comes from?

I'm just trying to work out whether you are ok with men and boys using the same toilet, you seem to change from "yes" to "no" with every post. Which one is it? I'll try to break it down as simply as possible, are you:

1. OK with men and boys using the same toilet; or
2. Not OK with men and boys using the same toilet?

I just don't understand the logic behind your complaint. I'm trying to understand what you're scared of.

Originally it seemed to me that you were scared of pedophiles (but only pedophiles who attack girls, not pedophiles who attack boys), then I thought you were worried about pedophiles who attacked boys as well, then you seemed to be scared of 14 year old girls getting raped, now I'm not sure.

IS THIS NOT WHAT YOUT WANTED? ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?

Yes, but there's a reason we condition them. The same reason we condition them to refuse candy from strangers & never get into smelly vans with an old, stained mattress in the back.

Otherwise, it would be completely fine for kids to take a lollipop & drive off with the nice strange man.

As long as those "people" are out there, we have to do this.

As for colours & other, less obvious stuff I won't argue that most people do, in fact, condition their children on those things, but the answer isn't to allow a child with an extremely limited life experience to choose their own gender.

Just for the record, no one conditioned my eldest niece to like pink, but she does. The youngest girl chose blue. The boy chose red. So what?

Cue dtgreene right about now.

And BTW, never trust a woman wearing trousers, ever.

He just told off Starmaker. XD

Goodbye Dalthnock. Where would you like your remains sent? :P

Postage shouldn't be a problem. When she gets done with you there will scarcely be enough left to put into a matchbox.