It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
zeogold: All the world's a game,
And all the men and women merely players;
avatar
Matewis: Like Calvinball I guess
Exactly.
avatar
dtgreene: Well, there is the discussion that followed the release of Baldur's Gate: Siege of Dragonspear.
avatar
Matewis: Perhaps I should've said *friendly game related discussions :P
wouldn't want to spread gross bigoted HATRED(i once unironically played Postal 1). gotta be PC and anti-trump and all.
Post edited May 22, 2016 by dick1982
low rated
avatar
dtgreene: Well, there is the discussion that followed the release of Baldur's Gate: Siege of Dragonspear.
avatar
Matewis: Perhaps I should've said *friendly game related discussions :P
When I started posting on the Elminage Gothic subforum, I actually did get into some interesting discussions about the game mechanics.

Unfortunately, most of the time there was only one other person involved in the conversation.
Sorry, haven't read most of the thread, but I'll respond to something anyway.
avatar
Dalthnock: that a 7 year-old girl will not be adversely affected by the sight of a naked male stranger while she, too, stands naked and at her most vulnerable?
I think that there are other reasons to worry than this particular example. The only reason a 7 year old girl will be adversely affected is if she was indoctrinated that seeing a naked male or being seen by one is damaging. This has nothing to do with the situation itself, rather with general hysteria, and in this instance I'd say that the problem is with the society's treatment of nudity.

Now, letting men into a girls toilet does raise the chance of a paedophile making its way there, and that's a real issue that should be considered, but it's distinctly different.
avatar
Matewis: Perhaps I should've said *friendly game related discussions :P
avatar
dtgreene: When I started posting on the Elminage Gothic subforum, I actually did get into some interesting discussions about the game mechanics.

Unfortunately, most of the time there was only one other person involved in the conversation.
The game subforums unfortunately tend to have very little activity, at least for the games that I own.
low rated
avatar
vsr: In Russia we have only "Prohibited for children. 18+" mark on game's cd/dvd-box. And you have to guess why. I wish we had this "Gay content/characters/protagonist" label. It will help a lot.
What about for download-only titles?

By the way, a couple recommendations from this site with "gay content" that you might want to look into:

Stardew Valley (haven't played it (don't even own it), but I saw a screenshot showing a same sex marriage, complete with the "I pronounce you man and wife" line, or rather what they did to it.)

Undertale: Main character's gender is non-binary (I think this is a clever choice, so that players can imagine the main character's gender to be what they choose), there's a lesbian couple among the major characters, and there's at least one minor gay couple.

avatar
dtgreene: When I started posting on the Elminage Gothic subforum, I actually did get into some interesting discussions about the game mechanics.

Unfortunately, most of the time there was only one other person involved in the conversation.
avatar
Matewis: The game subforums unfortunately tend to have very little activity, at least for the games that I own.
Why not try to generate some activity in those sub-forums?
Post edited May 22, 2016 by dtgreene
i imagine Gay content/characters/protagonist label in russian, with the Russian Orthodox Church symbol, and a line drawing of le emperor Vladimir Putin looking very displeased.
avatar
Matewis: The game subforums unfortunately tend to have very little activity, at least for the games that I own.
avatar
dtgreene: Why not try to generate some activity in those sub-forums?
Yeah, not a bad idea. I tend to monitor several, but I think I'll try to post more in those that I'm playing at the moment. I'm planning to start with JA2 again one of these days, with 1.13 and the Arulco revisited mod. Perhaps I'll create a thread for that where I can post impressions and ask questions.
avatar
Titanium: From a criminal's stand point, assaulting people in the bathroom isn't an ideal plan. One probably crowded escape route, very likely that someone interferes, and, if you go to a place where there are more opportunities to find your target, there are also a lot of other people who might remember you for all sorts of reasons.

Most assaults are going to happen at home, within a family circle. That's a statistic that sticks out, bar none.
that doesn't explain the indian toilet rapists. but i guess some rapists have different standards.
avatar
ET3D: Sorry, haven't read most of the thread, but I'll respond to something anyway.
avatar
Dalthnock: that a 7 year-old girl will not be adversely affected by the sight of a naked male stranger while she, too, stands naked and at her most vulnerable?
avatar
ET3D: I think that there are other reasons to worry than this particular example. The only reason a 7 year old girl will be adversely affected is if she was indoctrinated that seeing a naked male or being seen by one is damaging. This has nothing to do with the situation itself, rather with general hysteria, and in this instance I'd say that the problem is with the society's treatment of nudity.

Now, letting men into a girls toilet does raise the chance of a paedophile making its way there, and that's a real issue that should be considered, but it's distinctly different.
I understand your point of view, but I respectfully disagree on both the issue being distinctly different & that the only way for a child to be affected is if she was conditioned to be so.

The times I took my nieces to the public playgrounds afforded me several opportunities to observe small children playing naturally without adult meddling, as the Social Justice issues aren't present here YET, and I can tell you that there is an intrinsic knowledge that they are different, that is to say, girls behave, act & view themselves as different from the boys & vice versa.

In fact, the natural order of things, without white guilt interference, is that we are programmed to notice the differences from early on, even if we don't know why or how.

This leads me to conclude that what's currently happening in the United States is nothing short of psychological violence against children, because they are being FORCED by ADULTS to be equal, against their own natural instincts.

This, of course, leads to confusion in the children's mind, which are then brutally persuaded to allow themselves to be mutilated, just so the adults that should instead be protecting them can feel good about themselves.

The fact that there is a very tiny percentage of children who will eventually identify themselves as a different gender is no excuse for these vicious attacks on minds of the majority of children.

As noted a few post above, there's finally pro-gay groups coming forward with conclusive studies that this kind of brutality is wrong & should not be allowed to continue.
Hey Dalthnock, got that evidence I requested?

90% of Native Americans are waiting. :P
avatar
tinyE: Hey Dalthnock, got that evidence I requested?

90% of Native Americans are waiting. :P
Post 197, 14 hours ago: https://www.gog.com/forum/general/lets_sacrifice_our_children_in_the_name_of_tolerance/post197

I will give YOU the benefit of the doubt, because I do believe you truly missed it, and not on purpose, like some people are doing here over & over again, to further who knows what kind of agenda.
avatar
tinyE: Hey Dalthnock, got that evidence I requested?

90% of Native Americans are waiting. :P
avatar
Dalthnock: Post 197, 14 hours ago: https://www.gog.com/forum/general/lets_sacrifice_our_children_in_the_name_of_tolerance/post197

I will give YOU the benefit of the doubt, because I do believe you truly missed it, and not on purpose, like some people are doing here over & over again, to further who knows what kind of agenda.
The National Review doesn't count.

They insist global warming is a hoax.
avatar
tinyE: The National Review doesn't count.

They insist global warming is a hoax.
It is a hoax. It the relative melting points of all matter thats changed.
avatar
tinyE: Hey Dalthnock, got that evidence I requested?

90% of Native Americans are waiting. :P
Now is the part where you tell me your sources are more reliable than mine, go ahead. Play that card.

And you did. How nice, it's almost like I know what every single one of you is going to say even before YOU do. Almost like you people have been bleating the same shit over & over again, louder every time until it becomes "fact".

Not one single original thought in your morally corrupt brains.

And by the way, the poll was conducted by the Washington Post, NOT the National Review, as you'd know if you'd bothered to check. The National Review is simply the opinion piece, the source is the Washington Post.

Which you'll tell me it doesn't count, either.
Post edited May 22, 2016 by Dalthnock