OneFiercePuppy: Remember when you said the US economy would collapse on September 27th?
You were wrong, of course. I got the date from somewhere else, saying the currency would collapse. Mind you that currently the Stock market is being propped up by the banks, and
Deutche Bank is about to go under which is going to cause a
LOT of problems as it seems to be in the middle of a lot of other banks and currencies; So just because it
didn't happen on the 27th doesn't mean it isn't happening still. Although the date (
and title) were likely more to get someone to actually watch the video/content in question and be open to the idea rather than being 100% accurate.
OneFiercePuppy: Remember when you said that the internet would fall apart once the naming authority was made multinational? And you somehow thought that DMCA was related, and also that the entire internet would get censored.
You were wrong about all of that. Considering you claimed to be a computer guy, that was especially embarrassing , since you actually
made a few claims yourself which were not just wrong, but amazingly ignorant.
We shall see. Just because nothing had yet happened doesn't mean it won't still happen. Hillary Clinton, George Soros and other countries would love to see free speech go, in fact censorship is happening on Twitter, Facebook, Youtube.
DMCA and
Copyright is already being used as a form of censorship along with
the DMCA. So I am not wrong yet, it just hasn't taken full force yet. Just like the XBone always-on-kinnect it had more than enough potential.
OneFiercePuppy: Oh, how about the part where just after that you said that
toothpaste is poisonous? That was a good bit, too, especially since
we already had that particular bit of crazy here a little while ago and it was addressed quite exhaustively. You haven't come back on that, either. Did learning actually occur?
Fluoride is still a poison. Note
'if swallowed contact poison control'... Or am I wrong in thinking
poison is somehow a heart medication?
Had to end up using google, enjoy the myriad of warning labels.
OneFiercePuppy: Now we can add the part where
you don't know how evidence works about weather, either and don't fact-check anything.
EDIT: Oh, forgot about the part where you claimed the US was in a state of war. That requires a declaration of war, which requires an act of Congress. You're wrong about all that, too.
This is the part that should be of interest to you there. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/nato-summit-2014-cyber-attack-could-trigger-retaliation-all-nato-members-1464230 Nato members have agreed to add cyber-attacks to the list of offences that would trigger the retaliation of all 28 member states.
Cyber-attacks will now have the potential to trigger Article 5 of the Nato Charter, which states the alliance will defend any member which finds itself under attack.
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/North_Atlantic_Treaty#Article_5 The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.
Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.
Does this not read that Cyber attacks are equal to the bombings in 9/11? Afterall Article 5 was enacted when the twin towers were bombed...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLfkJODepcI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZN2OaKFOrw - This is what Hillary makes it sound like too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2hkL3V3YjM - A '
message' will be sent
So tell me what happens when we poke Russia and Russia pokes back? What if a US operative happens to be in Russia and attacks back to give the excuse? Or do they even need any proof at all because it's not a physical attack?
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2002/How-To-Start-A-WarMay02.htm (
1848-1989)
The creation of false excuses to justify going to war is a major first step in constructing public support for such deadly ventures. Perhaps the most common pretext for war is an apparently unprovoked enemy attack. Such attacks, however, are often fabricated, incited or deliberately allowed to occur. They are then exploited to arouse widespread public sympathy for the victims, demonize the attackers and build mass support for military “retaliation.”
..
Every time the US has gone to war, pretext incidents have been used. Upon later examination, the conventional perception of these events is always challenged and eventually exposed as untrue.