It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Emob78: There's Kool-aid in every single water molecule on planet Earth. I know, I saw it on an episode of Bill Nye the Science Guy.

And on the 8th day, God filled the Earth with Kool-Aid so he could have his very own punch bowl. And he made it, and he saw that it was good.
avatar
richlind33: Maybe there's a kool-aid fairy. If I could I'd vote for Jim Jones to be the kool-aid fairy. He'd be perfect. I'd even vote for him to be our president. But in all honesty, I'd vote for a vegetable before I voted for Clinton or Trump.
Well, if Jim Jones, Donald Trump, and Hillary Clinton have one thing in common, it's that they taught us well that you can only drink the Kool-Aid once.
low rated
avatar
richlind33: Maybe there's a kool-aid fairy. If I could I'd vote for Jim Jones to be the kool-aid fairy. He'd be perfect. I'd even vote for him to be our president. But in all honesty, I'd vote for a vegetable before I voted for Clinton or Trump.
avatar
Emob78: Well, if Jim Jones, Donald Trump, and Hillary Clinton have one thing in common, it's that they taught us well that you can only drink the Kool-Aid once.
Once you go black, there's no turning back...
low rated
avatar
Emob78: Well, if Jim Jones, Donald Trump, and Hillary Clinton have one thing in common, it's that they taught us well that you can only drink the Kool-Aid once.
avatar
richlind33: Once you go black, there's no turning back...
Sir, I find that stereotype inference to be insulting and offensive! I'm reporting this to the Better Beverage Drinkers of America. I will not stop until all beveragists have joined the great hum.
low rated
avatar
richlind33: Once you go black, there's no turning back...
avatar
Emob78: Sir, I find that stereotype inference to be insulting and offensive! I'm reporting this to the Better Beverage Drinkers of America. I will not stop until all beveragists have joined the great hum.
#RoadkillMatters! ;p
avatar
Emob78: Sir, I find that stereotype inference to be insulting and offensive! I'm reporting this to the Better Beverage Drinkers of America. I will not stop until all beveragists have joined the great hum.
avatar
richlind33: #RoadkillMatters! ;p
Roadkill, you say? Well, sting me in the butt and call me a bug.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ld-DNNZ5y5Y
low rated
avatar
richlind33: #RoadkillMatters! ;p
avatar
Emob78: Roadkill, you say? Well, sting me in the butt and call me a bug.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ld-DNNZ5y5Y
That sucked. Try this one, it explains everything. lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fe4fyhzS3UM
avatar
Emob78: Roadkill, you say? Well, sting me in the butt and call me a bug.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ld-DNNZ5y5Y
avatar
richlind33: That sucked. Try this one, it explains everything. lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fe4fyhzS3UM
That was pretty good. Not sure what was going on, but I'm sure that lady loved licking the horse. As long as everyone walks (or trots) away happy, that's what matters.

And Crewdroog should check out that video. That stuff is right up her alley.
low rated
Here's a headline I see: Warming Alarmists Redefine What A Hurricane Is So We'll Have More Of Them

And my first impression seeing the headline is 'Why not define a hurricane as anything with winds above 30MPH! Then they will be everywhere and all the time!'. But that's just a part of me being super sarcastic.
"This is all part of a financial scheme," says Morano. "If every bad weather event can have new metrics that make them unprecedented and a record, then they will declare it fossil-fuel-'poisoned weather.' Warmist attorneys general will use any storm now to get money from energy companies claiming that their company made tornadoes, hurricanes, floods and droughts worse. They will use any bad weather event to shake down energy companies. That is why the extreme storm meme is so important."

The alarmists need to redefine hurricanes especially now, since the data show that hurricane and tropical storm frequency is "flat to slightly down," and science — yes, that "settled" field that somehow continues to discover new things — has failed to show a link between hurricanes and global warming. They still need to hide the decline, except this time the decline that must be buried is in hurricanes, not the temperature record.
I can't help but think this is incredibly sad.


Although I really wish for another piece of juicy news on maybe making your own SD card slot using a drill press... or something else incredibly obviously stupid. Heh for fun I'll refer to rinkworks.
avatar
rtcvb32: And my first impression seeing the headline is 'Why not define a hurricane as anything with winds above 30MPH! Then they will be everywhere and all the time!'. But that's just a part of me being super sarcastic.
Except that's not what's happening, and the article doesn't suggest it is. It's just another complaint by someone who has no evidence, but wants to use words sounding important or educated.

You aren't being sarcastic, you're being willfully ignorant. Once again, you've looked at a headline, failed to read it (or at least understand it, whatever your eyes may have done), and then posted here something wrong and wrong-headed. It's no surprise to anyone who's been afflicted with your recent doggerel. See, the thing about sarcasm that you don't understand (and why would you? You're just a typical two-and-through army rock) is that it requires a gentle touch. Did you not even wonder why the article you link doesn't provide sources for any of its factual claims? The only article with actual numbers only considers how many days between landfalls in the USA, as though we're the only country in the world with hurricanes/typhoons.

Once again, you're wrong about everything. Let's review.

Remember when you said the US economy would collapse on September 27th? You were wrong, of course.
Remember when you said that the internet would fall apart once the naming authority was made multinational? And you somehow thought that DMCA was related, and also that the entire internet would get censored. You were wrong about all of that. Considering you claimed to be a computer guy, that was especially embarrassing , since you actually made a few claims yourself which were not just wrong, but amazingly ignorant.
Remember when you claimed there was no explanation for something really easy to explain, then as soon as you were corrected you dropped the topic and moved on?
Oh, how about the part where just after that you said that toothpaste is poisonous? That was a good bit, too, especially since we already had that particular bit of crazy here a little while ago and it was addressed quite exhaustively. You haven't come back on that, either. Did learning actually occur?
Now we can add the part where you don't know how evidence works about weather, either and don't fact-check anything.
EDIT: Oh, forgot about the part where you claimed the US was in a state of war. That requires a declaration of war, which requires an act of Congress. You're wrong about all that, too. This is the part that should be of interest to you there.

Don't mind me. Just keeping a tally for anyone interested in your score. You're 0 for everything so far, but that means you can only go up from here.
Post edited October 18, 2016 by OneFiercePuppy
avatar
OneFiercePuppy: You're 0 for everything so far
Not true.
The thread title should count for something. You can't say he was wrong there.
Post edited October 18, 2016 by zeogold
low rated
avatar
OneFiercePuppy: Remember when you said the US economy would collapse on September 27th? You were wrong, of course.
I got the date from somewhere else, saying the currency would collapse. Mind you that currently the Stock market is being propped up by the banks, and Deutche Bank is about to go under which is going to cause a LOT of problems as it seems to be in the middle of a lot of other banks and currencies; So just because it didn't happen on the 27th doesn't mean it isn't happening still. Although the date (and title) were likely more to get someone to actually watch the video/content in question and be open to the idea rather than being 100% accurate.

avatar
OneFiercePuppy: Remember when you said that the internet would fall apart once the naming authority was made multinational? And you somehow thought that DMCA was related, and also that the entire internet would get censored. You were wrong about all of that. Considering you claimed to be a computer guy, that was especially embarrassing , since you actually made a few claims yourself which were not just wrong, but amazingly ignorant.
We shall see. Just because nothing had yet happened doesn't mean it won't still happen. Hillary Clinton, George Soros and other countries would love to see free speech go, in fact censorship is happening on Twitter, Facebook, Youtube. DMCA and Copyright is already being used as a form of censorship along with the DMCA. So I am not wrong yet, it just hasn't taken full force yet. Just like the XBone always-on-kinnect it had more than enough potential.

avatar
OneFiercePuppy: Oh, how about the part where just after that you said that toothpaste is poisonous? That was a good bit, too, especially since we already had that particular bit of crazy here a little while ago and it was addressed quite exhaustively. You haven't come back on that, either. Did learning actually occur?
Fluoride is still a poison. Note 'if swallowed contact poison control'... Or am I wrong in thinking poison is somehow a heart medication?

Had to end up using google, enjoy the myriad of warning labels.

avatar
OneFiercePuppy: Now we can add the part where you don't know how evidence works about weather, either and don't fact-check anything.
EDIT: Oh, forgot about the part where you claimed the US was in a state of war. That requires a declaration of war, which requires an act of Congress. You're wrong about all that, too. This is the part that should be of interest to you there.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/nato-summit-2014-cyber-attack-could-trigger-retaliation-all-nato-members-1464230
Nato members have agreed to add cyber-attacks to the list of offences that would trigger the retaliation of all 28 member states.

Cyber-attacks will now have the potential to trigger Article 5 of the Nato Charter, which states the alliance will defend any member which finds itself under attack.
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/North_Atlantic_Treaty#Article_5
The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.
Does this not read that Cyber attacks are equal to the bombings in 9/11? Afterall Article 5 was enacted when the twin towers were bombed...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLfkJODepcI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZN2OaKFOrw - This is what Hillary makes it sound like too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2hkL3V3YjM - A 'message' will be sent

So tell me what happens when we poke Russia and Russia pokes back? What if a US operative happens to be in Russia and attacks back to give the excuse? Or do they even need any proof at all because it's not a physical attack?

http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2002/How-To-Start-A-WarMay02.htm (1848-1989)
The creation of false excuses to justify going to war is a major first step in constructing public support for such deadly ventures. Perhaps the most common pretext for war is an apparently unprovoked enemy attack. Such attacks, however, are often fabricated, incited or deliberately allowed to occur. They are then exploited to arouse widespread public sympathy for the victims, demonize the attackers and build mass support for military “retaliation.”

..

Every time the US has gone to war, pretext incidents have been used. Upon later examination, the conventional perception of these events is always challenged and eventually exposed as untrue.
Attachments:
flouride.jpg (390 Kb)
low rated
http://ktla.com/2016/11/07/passengers-find-snake-on-a-plane-to-mexico-city/

Snake found on plane, forces early landing to remove stowaway.
Only in Oz, woman arrested has baby koala in handbag.
avatar
timppu: I guess this was half-necro, almost dead.
Whoo-hoo-hoo, look who knows so much. It just so happens that your friend here is only MOSTLY dead. There's a big difference between mostly dead and all dead. Mostly dead is slightly alive. With all dead, well, with all dead there's usually only one thing you can do.
low rated
avatar
TARFU: all dead there's usually only one thing you can do.
Loot his pockets and steal his shoes? :P

(trying to reference princess bride, but it's been so long. Love billy crystal in some of his roles)
Post edited November 08, 2016 by rtcvb32