mrkgnao: a) You're preaching to the choir.
b) If you find it more productive to wait for a solution, rest assured that GOG will leave no stone unturned in its tireless effort to make you wait.
I could even search for the games' names on wikipedia, if that was the only issue. It's just as needlessly complicated as using Magog.
By my experience, until now, GOG has been moderately receptive about the crowd's opinion. The fact that they made the local currency conversion optional instead of mandatory, a very similar case, was due to massive requests from the users. Speaking your voice against something, and doing it in numbers, is anything but useless.
If creating a request in the Community Wishlist, as i did, and publicizing it among other users, doesn't sound as proactive to you while sitting on my couch and use Magog to research the game names without even trying to convince GOG to look for a better solution seems more productive to you, i guess we have different views on what should be considered productive.
Instead of being so negative about GOG, why don't you subscribe the request as well, since you obviously seem about as happy about the changes as i am? Please, any extra vote would help!
CLBrown: I LOVE the idea of "unbundling"... IF you combine it with the ability to organize by folders (ideally, by nestable folders).
If I, for instance, have the option of creating a folder on my shelf (or perhaps it would be a "box" or a "drawer" or so forth, in visual terms) called "Star Wars Games" and inside of that I can create a nested folder (or whatever) called "X-Wing Series"... that would be PERFECT.
That's what i mean with the community wishlist i started:
http://www.gog.com/wishlist/site/give_users_an_option_to_bundleunbundle_games The unbundling of game packs isn't necessarily BAD per se. It's the mandatory way they are handling it that is just amazingly messy. Making it an arrangement option would be way more useful to customers and clean. And your idea is probably even better.