SirPrimalform: Trump being in power is scary, the fact that people wanted to put him there is scarier still considering what we already know about him. It's not about what Trump might do, it's what it says about America that they are ok with putting him there.
You know nothing about Trump on the political field. That was one of his greatest strengths in this campaign: The unknown quantity vs the candidate you know is corrupt and inept at foreign policy. If the former scares you more than the latter, it's because your fear of the unknown (with a healthy helping of confirmation bias) happens to be greater.
jamyskis: What this election has basically done is make a statement about America, and it's not a favourable statement in any way, shape or form.
Putting one's own country first, favoring a non-interventionist policy and thinking about the parts of your electorate that don't work for multinationals doesn't strike me as unfavorable in any way, shape or form.
All this talk about trying to "understand" why people elected him stinks of the appeasement policies of the mid-1930s.
Oh, hi there, mr. Godwin! Fancy seeing you here.
At the end of the day, either people knew exactly what they were voting for - which in the case of the rich, white, male segment is almost certainly the case.
And what of the poor, white, male segment? The rich, white, female? The rich, hispanic, male? The poor, black, female?
Or they voted for him simply because he railed against Muslims and women
Railing against women? You're going to have to elaborate on that, and how that would whip up support from, heck,
any segment conceivable.
or they did it as some kind of ridiculous "protest" or blind party loyalty.
The republican party undermined him every step of the way, so no, party loyalty, blind or otherwise, most certainly didn't play into that. And what's so ridiculous about a protest, and why the quote marks?
That means that those who voted for the Trump are either of the elite establishment that he claims to oppose, vile bigots, or complete idiots. There's really no explaining your way around a Trump voter being one or more of these three
There isn't? Really? Such arrogance and conceit beggars belief. Or is this your way of processing having been utterly wrong about this election?
Until now, I believed that the problem with America was with the politics, but it's not. It's with the people.
The "problem" or the virtues of any and all country is
always about the people.
Regals: This election was not dem vs rep or lib vs conserv it was simple
This was globalism vs nationalism. Ding, ding, we have a winner here.