amok: I'm confused. Do you mean there are no offiline istallers, or that the installers are not updated?
pds41: I *think* this is all saying that the offline installers aren't up to date with the latest patches issued by the developers. I don't think they're saying that there are currently any games on sale without an offline installer (possibly apart from Gwent, but I don't play that so have no idea).
It looks like the thrust of the argument is a "thin end of the wedge" that the lack of updates might mean that in the future GoG won't provide offline installers at all.
I don't have many views on this - I mean, I see the risk that they're talking about, but beyond an issue with Postal years ago (where the patch to make it playable again took ages to get to GoG), I've never had a visible issue caused by out of date installers.
That being said, a lot of the concerns I had when Galaxy was developed (e.g. a loss of focus on the rest of the site, slowly bringing in DRM, etc) have come to pass - despite many users mocking me at the time and saying that a client was the best thing ever and would be fantastic for GoG...
so the title is very wrong (click bait?). And according to the link OP has posted, then the installers in question here are now updated, they where a couple of days ago..... before he made this thread.... so I am not sure what the problem is?
Anyway, it in not news that the installers are updated later then Galaxy, for several reasons. one is that you need to package the installers, while for Galaxy you just chuck them into th pipeline, some devs can even do it themselves without having to wait for gOg staff to click the buttons. secondly, in Galaxy you can easily do hotfixes and micropatches, while for installers it makes sense to le them accumulate in to larger updates. All this is not new, and comes with using installers.