It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
What the @ell? Guess I missed something in the past day..catching up...
avatar
dedoporno: I have one question that has probably been asked already or the answer is publicly available, but it's still easier to ask.

@MU players that may have played on our forum: Was the 10 minutes lock a problem for you ever?

I'm just curios on how things look from the other side of the fence. Like I wrote before, I always thought of this a annoying limitation but when I faced a game without it I saw what difference in pace it results in.

From what I saw most if not all MU players are actually from other communities. I wonder if others have similar limitations/rules that don't apply at MU or wherever else you are playing. How are dealing with that?
avatar
bler144: I'm disappointed in you.

You drew parity cop, greatest of all cops, and subbed out?

SHAME!
avatar
dedoporno: And with no N0, too. Hardcore AF!
I'm a hell of a lot more active and engaged on forums that don't have restrictions like that; I'm not a person who can get their thoughts out in one fell swoop/also keep up via mobile when playing the game and the 10 minute rule limits that quite a bit.
avatar
Newcomb: @Stanari - please play with me again, I secretly bask in your flattery and enthusiasm for gifs even though I'd never admit it. If you ever roll w/v against me you're going to be able to pocket me so hard.
<3 <3 <3

I'm pretty sure I've been saying this since Champs tbh, but yes must play with you again! I'm almost out of the RL hell I've been in since October and further hells will only be by choice, so I'll probably be able to actually keep up with games again lol.


avatar
dedoporno: @MU players that may have played on our forum: Was the 10 minutes lock a problem for you ever?
A little bit. Merge means I'm averse to posting short posts unless there's a lot of people conversing at the moment, which means I tend to sit on stuff that I otherwise post. I'm an in-the-moment player usually so this makes it hard for me to engage and town properly. Not really a problem in Oakwood as much because I didn't want to town too hard, but if I was in a situation where I thought I needed to town I can see that being frustrating.

This is coming from the person who once posted like seven times in a row though.
Sad to see this end. I was enjoying the game as overwhelming as the post size was.

SR - good to know you and DragonSushi are one and the same

Brasas - glad to see what you were up to, I wasn't sure how the hell to read you. About the only thing I had was your play was much cheekier than anything in a previous game. I did wonder if you were trying to pocket uber (ironic how that worked out).

I was suspicious of Wyrm but nothing solid. I was suspicious of drealmer's early push on brasas, but the longer he posted the more he felt town.

Newcomb - the wall thing is great, kudos
avatar
cristigale: Sad to see this end. I was enjoying the game as overwhelming as the post size was.

SR - good to know you and DragonSushi are one and the same

Brasas - glad to see what you were up to, I wasn't sure how the hell to read you. About the only thing I had was your play was much cheekier than anything in a previous game. I did wonder if you were trying to pocket uber (ironic how that worked out).

I was suspicious of Wyrm but nothing solid. I was suspicious of drealmer's early push on brasas, but the longer he posted the more he felt town.

Newcomb - the wall thing is great, kudos
You were playing a solid game, I thing you were doing great and would have been a big asset for town. I might have had to NK you at some point :)
Here's the messed up part...you know who was really probably going to win?
Zork

Everyone is missing the line in his PM that says his win condition supersedes all others. If we take out Book and Dya in the first days, it's probably all going to come down to how long Trent stays undercover because with two scum dead, Zork's Scum +1 is far less important. Zork might die if Trent stays around long enough and we are looking for a Godfather, but I'm not so sure anyone touches Zork otherwise.

@Tammy What mads me pretty sure Tom was town was his recognition that scum wouldn't say they had a bonus prize. It showed awareness that he was parsing posts for what made sense from both sides. Most scum aren't going to pick up on that.

The great irony being we could dominate the game and then lose because we didn't deal with the Neutral Survivor.
Post edited December 14, 2016 by RWarehall
avatar
RWarehall: Here's the messed up part...you know who was really probably going to win?
Zork

Everyone is missing the line in his PM that says his win condition supersedes all others. If we take out Book and Dya in the first days, it's probably all going to come down to how long Trent stays undercover because with two scum dead, Zork's Scum +1 is far less important. Zork might die if Trent stays around long enough and we are looking for a Godfather, but I'm not so sure anyone touches Zork otherwise.

@Tammy What mads me pretty sure Tom was town was his recognition that scum wouldn't say they had a bonus prize. It showed awareness that he was parsing posts for what made sense from both sides. Most scum aren't going to pick up on that.
I was really hoping someone had a vig and used it on Zork at some point because I would not have wasted a NK on him and I don't think Uber or bookwyrm would have either.
avatar
trentonlf: I was really hoping someone had a vig and used it on Zork at some point because I would not have wasted a NK on him and I don't think Uber or bookwyrm would have either.
Why would you? He was an ace in the hole giving a scum + 1 if needed. ANd many townies were talking about how they probably weren't going to worry about him with a reasonable chance we off him if we reach "effective" LyLo.
avatar
trentonlf: You were playing a solid game, I thing you were doing great and would have been a big asset for town. I might have had to NK you at some point :)
Thanks! I was looking forward to using the Watcher - first time for that role. Going back through the thread, I see you had a vote on dya = good for you, busing a buddy

Think you would have made it late in the game. You were no where on my scum radar.
Post edited December 14, 2016 by cristigale
avatar
RWarehall: Why would you? He was an ace in the hole giving a scum + 1 if needed. ANd many townies were talking about how they probably weren't going to worry about him with a reasonable chance we off him if we reach "effective" LyLo.
Very true. I was wrong about bookwyrm though, he really did not like Zork's attitude and might have NK'd him if he could not get a lynch on him.
avatar
RWarehall: Here's the messed up part...you know who was really probably going to win?
Zork

Everyone is missing the line in his PM that says his win condition supersedes all others.
... is that really what that means?

Like. We chain lynch all 4 mafia, game over, town loses, Neutral Survivor wins?

I have to say, I'd have been preeeeeeetty salty about that. I can't see that scenario making sense from a design perspective.
avatar
cristigale: Thanks! I was looking forward to using the Watcher - first time for that role. Going back through the thread, I see you had a vote on dya = good for you, busing a buddy

Think you would have made it late in the game. You were no where on my scum radar.
I was not sure if dya was scum, but I would have bused any of my scum buddies if I had too for sure :)

As for making it late in the game, I would love to think I would have but I'm not sure. There were a lot of strong Town players and it would have been tough to stay out off of their radar that long (I was mainly concerned with you, RW, SR, and Newcomb). But I sure would have tried my best to do it :)
avatar
RWarehall: Here's the messed up part...you know who was really probably going to win?
Zork

Everyone is missing the line in his PM that says his win condition supersedes all others.
avatar
Newcomb: ... is that really what that means?

Like. We chain lynch all 4 mafia, game over, town loses, Neutral Survivor wins?

I have to say, I'd have been preeeeeeetty salty about that. I can't see that scenario making sense from a design perspective.
That's how I'm reading it and I think that is the extra ability Zork was pratting on about...
Have to ask Yogs to be sure.
As to whether Trent would have been caught, there were quite a few PRs out there. He wasn't watcher/tracker immune and if he gets jailed, that might catch him too.
Post edited December 14, 2016 by RWarehall
avatar
trentonlf: I was not sure if dya was scum, but I would have bused any of my scum buddies if I had too for sure :)
So scum didn't know their teammates? I haven't read the role info, just piecing what I've seen here. PM'd yogs for it but I think he is offline for the night.
avatar
cristigale: So scum didn't know their teammates? I haven't read the role info, just piecing what I've seen here. PM'd yogs for it but I think he is offline for the night.
check your chat for a link


dya was the only one I didn't know was scum
Post edited December 14, 2016 by trentonlf