Posted July 16, 2018
bler144
μαϊμού
bler144 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2013
From United States
JoeSapphire
Consultant Liar
JoeSapphire Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jun 2011
From United Kingdom
Posted July 16, 2018
I'm caught up. There's not much I can say regarding the arguments that have been put forward recently, mostly because I'm tired and I'm struggling to follow them... If there's anything anyone's asked/brought against me specifically that I've forgotten please remind me!
So let's do a list of everybody on the scale of 1-to-scum from memory.
SirP - claimed. Blocked flub who's a fairly uncontroversial choice. (Not sure about the logic though! You think he's neutral so you want to prevent whatever he might be up to (what are you thinking? Cultist? What other neutrals have scary powers?) Surely the first aim of a town roleblocker should be to prevent the night kill. Hm. Not sure about this.) 7
Adalia/Bookwyrm - 7. Some scummy logic? Unhelpful voting or refusing-to-vote at the end of day one? Damn I should go and look this over again before I post this because I don't think any of that is right... THANKS JOE
ZFR - I believe the claim, not unreservedly. 3
Bler - I've been reading still with the eyes of "this is a townie player" I think there's been a few things I'm not sure about, but can't think what they are - 4
Hypersomniac - 5 - tricky to read. More hotheaded in defense than I was expecting. Tempting to see ZFR/Cristi/Hypersomniac scum team. But I don't hold out much hope. Hm... but the argument has seemed to be most forceful in refuting, not-entirely-logically, Lift's proposal that stalling till last minute was deliberate to protect speeding lunchwagons. At least I can recall that argument, and it's passion interested me.
LIFTHRABBIT in capital letters for some reason - 8 Still tempted to name rabbit as scum. A few people have mentioned that they think Lift's scummy it would be nice to find out if they're right.
Cristi Gee - 6 . I don't know?? Accused of being absent in argument, if not in presence (if you understand me). Frustrating that we failed to lynch. Odd that Hypersomniac claims he still wouldn't have lunched her (esp with the recently discovered quote "I won't let there be nolynch or whatever I'm Hypersomniac me."
Damnatio - 4 Leaning town don't reall know why. Not heard from him in a while it's probably that
Flub - ?? dammit flub.
ELE - ummm let's say 6. Not happy with her choice to vote SirP instead of ZFR but haven't really logiced that through with my new ZFR-is-town brain. I dunno, sorry.
There. Probably not all that helpful but I need to go to bed and this might help me start getting some ideas back together.
Vitek - 1 <3<3<3
So let's do a list of everybody on the scale of 1-to-scum from memory.
SirP - claimed. Blocked flub who's a fairly uncontroversial choice. (Not sure about the logic though! You think he's neutral so you want to prevent whatever he might be up to (what are you thinking? Cultist? What other neutrals have scary powers?) Surely the first aim of a town roleblocker should be to prevent the night kill. Hm. Not sure about this.) 7
Adalia/Bookwyrm - 7. Some scummy logic? Unhelpful voting or refusing-to-vote at the end of day one? Damn I should go and look this over again before I post this because I don't think any of that is right... THANKS JOE
ZFR - I believe the claim, not unreservedly. 3
Bler - I've been reading still with the eyes of "this is a townie player" I think there's been a few things I'm not sure about, but can't think what they are - 4
Hypersomniac - 5 - tricky to read. More hotheaded in defense than I was expecting. Tempting to see ZFR/Cristi/Hypersomniac scum team. But I don't hold out much hope. Hm... but the argument has seemed to be most forceful in refuting, not-entirely-logically, Lift's proposal that stalling till last minute was deliberate to protect speeding lunchwagons. At least I can recall that argument, and it's passion interested me.
LIFTHRABBIT in capital letters for some reason - 8 Still tempted to name rabbit as scum. A few people have mentioned that they think Lift's scummy it would be nice to find out if they're right.
Cristi Gee - 6 . I don't know?? Accused of being absent in argument, if not in presence (if you understand me). Frustrating that we failed to lynch. Odd that Hypersomniac claims he still wouldn't have lunched her (esp with the recently discovered quote "I won't let there be nolynch or whatever I'm Hypersomniac me."
Damnatio - 4 Leaning town don't reall know why. Not heard from him in a while it's probably that
Flub - ?? dammit flub.
ELE - ummm let's say 6. Not happy with her choice to vote SirP instead of ZFR but haven't really logiced that through with my new ZFR-is-town brain. I dunno, sorry.
There. Probably not all that helpful but I need to go to bed and this might help me start getting some ideas back together.
Vitek - 1 <3<3<3
bler144
μαϊμού
bler144 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2013
From United States
my name is catte
i touch your foods
my name is catte Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Mar 2010
From United Kingdom
Posted July 16, 2018
JoeSapphire: What other neutrals have scary powers?) Surely the first aim of a town roleblocker should be to prevent the night kill. Hm. Not sure about this.)
Serial killers are the ones that sprang to mind when I wrote that, but who knows what crazy shit is lurking. I had four suspects going into night, Flub was the one who really grabbed my attention towards the end of the day. I think he's up to something. In fact I suggest we
brig Flubbucket
so I'm not distracted by his anti-town-ness.
my name is catte
i touch your foods
my name is catte Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Mar 2010
From United Kingdom
Posted July 16, 2018
adaliabooks: I can see where you and Lift are coming from but it kind of feels like a distraction to draw attention away from the end of day yesterday.
Sure Hyper does bear some of the blame for the no lynch but the whole thing was a mess and pushing Hyper as if he is the only one with anything to do with it comes across a bit strong to me.
WyrmYou definitely bears some of the blame: Sure Hyper does bear some of the blame for the no lynch but the whole thing was a mess and pushing Hyper as if he is the only one with anything to do with it comes across a bit strong to me.
Bookwyrm627: And ZFR claims vanilla town. I'm inclined to believe that one since he's the obvious next lynch.
I'd like to CFD to Ele.
Dinner time. You guys figure it out.
Unbrig
Brig Cristi
Guessing between Cristi and flub. Reminder, Brig is reversible.
Emphasis mine. I'd like to CFD to Ele.
Dinner time. You guys figure it out.
Unbrig
Brig Cristi
Guessing between Cristi and flub. Reminder, Brig is reversible.
I'm wondering why he(you) left his vote on an a wagon that obviously wasn't going anywhere when he wasn't planning to come back before the end. That was basically a vote for a no lynch.
A lot of the other problems that went towards the lack of lynch were plausibly accidental but this seems knowing and deliberate.
HypersomniacLive
The Reluctant Voter
HypersomniacLive Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2011
From Vatican City
Posted July 16, 2018
Lifthrasil: Yep. That was my assumption. Otherwise the "I need time to (fabricate a) claim" doesn't make sense. If she were town, she wouldn't have needed time for just stating her role. If she had had a perfect false-claim prepared, she wouldn't have needed time either. So, that leaves only the conclusion that, once she felt the heat, she wanted to prepare the 'perfect claim', for whatever reason, but needed time for that.
Yes, it is possible that she has some town reasons for wanting to fine-tune her claim. What to leave out for example. But I get the impression that she rather has scum reasons for that stalling she did. [...]
You are dangerously underestimating cristigale as a player if you actually think that scum!her would not be prepared for the case she's on the chopping block at EoD, and your post #399 suggests that you don't; you actually say that she's a strong scum player. If that holds true, do you really think she'd drop the ball this badly this game as your current assumption suggests? Yes, it is possible that she has some town reasons for wanting to fine-tune her claim. What to leave out for example. But I get the impression that she rather has scum reasons for that stalling she did. [...]
Lifthrasil: [...] Concerning your screw-up, you can wriggle all you want. I think town-HSL would have voted in that post where you wrote that 'we have less than 5 minutes'. Just to make sure that we don't go to no-lynch. To me it looks as if you, just like your buddy cristi, were stalling.
Who's wriggling? Going over our exchanges, it's you who's dodging my arguments when they point out holes and contradictions in your narrative; you've basically gone fingers in your ears, and "la la la la la la la, not listening; I said you're scum, and that's it, la la la la la la la". Want some more proof? You conveniently keep leaving out what the actual point of my post $602 was, to make me look as if I was just sitting there twiddling my thumbs, and waiting for time to run out. Here, let me quote it for you [emphasis added], though I'm sure you'll just going to ignore it. Again. For the nth time now.
We've got less than 5min, and I'm starting to feel that the only thing we're achieving is more claims coming out. Do we really want that?
In those "less than 5min" something quite alarming was taking shape, and my brain focused on it for a few moments in a critical and time sensitive situation. How absurd of me to try and weigh it all! Lifthrasil: [...]
This is right out the gate. Bookwyrm627 is talking specifically about scum communication/collaboration, and how throwing a wrench to that doesn't hurt town on the same, yet you make an argument that ignores the context that's clearly set in Bookwyrm627's post you quoted. The perhaps more interesting thing about this, is that you never replied back, nor answered his question, when Bookwyrm627 addressed this (post #419), even though you made a number of posts before retiring for the Day. So, why didn't you? Bookwyrm627: [...] 3) If you had a chance to slow (or stop!) scum collaboration, would you use it? There is no chance of hurting town on this point, but NOT using the brig means we have no chance of hurting scum in this area. And if scum have day chat? [...]
Lifthrasil: I know the issue has been discussed back and forth, but I'm new so here's my two cents: "There is no chance of hurting town" is such a blatantly wrong statement. If we accidentally jail an important PR, we either lose their power for the night or force them to reveal themselves. So, while I agree that brigging can be used for town purposes, it can also be abused by scum to push for role-reveals. [...] Lifthrasil: [...] One more thing about Damnation: while littlerabbits question about the town cop was very stupid, I noticed that Damnation actually set that up. He hinted that he thought he had figured out flubb's role. Proposing that the traffic cone might be a hidden role claim instead of a hidden faction claim. ... [...]
[emphasis added] Also addressed by Damnation in the meantime, but 2nd misrepresentation in the same post. Damnation never hinted at having figured out flubbucket's role - post #250, he says he's got an idea who flubbucket is flavourwise, nothing about roles, zlitch about alignments. A post you even link to Damnation during that back and forth of yours, and even insist you're right in your posts #465 and #472. You took that all back today, and apologised for the misunderstanding, because you hadn't made the Orange Case connection. Which is rather interesting since you seem to remember just about everything else related to the series, and quite well.
My point is that you tend to interpret what people say so that it fits your narrative, and insist that it's the way you say, no matter what people reply/explain to you. Could be town!you tunnelling, could be scum!you pushing your agenda. Based on what I've seen, I'm inclined more towards the latter than the former.
bler144: [...] While you are correct that HSL could have been stalling, a) that only really makes sense if both cristi and ZFR are buddies - otherwise you just commit to either busing or voting the other (hard, but not thaaat hard), [...]
adaliabooks: The problem I have with the end of day with Hyper (or Damnation probably too) as scum is that it only makes sense if cristi and ZFR are both scum. [...]
For me it doesn't make sense even if ZFR and cristigale are both scum, but do explain why it does for the two of you. I've got a couple of comments and questions to address to you, but I'm heading to bed after I check my game updates, so it will have to wait until tomorrow.
As will properly going through the non-Lifthrasil posts, before and after the one of his I replied to.
Night all.
Pre-post edit to reply to ZFR as I just saw his post.
ZFR: [...] HSL, forget 5 minuteses, cristis and bad forum software. At that moment in time when I made my vanilla claim. Or rather a few minutes after it:
- There were 40 minutes left. More that enough time to make vote, yet not enough to allow us to dilly dally.
- My wagon was at L-2. It was the only viable wagon since SPF's was coming apart.
- No indication that another wagon is to be formed.
- I claimed vanilla.
- You, by your own admission, had nothing in principle against voting for me (unlike vitek and trent for example).
So why didn't you vote for me then? Can you anser that, HSL? How is it, given the above conditions, a townie play to do anything but vote me? And why do you think my attack is too agressive, adalia, or not particularly well-founded, bler?
I thought that the timeline made it clear, but perhaps not. And I can't put the crappy forum software aside, because that's what we have, and it did play a role, nor cristigale (the why is in my reply). - There were 40 minutes left. More that enough time to make vote, yet not enough to allow us to dilly dally.
- My wagon was at L-2. It was the only viable wagon since SPF's was coming apart.
- No indication that another wagon is to be formed.
- I claimed vanilla.
- You, by your own admission, had nothing in principle against voting for me (unlike vitek and trent for example).
So why didn't you vote for me then? Can you anser that, HSL? How is it, given the above conditions, a townie play to do anything but vote me? And why do you think my attack is too agressive, adalia, or not particularly well-founded, bler?
The above conditions are from your PoV; you may have made your claim around the 40min mark (post #542), but I I didn't read it the moment you made it - see my post #547 saying that I had just processed SirPrimalform's claim (post #517), and hadn't read beyond his claim-post. I commented on your claim in post #578 as that was when I had read through the thread, and processed your claim (it didn't help that your post wasn't just a straightforward claim). That was shortly before the 15min mark (post #583), by which time cristigale was already sitting on 4 votes, i.e. she seemed an equally viable wagon at the time which got me debating who of the two to vote. I believe I've explained the rest a few times already.
So yes, if nothing else was happening before and when you claimed, you'd be right to expect me to vote you when you claimed VT. But that's not how it was, was it? Just go back and read through the posts.
But let me ask you something - you concluded that I didn't vote you because I'm scum. Tell me, what exactly is the motive, goal, and gain from not lynching you for scum!me? Unless your argument is that you're my scum-buddy and I didn't want to bus you (as Lifthrabbit thinks), why did I choose to let you live if I were scum? Same for letting it go to No-Lynch. Even if you assume that I'm scum with cristigale, why wouldn't I lynch you since you aren't on my team? I mean, scum!me should be happy with a dead townie at every EoD, so why not at EoD1?
OK, goodnight for real now.
adaliabooks
"Vell, Zaphod's just zis guy, you know?"
adaliabooks Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jun 2013
From United Kingdom
Posted July 16, 2018
SirPrimalform: Emphasis mine.
I'm wondering why he(you) left his vote on an a wagon that obviously wasn't going anywhere when he wasn't planning to come back before the end. That was basically a vote for a no lynch.
A lot of the other problems that went towards the lack of lynch were plausibly accidental but this seems knowing and deliberate.
Unfortunately that's not one I can answer, Bookwyrm did leave me a note about his brig vote at the end of day, but nothing in particular about why he didn't unvote you other than a general suspicion of you in his reads. I'm wondering why he(you) left his vote on an a wagon that obviously wasn't going anywhere when he wasn't planning to come back before the end. That was basically a vote for a no lynch.
A lot of the other problems that went towards the lack of lynch were plausibly accidental but this seems knowing and deliberate.
Looking at the way things unfolded I'm not sure why he didn't move his vote to cristi (other than I believe she had no wagon on her at the time) but he maybe expected that either his vote wouldn't be needed to secure lynch or he could be back on before the deadline.
I can only assure you that whatever his reasons, they were town, but I don't expect you to believe that.
trentonlf
Easily amused
trentonlf Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2014
From United States
Posted July 16, 2018
elebutterfly: Trenton stands out a little in hindsight too for post 500:
I dunno, is it weird that I can read this like a subtle, jubilant, if pre-emptive, "mission accomplished" ? What made you say that, trenton, at that point?
Especially considering this, previously in post 468:
From here, that looks almost psychic.... Particularly as it was you, sir, who started the 3rd wagon on cristi in post 562.
Look, there was grounds to lynch ZRF, though they weren't ones I agreed with and I do actually believe his claim. He claimed vanilla, which is not grounds to withhold a lynch on D1... What seems to have happened is someone started a 3rd wagon, instead of giving ZFR's one a good shove when Damn and Hyper stalled everything. trenton started it in 562. I'll figure out all the vote swings on that later.
1) I answered that question in post 515, I was off on the time and thought the day was going to end in one minute from my post. I dunno, is it weird that I can read this like a subtle, jubilant, if pre-emptive, "mission accomplished" ? What made you say that, trenton, at that point?
Especially considering this, previously in post 468:
From here, that looks almost psychic.... Particularly as it was you, sir, who started the 3rd wagon on cristi in post 562.
Look, there was grounds to lynch ZRF, though they weren't ones I agreed with and I do actually believe his claim. He claimed vanilla, which is not grounds to withhold a lynch on D1... What seems to have happened is someone started a 3rd wagon, instead of giving ZFR's one a good shove when Damn and Hyper stalled everything. trenton started it in 562. I'll figure out all the vote swings on that later.
2) I still think scum was trying to make the end of the day as muddled as possible to prevent a scum lynch
3) Vitek started the cristgale wagon and wanted others to join him in post 558, and if you would have actually gone back and looked at all my posts I clearly stated I had cristi as one of my scum suspects so I had no issue moving my vote. Post 348 Post 417 Post 489
4) I will never vote to lynch someone I think is town no matter how much it goes against the grain of what people think. Town loses by lynching Town combined with NK's from scum, so if I think someone is Town I will not vote them.
bler144
μαϊμού
bler144 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2013
From United States
Posted July 16, 2018
adaliabooks: The problem I have with the end of day with Hyper (or Damnation probably too) as scum is that it only makes sense if cristi and ZFR are both scum. [...]
HypersomniacLive: For me it doesn't make sense even if ZFR and cristigale are both scum, but do explain why it does for the two of you. I can elaborate on why it doesn't feel useful (to me) to bother with that mental exercise, but it's not shade. Well, not on you, anyway.
It's funny you link both, since adalia's post made me wonder just a bit if he was pocketing me, since I've liked his posts since the "itchy" comment and there it felt like he was echoing. Whether he is echoing or it's independent thought, I think we're both saying "X requires Y, Y is highly unlikely. End." So I think you're reading something into it that's just not there.
He can clarify for himself if he means different.
If you feel pressed to elaborate on why you don't think it fits regardless of it one/both is not HSL-buddies or even scum, smurfy! Feel free. But speaking for myself I just don't find the question that interesting.
I'd rather you talk about other stuff and ask questions and things, personally. But then I'm not one of the people voting you and you'll note in my reads list I have you as a pretty firm not voting, so ultimately it's not me you need to convince. /shrug
While I appreciate the spirit, he's actually voting on a viable candidate, and I'm all for earlier movement in the day. Can't believe I'm saying this but....I don't think we should brig flub...at least not until we can talk about what his vote means / doesn't in D2.
my name is catte
i touch your foods
my name is catte Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Mar 2010
From United Kingdom
Posted July 16, 2018
bler144: While I appreciate the spirit, he's actually voting on a viable candidate, and I'm all for earlier movement in the day. Can't believe I'm saying this but....I don't think we should brig flub...at least not until we can talk about what his vote means / doesn't in D2.
I think that's fair. Unless a compelling reason not to arises, I'd like to see Flub in the brig at the end of the day so I'm going to leave my vote there. Obviously nothing will happen if no one else votes. I'm going to have to re-read cristi and the arguments surrounding her.
PoppyAppletree
"New" "User"
PoppyAppletree Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jan 2010
From Other
flubbucket
"Intoning"
flubbucket Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2012
From Micronesia
bler144
μαϊμού
bler144 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2013
From United States
Posted July 16, 2018
SirPrimalform: ................
In fact I suggest we
brig Flubbucket
so I'm not distracted by his anti-town-ness.
flubbucket: Admit it. In fact I suggest we
brig Flubbucket
so I'm not distracted by his anti-town-ness.
You're distracted by my sweet, sweet can.
But hey, tell us more.
my name is catte
i touch your foods
my name is catte Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Mar 2010
From United Kingdom
Posted July 16, 2018
bler144
μαϊμού
bler144 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2013
From United States
Posted July 16, 2018
cristigale: So I get why players are hesitant or unwilling to use it. But I can't un-see it and what I think it means. It's seems unlikely flub will be lynched today, so I will be moving my vote.
cristigale: rabbit/lift - I see the concern about role-fishing - not voting today, Lift deserves a chance to play
SPF
ZFR
Scum:
Flubb
I liked bler's final arguments:
Vote: ZFR
I'll be back in about 6 hours.
Re-read cristi. This is still the "scummiest" thing to me (recognizing the need to move, delaying doing so by...a full day? And then pretty casual about it. timestamp is meh, but about 100 posts, and prior to the EOD explosion), and even that is pretty meh. Considering this vote only because of the obvious problem. SPF
ZFR
Scum:
Flubb
I liked bler's final arguments:
Vote: ZFR
I'll be back in about 6 hours.
The most interesting thing was going back to an exchange with ZFR:
ZFR: I was offline when he claimed.
I just logged in and started reading. Reached the point where he claimed and unvoted before seeing that trent unvoted 2 minutes earlier.
It jumped out at me considering he's aware of the disjointed time upon his own play, and even had to address questions about his posts looking out of sync when viewed after the fact, but looking at others being definitively scummy for the same exact effect. I just logged in and started reading. Reached the point where he claimed and unvoted before seeing that trent unvoted 2 minutes earlier.
ZFR: I'd like to start where I finished yesterday. HypersomniacLive, Damnation, you left your vote till (in the case of HSL, literally) the last minute. So I ask:
What where you expecting??
Please answer, this is not a rhetorical question.
Unlike vitek, both of you stated that you're not against my wagon. So what is it then? I'm trying to put myself in the mind of a player in your position. "It's almost midnight. 15 minutes left. I know because Poppy keeps reminding. There is a wagon at L-2, which I'm not against. That wagonee claimed vanilla townie. Vanilla! It's obviously very bad for town to go to a no-lynch. What should I do now? Let me think... Let me think... I KNOW! I'm going to wait for 10 more minutes. Brilliant! That's clearly the best course of action to take! Hooray!".
Since I don't see a townie!HSL thinking this way, and since none of the two of you are new in this game to put this as a mistake due to inexperience, I reach the logical conclusion that you must be scum.
vote: HypersomniacLive
brig: Damnation
PS. Written before I read any D2 posts. Going to read them now.
Sigh. This frakking game...we're basically betting the farm on an AtE based on something that did or didn't happen outside the game and can't be verified but ...lots of AtE and was brilliant if faked. Probably a bit cheap either way, but I've probably done similar. But it is what it is. What where you expecting??
Please answer, this is not a rhetorical question.
Unlike vitek, both of you stated that you're not against my wagon. So what is it then? I'm trying to put myself in the mind of a player in your position. "It's almost midnight. 15 minutes left. I know because Poppy keeps reminding. There is a wagon at L-2, which I'm not against. That wagonee claimed vanilla townie. Vanilla! It's obviously very bad for town to go to a no-lynch. What should I do now? Let me think... Let me think... I KNOW! I'm going to wait for 10 more minutes. Brilliant! That's clearly the best course of action to take! Hooray!".
Since I don't see a townie!HSL thinking this way, and since none of the two of you are new in this game to put this as a mistake due to inexperience, I reach the logical conclusion that you must be scum.
vote: HypersomniacLive
brig: Damnation
PS. Written before I read any D2 posts. Going to read them now.
cristi's right - he should have been lunched EOD with that claim. Period. Probably a discussion for post-game.
And now the die feels cast and who wants to waste another day on this distraction? But without that AtE and the need to just call it one way or the other and move on... he would probably still be my first choice...and yet, he's just off the table.
My last post of the day half the time I feel like I'm drunk even though I haven't been drinking.
Come on, cristi. Tell us something profound. How do you read the table, and the various vectors in play?