Lifthrasil: But Bookwyrm hat one little sentence that might be read as slip: "You can't brig us all!" ... who is US in that sentence, Bookwyrm?
SirPrimalform: Really, what post is that? I'd like to see the context surrounding that.
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_reboot_battlestar_goglactica/post66 Quite early and therefore probably just a joke. Still something that somehow stuck out.
JoeSapphire: Have we not played together? some time in 2014?... not that it matters really...
Yes. We have. But it's soooo long ago that I'm not exactly familiar with your playstyle anymore. Also, I was a bloody noob then. :-)
flubbucket: I wish you would show actual post so I can see what I'm misunderstanding.
My thoughts are you are scum and brig me for the night. You then decide with your team to perform No Night Kill.
Next Day accuse brigged player of being scum since No Night Kill occured.
How is this impossible ??
Happy to help:
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_reboot_battlestar_goglactica/post122 and the post from Bookwyrm which you reference in there.
And that scenario is impossible because either there are more than one scum. Then brigging one scum would not prevent the NK. Scum knows who is in the brig when the night starts and so the brigged player would never be the one who attempts the NK. So the argument 'No NK happened so the brigged player must be scum' is wrong and no one, who has read the rules, would be fooled by it.
On the other hand, in the ONLY scenario where brigging would prevent the NK, we would win by the brigging itself. Because if there is only one Cylon left, brigging him wins the game! So there is NO scenario where your "accusing the brigged player of being scum because no NK occured" would work!
All clear now?
Damnation: I'd actually like an explanation of this point. It seems completely unfounded to me that I someone have been in support of flubbucket.
What I was referring to was you giving an alternative explanation for flubb's avatar:
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_reboot_battlestar_goglactica/post250 There you hint that you think flubb made a soft role claim. So you are basically saying: hey, I don't think his avatar means he is scum. I think it means he is a town PR. ... which implies 'don't lynch him!'.
I would call that support!
flubbucket: I stated quite clearly scum would decide to not perform the night kill.
God damn it. Do you really not understand that? Or are you misunderstanding on purpose?
No one (apart from you, apparently) would believe such an attempt at painting someone scum. Let's take your scenario:
*scum doesn't NK*
Next morning they say: "Hey! No NK! The brigged player must be scum!"
Everyone else: "Nonsense. If the brigged player were a Cylon, another Cylon could still perform the NK. There is no connection between brigging and the NK not happening."
There. Scum isn't going to try that route. Because it wouldn't work.
flubbucket: Then lynch me. I don't give a fuck.
Yes. That's what I'm trying to do. ;-) Which is why I vote you. And you not giving a fuck just reinforces my suspicion of you.
So, here's my lynch preference:
flubb
Damnation
ZFR
cristi or SPF
While cristy may be town who has uncovered flubb by noting the little avatar thing and putting pressure on him, there is still the possiblilty that she is scum who noted the little avatar thing as a thing to abuse and put pressure on town-flubb. So, while I tend to believe her at the moment, she still has a more than average probability of being scum, and I'd rather lynch her than nobody. But I'd prefer to lynch flubb first and look at his flip. If he's scum, cristi is mostly cleared (no reason for scum to start bussing so early). If he's town, however, we need to be wary of cristi from tomorrow on.
The thing with SPF is: he feels scummy, but I still don't see anything concrete. So it's the same: better him than nobody. (Hell, that's true for most players). But I'd much rather lynch one from my first three spots.