Bookwyrm627: Read what I actually said: "
seriously claiming scum will
likely get you lynched."
But hey, why assume when we can test! You should seriously claim to be scum, and lets see what happens. For Science!
Oh, I distorted that quote? Your emphasis on "seriously" means what? And claiming it "likely" gets you lynched means you think it gets you lynched, otherwise the statement is entirely noncommital and useless - there's a chance of the opposite happening, and my response says nothing of the opposite.
How can I pass that up! Hey! Everyone! I'm as scummy as the come! I'm a real toaster here! Lynch me! I'm here! Lynch me now! Come on guys, try to go purging! Bookwyrm627: 1) Completely incorrect. Everyone can, in fact, be scum. See above about being in two different "No townies at all" games.
2) What happened to "the setup could very well be 1 town and 12 Jesters. How do you know there are other town players?" ? At least be consistent.
1) I'd argue that, if there is only scum, then no one is scum. If you do not have a concept, how can you have it's opposite?
2) Because the OP clearly mentions Mafia being interchangeable with Cylon, ergo, Mafia is involved. So unless there are alternate win conditions for Cylons than the usual one, it means there must be more town then mafia. I never stated I thought the game was 1 town, 12 jesters - I only said I could be a possibility, and I have no disproven my own stated possibility. Go figure.
Bookwyrm627: *shrug* Your interrogation was simply that bad. It takes some doing for me to wrap my mind around the idea of a townie doing it. The "I guess" is me acknowledging it as a possibility.
Maybe it was bad on purpose? Maybe I just suck at this game? Who knows? (I'm not sure I do, I do actually think I'm incredibly rusty).
You cannot think of town doing this, yet you can think of scum doing this? I'm not sure if I should take that as a serious insult, or as you didn't read my position on town strategy in the post that prompted you to engage me.
Damnation: Anyone flipping anything shouldn't be clearing anyone of anything this early.
Bookwyrm627: You've just thrown some Left-Field questions at somebody. Is there any reason to assume that you wouldn't throw some more at me?
I've shown you I'm capable of things, why should you be safe from my inane ramblings? Besides, I'm not entirely sure what this has to do with the quoted text, as in genuinely I do not understand.
Bookwyrm627: If you really wanted to summarize my intervention, then "What the ever loving crap is this crap?" would do nicely.
This is this second time you felt need to state what your reaction was (or, at the very least, what you want me to interpret your reaction as)
SirPrimalform: Excuse me, I believe I said "Oh my
boat, he sucks!"
Eh, whatever floats your goat. SirPrimalform: I think what bler was saying is that if someone flips town, there's less info in the wagon if it wasn't driven by a good reason. I see where bler is coming from.
That's very likely the case, I just don't see ZFR's vote as much "Oh my
GOAT! You suck!" as you do, I guess.
SirPrimalform: Uhhhh... it's fairly obvious Damnation means the only verified townie at the start of the game is yourself and in a closed setup you can be sure what's lurking there in the dark. Scummier still.
Really, I was hoping no one was going to cut it out like that. Oh well :)
This is amazing! I need to watch A Shot in the Dark now!
SirPrimalform: In most games it would probably get you nommed. Uh lunched. But yes, with the brig there's interesting possibility of neutralising that person. Of course you've got to question why anyone would claim scum. Scum wouldn't, so who would?
The brig would certainly be a frustrating place for a jester.
It's officially lunch instead of lynch now, isn't it?