It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
my name is anime catte: The bold part is not true and you even acknowledge it later in the post. An Innocent Child gives the town a numerical advantage as they reduce the possible scum pool without increasing the scum voting power.
They will always have that. The claim can be made at any point. I have never said it shouldn't be made at any point but to be delayed to when it's needed and it makes sense to make. By "value" I mean knowing the knowledge about a particular individual being Town therefore taking their input at face value. Knowing someone is Town doesn't automatically mean they are correct, have good reads, etc. It mostly servers as a distraction remover and/or one less person to worry about. Alternatively, if they stay hidden a case/wagon can be formed against them that can be shut down with the claim and that push can be taken into account later on. The claim is still made, just not "for free".


avatar
Telika: Which team benefits from certifying an affiliation or keeping it obfuscated?
The affiliation is granted but it's not the only value the role has potential to provide.


avatar
supplementscene: Neither Telika, Lift or Scene are Masons and Catte very probably is not either.
Pondering over this is useless. It's the Mason(s) call whether a claim right now is good or not, possibly after taking other people's input into account. Trying to figure out who a Mason who hasn't claimed on their own won't bring anything good.


avatar
supplementscene: There's a good argument for lynching all innactive players solely down to effort levels.
If we need to rely on such tactics we may as well call the game off and take a rain-check.


avatar
Catventurer: So I'm removing Telika, Lift and Catte from Scene's "no Mason here" group and put them all back into the potential Mason group.
Well done :)


@Atlo, how is that post coming along?
Since Pooka is extending the deadline by a day or two, I'm not feeling as much pressure to consolidate under an already nominated suspect. Here are my thoughts for why I'm voting for Scene:

1. Scene tries selling the idea of the Mason role revealing on the basis that all night powers should converge on the Mason and protect him, leaving everyone else open for an easy night kill. (Post #285)

2. Scene suggests that the cop role reveal. (Post #308)

3. He posts a list of people that he thinks are not the Mason. (Post #339)

4. Scene gives us more bad advise in the form of suggesting that we lynch all inactives for no reason other than that they're inactive. (Post #340)

5. Lynching inactives would not be all at once.
- We lynch one on Day 2, mafia still gets a night kill of their choice.
- We lynch one on Day 3, mafia still gets a night kill of their choice.
- Mafia also doesn't have to explain why they voted the way they did.

Scene either is looking for the Mason or wants to lynch inactives. (Saying that, I am totally okay with lynching an inactive if there's reason to believe that they are mafia.)

Overall, I feel like Scene is trying really hard to not find Mafia, which gives me really big feels that he might be a Scum Lord.


vote Scene
avatar
Catventurer: I think you meant to quote Scene in post #339 here.)
No no, I was quoting myself (I'm always proud of my literary references). It was some sort of follow-up on my sentence.

avatar
Catventurer: 4. Scene gives us more bad advise in the form of suggesting that we lynch all inactives for no reason other than that they're inactive. (Post #340)
This I don't take seriously. I think it was just an expression of frustration in front of idle players.
avatar
dedoporno: @Atlo, how is that post coming along?
Arrived just 5 minutes ago. Haven't actually read your post yet. Just saw my name. Will write shortly. Can tell in advance though - the essence of what I wanted to ask, has already been written in my absence. :(

Will get to you in 30minutes. (I'm a slow typer.)
avatar
Catventurer: 4. Scene gives us more bad advise in the form of suggesting that we lynch all inactives for no reason other than that they're inactive. (Post #340)
avatar
Telika: This I don't take seriously. I think it was just an expression of frustration in front of idle players.
There's also to be considered that people do sometimes make such suggestions and actually mean it.

For that reason and in light of other posts, I'd rather take the post at face value, and let Scene try to explain himself if he wants me to move my vote elsewhere. There's no need to do his job for him.
Right. Done reading. Now typing.

1. Hooray for extended day! \o/
2. Holy moly! O_O
2 days of very little happening and now so much text.

Where did I left off? Oohh.. dedoporno...

To put it bluntly: I wanted to ask your opinion about Scene.

See, the very first thing Scene did when Day2 started was to vote for Liftraisal.
His following posts were... weird, to say the least. By now others have mentioned those, and you yourself have probably read them.

The reason why I am asking you personally is because you have first hand experience of him playing mafia. As beautifully outlined in #161:
avatar
dedoporno: *
supplementscene - I followed scene closely last game when I was modding and he was scum in not-ideal circumstances and it stuck with me how he said that he's sort of a liability to the scum team as he tends to get booted first as whatever alignment. Then he proceeded to overplay his hand after doing a pretty decent job staying hidden and in the good graces of the Town and got booted first. Maybe he's learned as doing an even better job now, good for him. I don't see anything outstanding other than the fact the he chose to follow Frostburn's inital push at me and singled me out from a list of people scene considers inactive. Maybe something, maybe nothing. I like to think it's the latter but we'll see. Middling.
*
The reason why I also mentioned him voting for Lift is... because nobody seems to follow up on this! (Here I am referring to all, not just you personally anymore.)

Even Lift himself pretty much ignored this! His only reaction to this was:
avatar
Lifthrasil: @supplementscene: I am not going to answer your implicit question whether I have a PR.
So... that's kinda all for now. :|
I feel that I have forgotten something; but should I remeber it I will follow up.

---

Oh, and regarding the Mason reveal thing -- I honestly ignored it the last 2 days. Seems I will have to form an opinion about that now too. Great.
avatar
Lifthrasil: And why didn't you contribute before?
The reason why I asked you, instead of ignoring what scene wrote, is easy: I wanted your reply. And your reply is evasive, garnished with a bit of OMGUS.
evasive? you asked why i didn't hammer and i told you. if you wanted to know where i'd been you should have asked that. i forgot i haven't actually apologised in person, only through pooka:
i was visiting a friend for three days, when i got home ready to gog the internet was down, a day in work with no gog access, a couple of days at a different friend's at some point in all that i get to gog just in time to discover that it's twilight.

sorry everybody but i've got a lot of people that demand my attention

avatar
Lifthrasil: Also, why should I ignore something someone wrote even if they are in my suspect pool.
i'm not saying ignore whoever you suspect. i'm saying if you suspect someone i'd expect to investigate if they come out with a easily-verifiable accusation and it looks like you just went along with it. now you're making out like you were actually asking a different question but i'm not sure i believe it.

avatar
JoeSapphire: he'd been hammered by the time i turned up?
avatar
dedoporno: Would you have done it? Why?
would i have voted frostburn if he hadn't been hammered and i knew the deadline was imminent? yeah. why? to get lunch. tbh i haven't read pages 4, 5, 6 still so i cannot claim to have been informed.
avatar
Atlo: The reason why I am asking you personally is because you have first hand experience of him playing mafia.
To be honest I don't know what to say here. I agree with CatV and others that has and keeps making questionable statements. As I said before I think he did overplay his hand when he was scum in my game and pretty much shot himself in the foot by attracting all the wrong kinds of attention even though he seemed to be on the right track from the start. He sort of did a similar thing on the following roulette game where I was pretty much certain he was scum based on similar stuff. I can't really remember his previous games where he wasn't scum but 1) I doubt he only appears scummy when he is one and 2) by his own words he apparently gets lynched no matter what early on either way. He sort of reminds me of Frostburn where he just seems to think and act in a way that is totally dissonant with everyone else and people clash with him so he becomes a low hanging fruit if Town and, by his own admission, kind of a liability for scum. I like to think that if he is scum and his buddies aren't entirely new players and/or just missing they would have talked him down a bit. When he was scum in my game he had a single accomplice and they didn't have daychat. Among other things his buddy lamented the fact that he wasn't able to coach him on how he looks and give him some pointers and I think scene said he could have used that.

TL;DR: He seems like an easy choice but so did Frostburn. I may not be doing myself any favors by saying this if he turns out to be scum but Telika already hates me because we have strategical disagreements and/or it just serves his purpose but I doubt it.


avatar
JoeSapphire: would i have voted frostburn if he hadn't been hammered and i knew the deadline was imminent? yeah. why? to get lunch.
Why did you question his lynch?
avatar
Atlo: The reason why I am asking you personally is because you have first hand experience of him playing mafia.
avatar
dedoporno: To be honest I don't know what to say here. I agree with CatV and others that has and keeps making questionable statements. As I said before I think he did overplay his hand when he was scum in my game and pretty much shot himself in the foot by attracting all the wrong kinds of attention even though he seemed to be on the right track from the start. He sort of did a similar thing on the following roulette game where I was pretty much certain he was scum based on similar stuff. I can't really remember his previous games where he wasn't scum but 1) I doubt he only appears scummy when he is one and 2) by his own words he apparently gets lynched no matter what early on either way. He sort of reminds me of Frostburn where he just seems to think and act in a way that is totally dissonant with everyone else and people clash with him so he becomes a low hanging fruit if Town and, by his own admission, kind of a liability for scum. I like to think that if he is scum and his buddies aren't entirely new players and/or just missing they would have talked him down a bit. When he was scum in my game he had a single accomplice and they didn't have daychat. Among other things his buddy lamented the fact that he wasn't able to coach him on how he looks and give him some pointers and I think scene said he could have used that.
I see. Thank you for your input.
So pretty much what Lift said in #323:

avatar
Lifthrasil: Scene may be Scum or not. He may be unable to grasp the Mason thing and regularly have weird ideas.
Either his idea of ''trying to solve the game'' is having very very weird ideas, or he's just a clumsily mafia.
The ''they would have talked him down a bit'' is very interesting though. But considering we only had ~4-5 players posting the last 2 days he might have had no choice but to act alone.

Will mull some more and post again tomorrow.
Have formed opinion regarding Mason reveal. Will withhold in this post.
Cats under the Christmas tree, so I on a forced tree decorating break. (If you try to put anything on the tree with these cats under it, they get interested and start playing with ornaments. Nothing breakable, but it's still better to not have anyone trying to climb the tree again.)

This means I had time to check the thread and post.


avatar
Atlo: The reason why I also mentioned him voting for Lift is... because nobody seems to follow up on this! (Here I am referring to all, not just you personally anymore.)
I did some backtracking and see that you're referring to Scene's Post #279.

As for why I didn't comment on it sooner, sorry. I really don't have any reason. I've been super distracted/busy with Christmas preparations and that post was three days ago, so I couldn't tell you what I thought of it at the time.

Here's Scene's reasons to vote for Lift in Post #279, and I'm going to quote Scene himself in two parts:

avatar
supplementscene: 1. Before he voted for Frost he send he read Frost as leaning Town.
2. Voting Frost for claiming Mafia is understandable
3. What isn't understandable is having no reads other than an initial reason to lynch someone.
Do you know what's weird about that?

If you check the final Day 1 vote count (Post #260), Scene voted for Frosty too. Is Scene claiming that he really did believe that Frosty was mafia when he voted for him back on Day 1?


If we check back further on Day 1 to see where Scene voted (Post #219.) "So from my POV both of Frosty and Buck could either be lazy townees like myself or potential LAMIST Scums."

Okay and I had to double-check Mafia Wiki on LAMIST. Apparently it doesn't mean "Lame-ist" as in super sucky mafia scum as I had been reading it, but it actually means "Look at me! I'm so town!"

Again looking at this post in hindsight, the post ends up looking like Scum Lord Scene flip-flopping on Frosty so that he doesn't look suspicious when Frosty flips Town. At the same time, he is also proclaiming "Look at me! I'm so town!"

avatar
supplementscene: 4. Therefore Lift is not trying to solve the game
5. Why is Lift not trying to solve the game?
It's interesting that he says this considering that I essentially said the exact same thing about Scene in Post #347 - It looks like he's more interested in looking for a Mason or even a Cop than looking for Mafia.
avatar
Catventurer: the post ends up looking like Scum Lord Scene
You have used that phrase a couple of times now. What does that mean - "Scum Lord"? Fancy way of saying he's mafia or does the lord bit imply something in addition?
avatar
Catventurer: the post ends up looking like Scum Lord Scene
avatar
dedoporno: You have used that phrase a couple of times now. What does that mean - "Scum Lord"? Fancy way of saying he's mafia or does the lord bit imply something in addition?
It means nothing. I'm just being silly because I had been trying to get and [url=https://www.gog.com/en/game/star_wars_knights_of_the_old_republic_ii_the_sith_lords]KOTOR2 to no available. I feel like I'm being thwarted constantly by cats and sith.... at least the cats are not being malicious about it. Anyway, I'm headcanoning that mafia are sith for today only. It's keeping me amused enough to check on the thread.
avatar
dedoporno:
edit by way of posting - That should have been links to KOTOR1 & KOTOR2.
I can be referential for silly reasons when I'm amusing myself.


Anyway, the cats have vacated the Christmas tree so back to decorating. I'll be back when I'm done or they launch another attack.
I have a very very specific question

JoeSapphire. In your own personal opinion of yours. Dedoporno is leaning town or leaning mafia ?
avatar
dedoporno: Sorry to hear that, Micro. Fingers crossed you get through this quickly and cleanly.
Thanks; I'm "mostly" recovered (except for this stupid cough, drippy nose, and being tired all the time) by now.