Looks like no one had anything to say yet. Just as well, since it is less for me to read.
===
Correction to my previous post: I believe Town was at LyLo when they finally managed a second lynch.
===
Dogmaus: probably Town: ZFR (there shouldn't be any Godfather)
Stuff like this makes me think Dog might be scum.
Dogmaus: Why shouldn't there be a Godfather? What information do we have to eliminate such a scenario?
Cadaver747: Not going to vote: Joe (but I don't trust his claim anyway)
...
Book's vote on Joe toDay is worrisome.
You don't trust Joe's claim, but I'm worrisome for voting him in spite of it? Okay.
Dogmaus: Town:
Macho Cop - that was Micro - RIP
Doctor - prevents a NK, but not themselves. Maybe they were not protecting GH, or maybe they were countered by the Mafia Roleblocker?
1-Shot Commuter - Joe according to own's claim, if so and telling the truth has not used the shot yet
I see things like this that just don't make sense to me. She lists what the Macho modifier means, then she goes on to question whether the doc did not protect GH (???) or were countered by the mafia RB? Macho being targeted for the kill means any Doctor's action is irrelevant to whether Micro survives a NK.
I see things like this that bother me. She indicates Commuter didn't use a shot last Night. It isn't an entirely unreasonable *assumption*, but she writes it like she knows. Joe didn't say whether he used a shot or not on N2.
Cadaver747: Any Vote on Joe is worrisome, toDay especially.
Why? Does something confirm him as Town?
Cadaver747: Joe claimed Commuter on L-2 on D2, ... That claim was super stupid to make for Mafia risking a counterclaim from a real one and a result swift lynch.
I've already said it in my previous post, but I'll re-iterate: What would make one commuter think a second commuter won't be in the game? Commuter isn't a role on the level of Cop, or even on the lower level of Doctor. Two Cops could easily be seen as OP, 2 Doctors not as much. 2 Commuters? That's barely a blip on the radar.
JoeSapphire: I} ...
β> ...
Dayvig Joe Monster. >=(
Leoric_AKA_Leo: Is there an easy way to understand why people trust Joe now? Because pooka mentioned there could be a commuter?
People are believing his commuter claim, and Pooka mentioned a setup that included a commuter.
Leoric_AKA_Leo: I'll share the imagination I mentioned on why I suspect Bookwyrm. Because he always the first few people post "in the morning" with something confusing. Cound it be possible that scum tend to "wake up early" because they just hammered who to kill "in the dawn"? Should that even be considered? Correct me if I'm too crazy.
You're too crazy. Take a look at these two posts and tell me what you notice:
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_73_soleannas_supreme_guardians/post276 https://www.gog.com/forum/general/gog_mafia_73_soleannas_supreme_guardians/post754 If you said "They have a timer for the end of the Night phase", you'd be correct. Both timers happened to be convenient for my timezone and life situation.
Also, be aware that scum can submit their action and then go to bed or w/e, depending on local time. Mod may (and probably should) let the Night finish so people can't take guesses about what a short Night meant.
Also also, <3.
Dogmaus:
vote Bookwyrm 1 voted NL at first
2 treated Mango's vote for me as valid, as they had discussed that in their chat, and was expecting it, while it was not even clear if it was about me or a joke.
3 just a feeling about it, sorry
I'll credit 3 as possibly legit, but 1 and 2 are terrible reasons.
1) I'm hardly the only one to vote NL, yet I don't see you having a consistent problem with the others that did so.
2) I've already explained why I wouldn't have been surprised if Pooka accepted the vote. If you have a viable other player you think could have been the target of Mango's vote, then by all means, please share! Whether the vote was a
joke or not is irrelevant to whether I thought the vote close enough to be
valid.
my name is supyreor catte: I admit, I was ready to start the day voting for Joe too so I don't find this post of Book's too suspicious. The much weirder one is that he came back after Joe's "revelation" and had 0 thoughts on it and left his vote there.
I couldn't post an explanation (note my response to Lift asking me again for a response). Voicing my thoughts at the time would have spoiled the hunt.
my name is supyreor catte: Bookwyrm = votes Joe (not sus) and basically ignores all evidence that suggests Joe is town (sus).
What evidence might that be? Joe's claim? We have very different ideas on how townie that claim is.
Dogmaus: Am I wrong to think that currently just one vote is missing to eliminate Bookwyrm?
Joe, Leoric, ZFR, me, catte. There's 10 of us. Let's call this a Day :)
Watch out people, she's got a taste for blood now! :D
Lifthrasil: Joe, well, he has the previous role list going for him. Or more precisely: a scum Joe, who was aware of that list, would probably not have chosen a role from that list for which he would have expected a town counterpart to exist, who would counterclaim. So I have Joe as leaning Town too.
What would a scum Joe, aware of that list and attempting to avoid a lynch, claim instead?
Lifthrasil: I see my refusal to claim was discussed. Bookwyrm, who is scummy, wanted to know my role. Or at least a denial or confirmation of my neutrality. Joe, who is likely town, also expressed that I should have answered. I find that a bit strange, since it's quite customary not to claim unnecessarily.
Good heavens. It isn't customary to claim your
role unnecessarily. Alignment? Claim "Town" regardless of your alignment, unless particular circumstances apply. Neutrals might claim Neutral depending on game state.
You claiming "Town" would have put the kibosh on ZFR's theory (which was kiboshed right after I first asked if you were a survivor, though I didn't know it at the time), which is what I was looking for.
What the heck happened to the meta while I was gone??