Fine here is my short analysis on your posts, not all of them, but most of them.
#32 - you decided to unvote NL (nothing spectacular here but I would do the same in your place)
#50 - I agree with you on that, see below
GymHenson: You seem to have forgotten to mention that we can
also gain info from reading what people say/don't say and whom they vote/don't vote, and when such occurs.
Also such wagon analysis only works if people do it(in some past games people rarely seemed to do much of such) ;)
GymHenson: So none of the others who voted for NL(like myself) after the first NL vote are as suspicious? o.0 ;)
#65 - same, the Book's so called *rolefishing* was too obvious for even a crazy Mafia to do.
GymHenson: Do you really think Bookwyrm would be so obvious as scum?
#71 - good point about Book asking for opinion without sharing his own
#117 - same as #65
#124 - I agree that newbies/lurkers should be suspected but not because of some *last game* experience, but always
#133 - same as #124
#136 - an odd mistake you did naming Leoric ZFR's friend instead of Mango (this is the first bad example I have of you)
#140 - thank you, but I don't need your advice on that, I know perfectly well how to put votes and about double posting ;)
#142 - that Leoric vote looks a bit rush but according to your logic that lurkers are dangerous I find it reasonable (semi-bad, yet half-good)
#144 - same as #140
#151 - this I don't like, first you mention lurkers should be put on voting and now you *realize* that newcomers should not be lynched on D1 (second bad example)
#153 - same as #124
#165 - same as #124
#180 - same as #124 + a self-sacrifice notion (the newbies/lurkers thing is getting old)
#183 - did you put a shade on Book? Scum have a day chat for that, odd mistake (third bad example)
#184 - EBWOP'ed post where you explained further that it could be a pocketing (sounds reasonable enough for me)
#193 - same as 184
#205 - you named two possible scum pairs Dedo+Mango(me) and Book+Leoric and put a *pocket shade* on Micro (can't say it's way too good, but I see it as that you're trying to help)
#214 - put a vote on Joe, seems ok I guess (he wasn't very active)
#219 - NL is bad, unbelivable
#253 - same as #219 + a vote on Joe is now bad (a bit erratic to my liking)
#256 - I agree that puting you on L-1 might be considered as too soon yet I don't think you weren't properly informed beforehand
#257 - reminding about L-1 status is always a good thing to do in my book
#260 - you claimed Town Vanilla, I would never do that but I can explain it only after the game ends
#266 - same as #256
#273 - scums surely might see you as an easy target
... Sorry
I need to go for now. Later.
GymHenson: In a previous game's role flavor/etc I was a guard, and I also roleplayed that I moonlighted as a trader of goods.
(I believe it was one of Pooka's games as well)
I see, it makes sense now since you claimed Town Vanilla. I wasn't sure if you have a Role or not, or if you are Mafia or Town. But my guts telling me that this time you are on a good side. I will kill myself (a figure of speech) if you fool me third time in a row ;)
Microfish_1: [i] 
