Bookwyrm627: ...........<snip>.............
flubbucket: In Game #23, mason claims were very effective. Could you give a summary of what happened to clear up the relevance of your reply to that particular post?
trentonlf: Not voting today unless something extraordinary happens because I believe they are town
1. As much as it pains me, supplementscene.
2. Gamerager, even though he is the leading wagon, and from his posts I believe him that his lynch would be a mistake.
3. Gogtrial, if he's scum I'll tip my hat to him as he has me fooled because everything I see is him trying to figure things out.
4. bookwyrm, same as Gogtrial.
Along with yourself, that's four of the five people I have in my lynch pool which you're unwilling to vote for. I'm guessing you don't agree with my reasoning for provisionally clearing the rest?
What do you think of Joe?
gogtrial34987: ... and you're now newly suspicious for SPF's behaviour toward you (though of course SPF might've expected you to be lynched, and thus wanted to claim town-points for having defended you; isn't WIFOM just the best?))....
JoeSapphire: Did SirP defend supplementscene? I need to re-read this game.
"Defend" is probably a bit stronger a word than what's really warranted, but see my SPF quotes at the bottom of
#458.
gogtrial34987: Nothing is certain, but all the same, I'm feeling pretty good about calling Microfish, PookaMustard and GameRager likely town. flub and dedo are also on the likelier town side of things based on this.
JoeSapphire: historically, SirP and GameRager have been on a mafia team together. As it's been described to me GameRager invented a role and self-destructed for no reason... it's a reason for sirp to be wary about interacting with hypothetically-mafia gamerager.
Could you try this one again with a link that's pointing to the intended thread? This one goes to the current thread, which I don't think is what you intended. Sounds like a game that's worth having a look at, in any case!
Thank you, btw, for actually writing some opinions on my line of reasoning. I've been having the feeling that I'm talking into the void here.
(Which, come to think of it, is hopeful in itself! If I was
completely wrong, then remaining mafia would've had cause to publicly support my line of reasoning and steer us wrong like that. So I'm going to conclude that I'm at least partly right, and that there's at least one mafia in scene, Joe, Bookwyrm, trent!)
((Except of course if mafia only skim the thread and/or find my posts too much work to read, and prefer waiting for the CliffsNotes, so never picked up on the opportunity...)) :(
GameRager: Ah what the hell....I am
town roleblocker.
Since no one has explicitly asked you yet: Did you leave any breadcrumbs in the early game to help you 'prove' this claim?
Why did you not wait until L-1 to claim?
Microfish_1: >Willing to lunch GOGtrial, he strikes me as fishy, his playstyle is too similar to that of Scum!HSL for me to be comfortable--though he was right about the sequence of events; I misread earlier. (HSL, if/when you read this, this is a compliment to you & your play in #57)
FWIW, I also consider this a compliment. (Also, have you ever played with town!HSL? Because my playstyle might also remind you of that, given how indistinguishable the two are for HSL.)
@ZFR: Did you already announce when deadline is? Saturday again? Sunday?