I mean, say it fast, and me too, ya know what I'm sayin? Know what I'm sayin? Me too, brother.

What cleared Lift and why Sage of all people?

You give me too much credit. :-)


Were you told this as fact by mod?



I dig your supplement's case.
Right now I think he would be by prefered vote then yog then ZFR but first 2 don't look to feasible ATM so I guess I should stay where I am.

I am going to unvote whatever I am doing for the moment but I'll be back soon if necessary.

ZFR.

Explain yo self please.

What is a "T T Lover"

Not sure how much of PM I can quote without getting into trouble, but yes, the way it was worded meant my lover was also T.

Dude. This is the easiest thing in the world.

Who is your lover?

From his hint earlier and the votes it has to be flub

Well, ZFR being shady and refusing to clarify is not a good look.

Trent, kinda wish you hadn't jumped the gun, there.

Do you believe his claim?

I thought he was hesitant to say because he didn’t know how much he was allowed to reveal. I could be reading it wrong since I usually get it wrong most times anyway :-/

Where did you get this?

He mentioned flub exactly once this whole thread and once quoted him on seemingly innocent post.

I'm willing to buy it... possibly.

But what Pokemon are you?

No.

Claiming your role is fine. If it's a role that involves another player directly, claiming the link to that player is fine.

Explaining flavor nuances or details in your PM is not okay.

Why?

A lover role might make sense, depending on the pokemon ZFR is (or claims to be), it's only one word from his PM (besides, it's basically his role name) so it shouldn't count as quoting but may well clear him.

If ZFR is actually town Lover with knowledge that the other Lover is also town, I actually understand why he doesn't want to reveal his Lover. If he gets lynched, both will die. If he doesn't get lynched, he is a prime NK target. But being the prime target he would also be a prime protection target. With a revealed second lover, scum would have twice the amount of targets and hypothetical protection roles would only have half the chance to protect the correct target. So, if that T-T Lover claim is true, don't try to reveal the second lover.

However, I have a bit difficulty believing the Lover+confirmed alignment combination. That would be Lovers and Masons at the same time. In a game where I was lover in the past, we had a chat but didn't know each other's alignment. And my lover turned out to be scum. So I see it as quite possible that ZFR is either wrong in his assumption that his partner is town. Or isn't town himself and is just using the lover role and how he handles it to try to buy town points.