LiquidOxygen80: This has to be the biggest overreaction in the history of overreactions. You DO realize that because ONE game that you have zero actual knowledge of WHY it was no longer pursued, isn't worth the completely hyperbolic reaction here, right?
Neobr10: One game? I don't think you have read the other threads in the first page. And i don't think you have been to the forum that often. GOG rejecting decent games is not something new, you know (they even backtracked in some cases, like with The Cat Lady, for example, whch was refused at first). At least do some research before calling it overreaction, would you?
And if you read my post carefully, i'm not exactly complaining about GOG's rejection of title X or Y. I'm complaining about the total lack of criteria. Stuff like Slender and Surgeon Simulator are accepted, while MUCH better games are not. Heck, we even had an unfinished game here (Dark Matter).
Except this wasn't even a rejection. This was a "we stopped pursuing this property." I honestly think you're missing the point, which was: "guys, if you're going to bitch at GOG for getting properties late, should you really still be bitching at them for NOT getting a game that's already "old" for an indie?" I can perfectly understand why people would be surprised, etc, don't get me wrong, but by the same note, we have absolutely ZERO idea of how well Surgeon Simulator or Slender sold, either.
I know I'm not interested in any of those three properties, but for every guy like me, there could be two or three guys who think one looks hilarious, one looks right up their creepy alley, and well...I'm not gonna say anything about Dark Matter. They clustereffed EVERY storefront with that game, and GOG wasn't the only one that got caught with their pants down either.
Maybe we just need one unified thread for rejections, that way people can sort of vote with their wallets without spamming up the forums? Would that make more sense?