It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
cristigale: Perhaps the two of you should consider counseling. ;-)
avatar
HijacK: Wait! What? Why should I consider counseling? O_o Cristi, you're my one and only!
I was referring to Lift and dreamler, sweetems. You're gold (as long as I'm not sleeping with the enemy.) ;-)
avatar
drealmer7: To me, krypsyn is the only one pinging some scumdar for me so far to any degree.
Oh noes!

Unvote: drealmer7
Vote: trentonlf

avatar
drealmer7: JMich, how do you feel about your partner? Is he a "good" lover, or is there a dirty taint upon him?
I am 31.43% sure he is cheating on me with someone else. We have a trust deficit, and no amount of chocolates or flowers is going to solve it.
I gotta say, I am playing so obvi-town right now. I am sure Vitek had me pegged as town a couple days ago, if he is following along. Seriously, I am pushing my towniness tells and tendencies to the limit. I am not sure what else I could do to be more town!

...

WIFOM's a bitch.
I also think yogsloth has possessed Krypsyn's body.....
avatar
trentonlf: I also think yogsloth has possessed Krypsyn's body.....
We swapped accounts a few months ago. Good job on being the first to notice! :)
Maybe this is not really a Lover's game, but an Invasion of the Body Snatchers
avatar
trentonlf: Maybe this is not really a Lover's game, but an Invasion of the Body Snatchers
Hey, you know what I just noticed? I voted for you after you voted for JMich! I wonder what [i[that[/i] could mean?!

Fun times, fun times.
avatar
Krypsyn: Hey, you know what I just noticed? I voted for you after you voted for JMich! I wonder what [i[that[/i] could mean?!

Fun times, fun times.
It means about the same thing as honey on ham I suppose LOL. I will admit I thought you were going to go after the people fishing after your surrealist comment.
avatar
trentonlf: I will admit I thought you were going to go after the people fishing after your surrealist comment.
Oh! That is a good theory. Wrong, sadly, but still a good one.

I think you might be reading too much into the surrealist thing. The punch line is 'a fish', as cristigale correctly posted*. The whole point of the joke was to point out that I thought asking for partners was fishing. However, it really isn't that much of fishing, in hindsight, so I think I may have overreacted.

What do you think?

*Well, technically she posted 'the fish', but I figure it is close enough.
avatar
Krypsyn: Oh! That is a good theory. Wrong, sadly, but still a good one.

I think you might be reading too much into the surrealist thing. The punch line is 'a fish', as cristigale correctly posted*. The whole point of the joke was to point out that I thought asking for partners was fishing. However, it really isn't that much of fishing, in hindsight, so I think I may have overreacted.

What do you think?

*Well, technically she posted 'the fish', but I figure it is close enough.
I got what you meant right away, my point was it's about as helpful to say who your Lover is as it is for 8 people to change a light bulb. Knowing the pairs of Lovers does nothing to help town at this point. As I said earlier, there are 4 pairs of Lovers we have a 50% chance of hitting scum no matter who we lynch so knowing pairs is rather pointless.
avatar
trentonlf: I got what you meant right away, my point was it's about as helpful to say who your Lover is as it is for 8 people to change a light bulb.
Ah! I thought you were calling me a Polack. :P (No, disrespect to Poles at all, it is just similar to how the joke goes)

avatar
trentonlf: Knowing the pairs of Lovers does nothing to help town at this point.
Heh.

avatar
trentonlf: As I said earlier, there are 4 pairs of Lovers we have a 50% chance of hitting scum no matter who we lynch so knowing pairs is rather pointless.
My math suggests differently.
avatar
Krypsyn: Ah! I thought you were calling me a Polack. :P (No, disrespect to Poles at all, it is just similar to how the joke goes)

Heh.

My math suggests differently.
4 pairs of Lovers, 2 Pairs have scum. You lynch anyone and you automatically remove a pair so there is a 50% chance that no matter who we lynch that we hit scum. You have to base it on pairs of people not individuals.
avatar
trentonlf: You have to base it on pairs of people not individuals.
I did.
avatar
trentonlf: I got what you meant right away, my point was it's about as helpful to say who your Lover is as it is for 8 people to change a light bulb. Knowing the pairs of Lovers does nothing to help town at this point. As I said earlier, there are 4 pairs of Lovers we have a 50% chance of hitting scum no matter who we lynch so knowing pairs is rather pointless.
I agree with this today. After the first lynch/flip, however, the pairs and who voted/pushed for whom will hopefully provide some clues.
avatar
cristigale: I agree with this today. After the first lynch/flip, however, the pairs and who voted/pushed for whom will hopefully provide some clues.
agree, and I hope we get lucky enough to lynch someone today who is scum or in a scum pair.