Posted September 24, 2015
Navagon: It sounds as if your 'review' was based on some vague 22 year old memories and not the GOG release.
That's a valid reason for removal by itself.
I think it was more like "5.99 for this game is too much." That's a valid reason for removal by itself.
Unless I am mistaken there was not too much else to it. Not even in amount of words.
Like the other deleted. They both offered the same opinion as the one "oone of my most favourite of all time but too costly for 5.99" that was kept, likely because it is just plainly much longer, better written and more funny.
@lonewolfgk; Feel free to correct me if I am wrong. Do you have perhaps the review saved somewhere? If so, could you post it here?