Posted July 01, 2019
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0423/a0423fb77e0aca9ef4d8cdf8b1d84891c9f856c0" alt="teceem"
teceem
Ack Ack Ack!
Registered: Apr 2013
From Belgium
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92f03/92f03f02af6d420a0ee159976e7296bccf6783f2" alt="idbeholdME"
idbeholdME
Doomed Space Marine
Registered: Jun 2016
From Czech Republic
Posted July 01, 2019
Up to the 144-165, it is noticeably smoother than 60 or 120 and I recommend it to anyone.
But anything above is pretty much pointless. Yes, it still cuts down a few ms of response time (less delay between frames) so it is technically like if you weren't playing at 30 ping but 26-27 for example. But the difference is less and less noticeable the higher you go. Yes, in 1 out of 1000 cases, those 3-4 ms could make a difference but is it worth it for anyone who isn't an E-Sports player? No.
And anyone telling you an eye can't see above 60 frames is objectively wrong.
But anything above is pretty much pointless. Yes, it still cuts down a few ms of response time (less delay between frames) so it is technically like if you weren't playing at 30 ping but 26-27 for example. But the difference is less and less noticeable the higher you go. Yes, in 1 out of 1000 cases, those 3-4 ms could make a difference but is it worth it for anyone who isn't an E-Sports player? No.
And anyone telling you an eye can't see above 60 frames is objectively wrong.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4daa5/4daa527bf5a285e8ee34723bb07ba59f2e5a2a00" alt="clarry"
clarry
New User
Registered: Feb 2014
From Other
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0423/a0423fb77e0aca9ef4d8cdf8b1d84891c9f856c0" alt="teceem"
teceem
Ack Ack Ack!
Registered: Apr 2013
From Belgium
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4daa5/4daa527bf5a285e8ee34723bb07ba59f2e5a2a00" alt="clarry"
clarry
New User
Registered: Feb 2014
From Other
Posted July 01, 2019
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3f5a/e3f5a96c67555d24b88cb85030593ad3002ae3dd" alt="avatar"
Post edited July 01, 2019 by clarry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f66f3/f66f30d73cd28b63821dd21e330903221386560e" alt="Crisco1492"
Crisco1492
Pseudo-PhD
Registered: Oct 2017
From Canada
Posted July 01, 2019
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62ad3/62ad3ad92d79d32672fa0d8ce0d0ec86e8e7d328" alt="avatar"
To answer the OP directly... I made the jump from a 30hz monitor to a 60hz monitor with this last laptop. Although the gameplay experience is better, generally, I've generally tried to balance gameplay with hardware capacities. Doubling the framerate means doubling the demand on your GPU, and that means you need more powerful hardware to play the same game. And even though the gameplay is smoother, since I game on a laptop I don't see the point in creating extra heat. As I mentioned above, you get used to having the lower frame rates after a while. Insisting on having 60hz (or 144hz) will mean compromises elsewhere, which (when you live in Indonesia or other hot areas) can be fatal for your motherboard. That's why, when I upgrade again and end up (most likely) with a 144hz monitor, I might still limit it to 60 or 90 FPS for more graphics-heavy games.
(As an aside... given that even today's top-of-the-line GPUs have trouble running The Witcher 3 at 60 FPS with "Ultimate" settings, I shudder to imagine the horsepower needed to run it at 144 FPS).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5c92/d5c92aaf937c665d13168a8a2ca391928610e51f" alt="Dark_art_"
Dark_art_
🔴I'm just glad that cows don't fly YO
Registered: Dec 2017
From Portugal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5c92/d5c92aaf937c665d13168a8a2ca391928610e51f" alt="Dark_art_"
Dark_art_
🔴I'm just glad that cows don't fly YO
Registered: Dec 2017
From Portugal
Posted July 01, 2019
Just a small head's up, doubling the Fps will double the GPU usage (you can lower the resolution to compensate) and the CPU usage as well, lower end CPU's can't really do more than 30fps on X game despite the GPU usage.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/949fd/949fd0864d2572515debf57e68db9c400fea9624" alt="saldite"
saldite
Dumb as hell.
Registered: May 2010
From United States
Posted July 01, 2019
I have a 144Hz GSync monitor, and while I don't necessarily play anything heavily competitive that would need it, I can certainly feel the framerate differences and try to go as high as I can to maintain smoothness. Dropping down to 60 feels super choppy for me for the first 15-30 minutes of playing something. After that, i tend to adjust or get use to it. That said, even for something like a TBRPG, I'd rather have the camera and animations at higher FPS if I can just to keep things smooth.
I think GSync made a bigger difference for me since FPS drops don't feel as completely choppy or nasty as they use to. I tend to adapt better to changes.
I think GSync made a bigger difference for me since FPS drops don't feel as completely choppy or nasty as they use to. I tend to adapt better to changes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f66f3/f66f30d73cd28b63821dd21e330903221386560e" alt="Crisco1492"
Crisco1492
Pseudo-PhD
Registered: Oct 2017
From Canada
Posted July 01, 2019
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/641d8/641d8722e04e7f55f34aa19d1e1be29cfd1bb61d" alt="avatar"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e309d/e309d235d92697da2712d1636dfdc5385a33d7d7" alt="avatar"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcca2/dcca26374968a42cd1707a0e58d8986e1ca703ee" alt="eric5h5"
eric5h5
New User
Registered: Jul 2011
From Other
Posted July 02, 2019
There have never been any studies which said that though. There have been some uneducated claims by random people, but any actual studies show there's no defined upper limit.
Post edited July 02, 2019 by eric5h5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/daea6/daea65be0db54c1b0a69714e12617939d95762ad" alt="Pouyou-pouyou"
Pouyou-pouyou
Gilius, dwarven pirate-druid, ship mast staff
Registered: Nov 2016
From France
Posted July 02, 2019
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9da0/a9da0d31422315fcb76a1b2785e34d0419681104" alt="MrElixer"
MrElixer
New User
Registered: Jun 2013
From United States
Posted July 02, 2019
Anyone who says your brain can't notice higher HZ is full of crap. I said that shit too before I bought a new monitor.
When I switched to my 144hz monitor it was mind blowing. Not so much at first, but when I played CS I noticed it was smoother—you begin to wonder why people aren't seeing you come around a corner as fast as you're seeing them.
Now, when I watch anyone play a game on 30/60hz it's laggy (like my son on his TV), almost like slideshow. It's crazy and hard to imagine I dealt with that for so many years.
Going from 144hz to 244hz isn't nearly as nuts as it was from the initial 30/60 to 144, but the difference is still noticeable.
Some people don't notice the difference at first, until they try to go back to a lower HZ.
There's no way in the world I'd ever go below 144hz again.
Higher HZ also does make a difference in some older games because depending on the monitor you got it can draw frames faster and it's just a bit more smoother experience.
If you have decent hardware you're wasting it by not having a higher HZ monitor at this point in time.
When I switched to my 144hz monitor it was mind blowing. Not so much at first, but when I played CS I noticed it was smoother—you begin to wonder why people aren't seeing you come around a corner as fast as you're seeing them.
Now, when I watch anyone play a game on 30/60hz it's laggy (like my son on his TV), almost like slideshow. It's crazy and hard to imagine I dealt with that for so many years.
Going from 144hz to 244hz isn't nearly as nuts as it was from the initial 30/60 to 144, but the difference is still noticeable.
Some people don't notice the difference at first, until they try to go back to a lower HZ.
There's no way in the world I'd ever go below 144hz again.
Higher HZ also does make a difference in some older games because depending on the monitor you got it can draw frames faster and it's just a bit more smoother experience.
If you have decent hardware you're wasting it by not having a higher HZ monitor at this point in time.
Post edited July 02, 2019 by Flesh420.613
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef204/ef204ab564a1d97009dbe17aea286e1fb18c9a5d" alt="StingingVelvet"
StingingVelvet
Devil's Advocate
Registered: Nov 2008
From United States
Posted July 02, 2019
I don't really notice above 60 to be honest. I have a 144hz monitor and I leave it in that mode because of G-Sync, but whether something is running at 60ish fps or 100ish fps I can't really tell. I just finished Alien Isolation, which ran around 100-120fps, and now I'm playing the Tomb Raider reboot, which runs around 60-70fps, and I can't tell a difference at all.
I do VERY much notice when I drop below 60 though. Maybe now with G-Sync I wouldn't notice dropping to 55 or so like I did before when I used V-Sync, but anything lower than that is very obvious I feel. I haven't played a locked to 30fps game in a long time because of the genres I play, but it definitely drives me nuts when it happens. In fact reading the OP and now knowing about Force Unleashed, that puts that game way back on the list of things to get around to. Bummer.
P.S. G-Sync is amazing and everyone should upgrade to it (or FreeSync). No more V-Sync stutter, no more increased input lag, no tearing, just smoooooooth as butter gameplay. It's amazing.
I do VERY much notice when I drop below 60 though. Maybe now with G-Sync I wouldn't notice dropping to 55 or so like I did before when I used V-Sync, but anything lower than that is very obvious I feel. I haven't played a locked to 30fps game in a long time because of the genres I play, but it definitely drives me nuts when it happens. In fact reading the OP and now knowing about Force Unleashed, that puts that game way back on the list of things to get around to. Bummer.
P.S. G-Sync is amazing and everyone should upgrade to it (or FreeSync). No more V-Sync stutter, no more increased input lag, no tearing, just smoooooooth as butter gameplay. It's amazing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36b86/36b86a8db7f6f01bc28a7d1fba6237c4e092b70a" alt="GamezRanker"
GamezRanker
Disagreement Verboten!
Registered: Sep 2010
From United States
Posted July 02, 2019
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3f5a/e3f5a96c67555d24b88cb85030593ad3002ae3dd" alt="avatar"
Well, in the context of movies there's just 25/30 fps or the very recent 60 fps. There's no (AFAIK) going beyond that threshold at the moment.
I know that there are a few 240 Hz gaming monitors out there. I can't really experience it without buying one - but I just can't imagine that with the kind of games I play and how I play them - that I'll ever notice much of a difference.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce3d5/ce3d58896a8508050e68df369e4c60ae8072baed" alt="avatar"
I think The Hobbit had 45 FPS.
Most people are probably fine with 100-120 Hz, so the now standard 144 Hz for high refresh rate monitors will suit anybody.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62ad3/62ad3ad92d79d32672fa0d8ce0d0ec86e8e7d328" alt="avatar"
One thing is that it depends somewhat on what you're used to. If all you ever played was 30fps, it can seem smooth. But if you then spend a significant amount of time with 60fps, going back to 30fps seems jittery. I don't currently have a monitor that goes past 60Hz, but when I had a CRT monitor, it could run lower resolutions (<1024x768) at 120Hz. I played Quake 2 like that for a while, and it was really slick. Going back to 60fps was noticeably less smooth, until I eventually got used to it again.
Note the requirement for VR to be >100Hz. Even if you think you can't really see a difference, your brain notices.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76098/76098ebf27c47ad335f8351c1c18a14c88cc331a" alt="avatar"
But anything above is pretty much pointless. Yes, it still cuts down a few ms of response time (less delay between frames) so it is technically like if you weren't playing at 30 ping but 26-27 for example. But the difference is less and less noticeable the higher you go. Yes, in 1 out of 1000 cases, those 3-4 ms could make a difference but is it worth it for anyone who isn't an E-Sports player? No.
And anyone telling you an eye can't see above 60 frames is objectively wrong.
Simply put: The body/brain has limits.
Post edited July 02, 2019 by GameRager