Ack, that couple of hours needs to extend a few more.

Real quick, @lxamyakxim - I am also curious why you voted yes to agent's mission choice and no to lift's mission choice.

@agent - why do you think drealmer is a spy? (you may have already answered, I read quickly)

Good to know that you play identically as Resistance and spy. I don't really believe you, but I've got no base to relate you to, so it might as well be true. At least in this game.

Not because of my superhuman good looks and intelligence? :'-(


Nope, I've not answered before. Reasons:

1. Point me to his walls-of-text. He posted a single small one, which I matched in size. Unusual.

2. Point me to his intricately, marvellously, conspiracy-theory-esque ideas. He's given none. Unusual.

3. Point me to where he piles on those who call him scum. I did it, very pointedly, and all he's done is pout and ignore me. Very unusual.

4. How often does he vote before knowing all of the facts. Or as close to all as possible. Yet he rejected my mission before even Asking what my reasoning was. Extremely Unusual!

5. Also, why is he so quick to like the proposed team. Just because he's on it? So he rejects Team 1, because I put myself on it, but he accepts Team 2, because he's on it. Suspicious and spyish. (Is that a word? Spyish, spy-y, spy-like, huh...)

Soooooo, yeah. He's playing totally contrary to his usual behaviour. I asked for feedback on my 3 options mainly to see how people would react, and he didn't. He should have.

My conclusion: drealmer7 is a spy.

Therefore, I don't like the proposed mission. And I doubly don't like it because HijacK didn't put himself on it.


@ HijacK - You ask for feedback? Take drealmer7 and JMich off of it, put myself and yourself or Brasas and yourself on it.

yepyep, my mistake, though I did know that there was a proper format for submission, so I'll blame little sleep + being out in the sun all day!

I honestly would feel better if you replaced Ix with Dess and/or yourself, but will still accept trying it as you said. Not 100% great feeling on anyone (more a good feeling about HijacK than anyone else atm) so, it's just a matter with going with what you think is best, seeing how it goes, and going from there. I get the feeling this game goes from suddenly not much feeling/idea of much to go on at all to a lot, and then it's just a matter of what to trust.

You not assigning yourself makes me take a slight little pause, but I do understand the gesture as well and do think it is a Resistance move/don't think a spy would do it at this point (and you especially.) So on top of that, I'd be more confident if you took the person off of the 4 you proposed to us you think is least likely Res.or more likely to be a Spy and put yourself in their place.

Yepyep, I think we mostly all know how that can be!!! a lot of times people with do their post, then do a refresh and type *refresh* in their post and then continue on with more if more has appeared or something similar.

I wasn't surprised how you voted after the exchange we'd gone through, my issue becomes now, if agent is a spy, what does that make of his 2 spy buddies?

I think this might be the #1 to be discussed atm. If so many people voted no, why is that?

Did spies see no spies were on it, and so 3 of the 6 "no" votes are spy, upping the odds to get that many "no" votes? if this were true it would mean JMich is Resistance.

Are the 3 spies agent, Lift, and Ix, and are those 3 yes's the hugest scum-tell of all time? such a thing makes me skeptical of it's likelihood, but it would certainly be nice, wouldn't it? If this is true, it means JMich is Resistance.

Lift voted yes, could be intentional in spy fashion way to do something, totally. Not trustin him at all. But if he is Resistance.

Ix voted yes, why did Ix vote yes? that seems most odd to me out of it all, is he a spy with a spy buddy on it?

Did agent's spy buddies see his mission proposal going down and also vote no? I could find this to be quite possible.

But no way to know anything still! GAAHH!

*ramble ramble*

HAH


did most of that and went afk for a few/got distracted, came back, and agent had posted his last msg...

this isn't even mafia

but, how is that for longer and more thinky stuff or whatever you expect from me?

anyway, I'm certainly trying to reduce the amount of repetitiveness and unnecessary excessive pontifications that don't sit well with everyone, it's not like I ever mean to go on and no and on, it just happens sometimes, can't help it!

sooo,

yeah, actually HijacK

After some further thought, I might actually like if Ix were not on the team quite a bit. He was seeming very Resistance, but then, a couple things seem off, especially that vote on agent's proposal, and I just get a funny feeling.

Good thing my vote submission isn't valid yet!

Lol.

You not making this easy for me, huh?

No, this isn't Mafia. But it provides many of the same opportunities as Mafia, so I expect you to take those opportunities.

Yeah, that's more what I expect. But I'd also expect a spy to get hisself in action and go back to his normal meta. Sorry.

I understand, and I think that's probably a good thing. But it'll be hard to pull off. And people (like me) might look at you suspiciously in the meantime.

K. So agent, drealmer, and brasas chimed in. Awaiting for the rest to come up with something substantial.

Could be quite a wait. We're into the weekend now, malheureusement.

Ugh. You're right. Still, I don't wanna put an official team there yet. I've been taking notes on what people think it's right. Nothing conflicting with my views so far, but some picks wouldn't be my first.

Good morning! Phone typing, so no quotes.

@ Brasas

You are new to forum mafia games here, right? Current game unrelated, I like your play style. This here is a compliment and more might come after the game.

@ drealmer7

Do you simply trust me more over lxamyakxim to be resistance or do you know me to be resistance and plan something by suggesting me as possible replacement in the team? I bring this is up because my name doesn't come up often, so if I am mentioned, it must be with a reason.

@ in general

I have another idea on how we can choose a team to gain good for resistance. Lets put our most mistrusted players on it (to a degree). Think of it this way: majority voted no for agentcarr16's proposal team because of not trusting captain enough (I know I did). What if I and the rest of us were wrong and agent is being painted as a spy for the rest of the game?

Lxamyakxim is confusing and hard to read. He posts little, votes in strange way. What if he actually is not a spy, but a very peculiar resistance fighter and player in general? Should we not trust him now, will we not trust him the whole game? Being resistance aligned, does not mean a player is/will not be crazy or unpredictable.

To give ourselves a better chance of success, HijacK should include himself on the team. He could very well be a spy, who wanted to stay in shadow by proposing a team with another spy and not himself.

Fourth person can be Brasas, JMich or drealmer7. Why:
- Brasas said to have played this kind of game many times, so he may know good ways for a spy to disguise himself just as much as good strategies for resistance to win.
- JMich gained a lot of unwanted attention from Brasas. There must be a reason - either a good read, or spy-painting. I doubt a spy would attack another spy in that manner.
- drealmer7 is expressing himself in a curious way. Walls of text are not needed here and I do not expect them, but drealmer is talking just the right amount which could be interpreted as "communicating with fellow spies in public". Also, he did not get FoS yet, besides agentacrr16. Expression + rather stable neutral position = who is drealmer?


Basically, I want Mission 2 to succeed, but in the longer term, I also want to be more sure if our FoS on certain players is right or not. If we wrongly accuse them of being spies this early and we are wrong, later missions are doomed to fail just because of lack of "trusted" players. So I am willing to put most distrusted players on the team now and to see if we are right or wrong. Spies are now in the corner where they should or must fail the mission, otherwise they get just one success away from loosing their goal. I think Brasas as a spy could be willing to pass a mission to gain super credit. And if mission fails with JMich on it, I also can't make a better judgement about Brasas than I can now. Drealmer is a different story, so my personal proposal would be:

HijacK, agentcarr16, lxamyakxim, drealmer7.

I included cristigale and Lifthrasil nowhere because I feel comfortable with them. Those two I trust and aiming for successful mission I would put myself, cristigale, Lifthrasil and someone else on the team. Maybe Brasas.

What do you think of it?

I think so. If all 3 of the mission 1 members were resistance, then the only way the 3 new members proposed for mission 2 to all be resistance would be if those not in any of the missions are all spies. Since you know you are resistance, at least one of the people in mission 1 and proposed mission 2 has to be spy.
Said assumption though requires two things to be true, 1) That all members on mission 1 were resistance and 2) That you are not a spy.

As to why I voted "hastily", I had just returned home at a bit after midnight, saw that a team proposal was going on (or in hindsight, discussed), and didn't want to delay the game by almost 12 hours (and another 6 or so until our mod woke up) by waiting to vote until I woke up. So sent a quick vote and went to sleep.

Time will tell.

Awww... shucks. :'(
Only thing that would break my heart harder would be Yogs saying that.

That's like the Mona Lisa of Texas U gastronomy!

I don't get this hookup culture shit... stop being such a cocktease please. One minute you don't like me, the next you're all wet for me. I'm too old for this Hijack. I'll just PM you my Craigslist profile ok?

PS: I seem to recall it's Texas, but in case that's my subconscious bias and not an actual memory I apologise to all the residents of the Lone Star state for such baseless slander of their eating habits and educational facilities.

;)

I find myself channeling Yogs more and more. Maybe more pacient though, pacient Yogs is not something I've really seen? Given the lack of physical reads, this approach does have positives. But I don't like how it might cement a certain trollish reputation I have for some around these parts. In real life I am aggressive at questioning votes, but not as pushy and offensive.

...

Or so I hope... [looks in pants to check his privilege]
Yup, still there.

You too? o_0
Craigslist profile on the way.

I was on this boat, but Hijack's team choice really rocked my world. JMich is cool as a cucumber, so I am very seriously watching him - there's a few things all adding up. And if it's those two, then dreamer makes zero sense as the third. I'm leaning harder on Ix, or maybe yourself in such case.

I really want JMich to comment on my posts so far. And I really want others to help me think if I'm missing something.

I'm pretty much going all in on the Hijack / JMich theory at this point. That does not mean I won't make other bets later if the info changes. So as mentioned, I see Agent as a possible third, but I honestly lean harder on Ix than Agent. Some of you are giving Agent a hard time because of the most (certainly a very) standard play in the resistance = "previous team + myself now"

Me way back - these folks are all too trusting. Why are they all voting yes? Are these two jokers voting no (you and Ix) spies that don't like that the first choice is all clean and terefore got caught in the open? But who's the third sneakier spy then? I know it's not me.

Me when folks were voting for agent's team - Crap, too many people using my bs as cover to become less trusting. Fine for meta, but the voting changes will be more murky in the here and now.

Me after seeing the votes - Too many no votes. Only valuable signal is Ix flip flop pretty much.

Immediately overwhelmed by me after Hijack goes bonkers - Oh crap, if Lift lucked onto two spies they wanted to vote no, but were probably afraid. Then they overreacted into distrust of themselves when riding the successful team would be natural just because they can't coordinate. Sucks to be them I guess as this is a really hard starting position, but gosh, ain't it lucky for the rest of us.


Gah... this helps and messes me up at same time. Since you're not a spy and I'm not a spy (duh) that would mean 3 out of Hijack, Cristi, Dess and JMich.

So first thing is you shouldn't like Hijack's team choice - Cristi and JMich both is too risky.
Second thing is as you point ouy, Hijack actually chose Ix. That really puts a wrench in my pet theory >:(

I'm leaving it here.

@all
Help?

PS: Dess and JMich posted but I can't answer right now. Will try to do so before leaving, but might take a few hours.

I don't think it will pass the voting phase. Agent is obviously suspicious of drealmer. Ixam attracted some attention from others for voting "yes" on agent's proposal, and people are mistrusting agent.

How about you substitute one of these players? And I still don't see what people have against cristi on the team.

I've been mulling it over, and an alternative would be: HijacK, Brasas, cristi, filler

Basically, if Brasas isn't spy, he will pass the mission. Cristi, I have good reads so far on her. I am obviously the captain. If you don't believe me check those awesome shoulders. Filler is whatever the consensus is for someone supposedly being resistance.

I have no whatsoever idea how you manage to get all these wild scenarios in your mind, let alone juggle with all of them at once and then draw conclusions. It's nuts. But rest assured, I am resistance. If anything, I am inclined to believe you are a milder version of drealmer. Would be interesting to watch you play an actual forum mafia game. I am pretty certain of how that would go, but nonetheless, I require observational evidence to support my theory.

This being said, I am quite curious to see you on a mission. How about this: Lift, HijacK, JMich, Brasas. If you are so adamant to say you are resistance, than this mission should succeed, no?

Thanks. But it's what you voted + how you voted. Not just the how being "hastily".

On the meat in front of me, I'd rewrite as follows:

Said conclusion though requires two things to be presumed true, 1) That all members on mission 1 were resistance and 2) That you are not a spy.

Which is a great start and shows you grokked where I was.

Then change one premise. As I'm really suspicious of Hijack but sure of myself: so not all members on mission 1 would be resistance, but I sure ain't no spy.
- What conclusions do you reach from putting yourself in my obvi-resistance shoes?
- What assumptions do we make for why Hijack didn't sabotage and why he is choosing who he is choosing? Choosing... he is kind of proposing, but not really, kind of captaining, but not at all...

Turns out I was wrong on our Hamlet... the bulletproof berserker actually is bulletproof (no lynch anywhere in the rules) but suddenly he is all scandinavian consultation on us and coily suggesting he's sooo happy for others to go get a taste of glorious success like he has already.

Suuuureee that's the hot blooded latin I know and hate to love ;)
He outed you unwillingly is my current best guess. Sucks to be you...

If lurking ain't intercourse, then indeed I was a virgin.

I like the way you're thinking, but will keep my eyes on the ball. Even if I'm right about both Hijack and JMich there's number 3 somewhere. And although it might not look like it from the way I'm pushing, it's not like I'm 100% sure of them being spies.

If only we could get down to business... it's only mission 2. And we have only two actual votes + one mission result.


Speak of the devil :)

Make it official and you'll know my vote soon enough. What I'll say now is that that would be fun as hell to see how others vote. So I like it. Please make that official. Please!

Also that you should know how I should answer.

For someone who literally said this is a team game, you sure want me to ask for no feedback. Perhaps that is your actual intention. I also find it peculiar how you just grabbed onto my read of JMich and drealmer, but have nothing to say about cristi, or ixam for that matter.

Pls. I'm Dacian.

I think you're full of shit and trying to throw us off.

Silence! Others still have to join the discussion.

Also, you're off the table. Your experience either precedes you and overthink this whole thing, or you're a spy. So far your votes have been random, arguments incomplete, and just utter ramblings that were worse than drealmer's in his first game.