Want to share any impressions on others?

Ever thought maybe that's what I'm going for? *wink* *wink*
Ah, just joking. Or am I? *sips Aloe juice*
Well, it has good pulp.

Why should I? I use my energy to exploit this opportunity.

To be bluntly honest, after a while it did give me a sense of achievement. It never stuck, but it's a nice badge to have. Better than those nonsense cloth wasting boy scouts badges they've been giving for years.

Back to the game now:

Uhm... I recall there were a few certain people long ago being vehemently against lynching newbies on day 1. Interesting how no one jumps on Dessimu for that in this game. I recall being jumped on the spot when I proposed the very same thing Dessimu proposed in this game.

Did I just kill the thread? I was expecting at least JMich and HSL to backtrack to flub's ranch game, iirc.

Good morning, good sober people of Wilderberry Hollow.

This could be read both ways when considering your current alignment.

Also, angry or not, I like how HypersomniacLive questions people and gives his insights. Because he made people talk and contribute more.

...

Before going to rest, I said I might change my vote onto another player. And that might be on drealmer7. He has has three votes already, lynch should be achieved, scum will say and lie whatever they can to stay alive and drealmer7 is a perfectly normal suspect. From my own personal view, suitable actions and Town helping ideas are what may have made him less of a suspect. Not the mad skills acknowledgement, not the asking for pardon. Proposition of no-lynch at this point benefits scum 100%, so I strongly dislike that.

Something about a4plz still smells funny.
Where did your enthusiasm disappear? What did you mean by out of a blue saying "What happens in scumtown, stays in scumtown"? This saying alone makes me believe more that you belong to Mafia.

...

Are you saying that something about me in particular is anti-Town for having proposed idea of lynching one of novices and not getting jumped on? Or is it that you proposed same idea, but were treated differently and that is unfair?

Who would you vote now, if anyone at all?

Game unrelated, Friends and TV talk:

I find Friends fun. My top TV shows would consist of something more criminal-like or adventurous. Like (in no clear order):
- Elementary
- Da Vinci's Demons
- Black Sails
- White Collar
- House M.D.

It's a matter of taste and personally, I try to respect it. You have yours, I have mine. Some of those things you mention, like "what is wrong with society, materialistic, narcissistic" amuses me. Watched House M.D. basically because House is one arrogant bastard, not because he is a mastermind.

If you have any good comedy related TV shows in mind, I am all ears.

I'm saying that it is quite curious how some people are ok with lynching newbies now. You see, that right there might be a scum tell. What if the newbie brought ahead for lynch is in fact town?

It was just worth pointing it out.

Right now? I don't know. I'm kinda itching for CSPVG, but that would lead nowhere.

I asked same question myself before voting a4plz. But what can I say? He acts in somewhat scummy manner, that makes him a valid suspect. Same question is also asked when voting seasoned players. So I choose to sort of ignore the "novice" part and treat them fairly.

What concerns CSPVG, I hope he will also cave out sooner rather than later. Nothing much to vote him for, other than lurking (for which reasons may be endless).

That's why I said I thought it was weak reason - there is more than one explanation. I think you're capable of playing in this manner from either alignment. Having reviewed your posts, the good outweighs the bad. Given your play so far, my initial suspicion is not a sound enough reason to vote for you today.

I also read trent's reply and can accept his reasoning. Which leaves a4plz. I don’t like voting for a new player but he is the only one really pinging my scum-dar.
Vote a4plz

No lynch is a bad idea. I would switch to drealmer to avoid no lynch, my concern is that drealmer feels like an easy target. While I don't agree with his no-lynch position, I find his reasoning for it mostly sincere. Asking to not be lynched seemed self-centered rather than town-centered, that was a slight ping.

Tomorrow is a long day. I’ll check in during lunch and should be around the last couple hours before the deadline.

@flubb - I know you're not big on meta, is your vote on drealmer based solely on play from this game?

@hyper – Is your vote staying on babark?

@JMich – What is your thought on no-lynch Today? Is there anyone you feel strong enough to vote?

@Hijack – Isn’t a vote a CSPVG a bit OMGUS? Do you really find him scummy?

@CSPVG – Do you find anyone besides Hijack scummy?

@Bookwyrm – Do you find anyone beside JMich vote worthy?

Why would it be? Just because he has a vote on me? Pfff. I find his justification for the placement scummy. He used similar "reasons" in his scum games to keep a vote on a person and when that person doesn't look likely to be lynched he is hard to account for in case a mislynch happens. It's like a broken record player at this point. "Oh, look, shiny RVS vote."
"Hmmm, initially, my vote was RVS, but I don't like XYZ 'cause it's no ZXY, and the key to more views from the 6 is for me to keep my vote where it is."

He also does this thing where he votes for lurkers, yet he is like Major Lurker in flesh and bone.

We shall remember this Day as the Day CSPVG got promoted in his rank!

Wait. What was the previous rank? Private Lurker?

I suppose so. Like in Lithuanian military, most of starting soldiers would have a rank of Junior Private, then get promoted to Private and so forth.

Lets ask the man himself:
@CSPVG: what's your current rank in the Lurker's Academy?

Pls, he's like the dean of students. Some Major or Lieutenant shit.

I.. don't see any link between my quote and your comment?