Well I see the game is now over....and sadly I was wrong on both my picks(joe and dedo), and the ones I mostly cleared were the "truscum".....I guess it's good I died early then? o.0
Lifthrasil: All in all: good job! It was an exciting game!
It was, and I tip my cap to you for tricking me, good sir. *tip*
Now the
observer thread.....eh, not so much(ghost town USA).
==================================
JoeSapphire: That does NOT mean we should make a habit of lynching GameRager early every game! If we're going to do that we may as well just ban him from mafia.
New rule: L.A.G.(Lynch All Gameragers)....it's the only way to be sure, is it not? o.0 ;D
JoeSapphire: What it means is we should accept the fact that "saying a lot of nonsense" is just not one of GameRager's scumtells.
Nonsense? Nonsense?!? Bah & ptooety, I say!
(Also sorry for suspecting you....it seems my getting it right streak from the one game didn't hold up long)
=============================
trentonlf: It’s often the case that people focus too much on setup or roles and lose sight of the actual gameplay.
Serious idea: Why doesn't someone make a game with all vanilla scum and town and list scum/town numbers at the start? That and other things might make people focus more on posts and less on setup, possibly.
============================
ZFR: I wasn't for particularly for lynching GR throughout the day (though I was willing to if no better candidates came forward). Because yes I agree his behaviour was NAI. Until post 294. The encouraging someone to lie was something new he introduced and meant that he was going to be a problem D2 (or he could be scum).
Look at my post 298. "(a) GR
started behaving suspiciously again, and". Up till that point I didn't particularly want to lynch GR based on his general behaviour, but his previous post is what caused it.
Why though? I get it...lynch all liars....but there should be exceptions to that, such as a town hiding a PR till the time is right.