Posted October 23, 2017
dedoporno
A bloody pirate!
dedoporno Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2012
From Bulgaria
HypersomniacLive
The Reluctant Voter
HypersomniacLive Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2011
From Vatican City
flubbucket
"Intoning"
flubbucket Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2012
From Micronesia
Krypsyn
The Anti-Hippie
Krypsyn Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Oct 2008
From United States
Bookwyrm627
ADD Jumping Bean
Bookwyrm627 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Nov 2013
From United States
Posted October 23, 2017
Bookwyrm627: 1) Does the new convert get read access when converted, or can they not see the scum thread at all until they start a night as scum?
dedoporno: This was already covered not long ago by HSL. They get nothing until the next night. You caught up, right? -HSL asked whether a Convert has full access to the chat. That could be read as having Read/Write access.
-The answer was that they only get access on the following night. That could be read as they can't even see the thread on the night (and following day) that they get converted.
I want to clarify whether a convert has read access for the Day after being converted. I'd been assuming they'd get the link to the (now closed) QT when they are informed they've been converted; they could read it that Day, but they couldn't post themselves until the following Night.
Hunter65536
New GOGlin
Hunter65536 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2014
From India
Posted October 23, 2017
Ah, miss being the one being quoted in such posts. I'll need to up my game to be deserving of that I suppose.
@bookwyrm What do you make of flub's play in general?
Also thinking further on scum teams actions if flub lives I am not entirely convinced it can bind scum to act in a way. Could post more if people want me to but in short I think it can lead to a scenario where scum would risk being killed to convert others so that flub makes it to d2 and we're not sure if his alignment has stayed the same or changed. Since there are no investigative roles it will be up to flub to convince us that he's not been converted or get lynched on d2 instead. Could be seen as postponing the inevitable and I could be wrong though, willing to hear out what others think of this.
Generally a prisoners dilemma problem as I had referenced in my previous post goes little something like this - there's 2 people caught for a crime but evidence is scant so police will need a confession to really prosecute them. Then they isolate both these prisoners and offer them a deal that if they talk and the other guy talks as well it'll be 1 year prison sentence for both. If you talk and other doesn't, then you'll get no jail time whereas the other gets 3 years jail time and vice versa. Then in final case if both of you don't talk then both of you will have to serve 2 years in prison. I feel that it applies here because both scum teams are being pushed to take a similar action, whereas the payoff in the former example is in terms of prison time here it will be a bit more in terms of risk they have to take by converting an unknown entity or sticking with a known entity with limited lifespan either because of suspicion on d2 or both scum teams choosing flub.
Here is a wikipedia link for the interested ones as I feel I did a shoddy job in terms of applying that concept here.
Can't beat that logic
Krypsyn: Trentonlf's voting patterns, as much as his rhetoric, have been giving me a metaphoric headache, and that is a big part of the reason my vote is on him now. However, no, that wasn't the trigger.
Interesting thing to say, but it looks like those Kyrpsyn points won't be mine :( @bookwyrm What do you make of flub's play in general?
Also thinking further on scum teams actions if flub lives I am not entirely convinced it can bind scum to act in a way. Could post more if people want me to but in short I think it can lead to a scenario where scum would risk being killed to convert others so that flub makes it to d2 and we're not sure if his alignment has stayed the same or changed. Since there are no investigative roles it will be up to flub to convince us that he's not been converted or get lynched on d2 instead. Could be seen as postponing the inevitable and I could be wrong though, willing to hear out what others think of this.
Generally a prisoners dilemma problem as I had referenced in my previous post goes little something like this - there's 2 people caught for a crime but evidence is scant so police will need a confession to really prosecute them. Then they isolate both these prisoners and offer them a deal that if they talk and the other guy talks as well it'll be 1 year prison sentence for both. If you talk and other doesn't, then you'll get no jail time whereas the other gets 3 years jail time and vice versa. Then in final case if both of you don't talk then both of you will have to serve 2 years in prison. I feel that it applies here because both scum teams are being pushed to take a similar action, whereas the payoff in the former example is in terms of prison time here it will be a bit more in terms of risk they have to take by converting an unknown entity or sticking with a known entity with limited lifespan either because of suspicion on d2 or both scum teams choosing flub.
Here is a wikipedia link for the interested ones as I feel I did a shoddy job in terms of applying that concept here.
Can't beat that logic
Krypsyn
The Anti-Hippie
Krypsyn Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Oct 2008
From United States
Hunter65536
New GOGlin
Hunter65536 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2014
From India
Posted October 23, 2017
So you have a strong reason to believe that trent is scum? Still isn't very much different from your other votes unless you explain why you'd think that.
Lifthrasil
Bring the GOG-Downloader back!
Lifthrasil Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2011
From Germany
Krypsyn
The Anti-Hippie
Krypsyn Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Oct 2008
From United States
Posted October 23, 2017
Hunter65536: So you have a strong reason to believe that trent is scum? Still isn't very much different from your other votes unless you explain why you'd think that.
...mchack
more than enough!
mchack Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2014
From Germany
Posted October 23, 2017
I will not double post again!
reread #319 and it's certainly not in there...
I haven't asked that. Never will. But you just know that? how?
Trust in masons, is what krypsyn says. They'll know.
---
Now for something fun :) ... D'n'D? or Cat Videos? oh, I know let's play mafia!
---
Do you think flub is scum or town, right now?
If you think he is town, do you intend to vote for him?
Who do you think is scum this dusk? ... remember you never know what happens at night, you might want to go on record, before night hits, because no one knows who'll wake up again tomorrow...
nope, the recruiter dies. see the setup.
to my knowledge no-one did play against his current goal in #51. Do you mean bookwyrm or flubs? they're in this game too, we should ask them.
@flubs, @bookwyrm: Did either of you play against your own win condition last game, in the hopes of acquiring other win conditions someday and to not hurt those?
But mostly. Remember: even, when we have a conversion tonight, you can in no way be sure it was flubs. Could just as well be you getting converted. We'll have to reassert everyone. flubs included, but not only flubs.
what?
Wait, isn't dedoporno your #2 scum? Why mention him separately from the collective scum that "also" has an idea who a town vanilla might be? I was talking to him. I feel it brings the point across better. As in: I know something, You know something, other people will know something, too. If he thinks about it and knows something, he'll concede other people probably know something, too.
simply rethoric....
----
how so?
At worst, Flub is vanilla town. At best, he's scum. Either way, he needs to die, especially since we don't know if we're actually doing scum's work for them.
Don't worry Flub. If you're town, you can win or lose with me. *emphasis added*
it is in the gamesetup. My premise is: scum can read. nothing has changed by that comment.
lol, ok good you're enforcing your seat in my scumreadlist #3. How is it that flub needs to die now, that you realized he can trip up scum?
let's say he's scum then scum(teamB) can die by neglecting the possibility. let's say he's town, scum can die by trying to convert him(N2) (or loose their shot for nothing(N1))
How exactly is it that flub has to be lynched now and can't be left for scum to trip over?
yes, and that makes it better to lynch town how?
"mchack: ... I think we all play this game to win and that includes flubs, too"
"flubbucket: MOAR BULLSHIT!!!11!!1
This is a game.
I play games for fun."
Bookwyrm627: PPE: And Mchack sort of already covered this in 319. Also, that post highlights a somewhat disturbing trend in more than just mchack: an almost assumption that scum will be able to pick which kind of target they're going to hit (mason, vanilla, scum) [Oh good. HSL is on top of this].
where did I say that scum will be able to pick which kind of target they're going to hit? reread #319 and it's certainly not in there...
Bookwyrm627: You "suspect" the first scenario is better for town? Is there any case, at all, where the second scenario is better?? I really hope someone else has already commented on this.
yes the first is better, but if you want hypothetical scenarios: if the two nk are masons but the one nk and one conversion is two vanillas, then the second option is better. I haven't asked that. Never will. But you just know that? how?
dedoporno: but I don't see how claiming mason is such a good play for scum (well, they will probably avoid the immediate lynch but in the long run they are likely to go down anyway, since there are these new threats for them).
Bookwyrm627: The long term is irrelevant if they get lynched now. ---
Now for something fun :) ... D'n'D? or Cat Videos? oh, I know let's play mafia!
---
HypersomniacLive: dedoporno may never have voted flubbucket, but he's not averse to it if need be. Besides, isn't he he scum for you?
his being scum or not, doesn't change anything in that context. But sure, seems he is in the "would lynch townie, if possible" category... HypersomniacLive: ZFR changed his vote to trentonlf awaiting the latter's explanations, i.e. if he's satisfied with them he may well go back to flubbucket.
may or not. who knows. HypersomniacLive: I've not voted for anyone so far; what does it prove in relation to not having voted flubbucket?
This is a good point. I asked for your reads before. Now I think is a good a time as any to go on record. Do you think flub is scum or town, right now?
If you think he is town, do you intend to vote for him?
Who do you think is scum this dusk? ... remember you never know what happens at night, you might want to go on record, before night hits, because no one knows who'll wake up again tomorrow...
HypersomniacLive: Taking things out of context doesn't make your counterargument strong(er), or even stand.
true. don't know that I have though. He lists players as if they are backing his thoughts, but I'm the only one averse to them. I just wanted to show, that their backing doesn't go so far as to vote accordingly. nope, the recruiter dies. see the setup.
mchack: [...] Working against your current team on the off chance it may change is not something anyone will do. [...]
HypersomniacLive: You speak in awfully strong absolutes as to what others would and would never do. Which is doubly noticeable since you were in game #51, and experienced first hand how some people played for that off chance. @flubs, @bookwyrm: Did either of you play against your own win condition last game, in the hopes of acquiring other win conditions someday and to not hurt those?
HypersomniacLive: Yeah well, being irked by someone and actually scum-reading them is not exactly the same thing. And this is aside the fact that it came later with the sort of preface I always love to see.
true. though there was not much to read from bookwyrm, yet was there? and the truth of it is still, that it's simply false to state, I'd only OMGUSed adalia and dedo all game, wouldn't you say? But mostly. Remember: even, when we have a conversion tonight, you can in no way be sure it was flubs. Could just as well be you getting converted. We'll have to reassert everyone. flubs included, but not only flubs.
what?
mchack: [...] You sure have an Idea who some might be and scum definitly also has an Idea who might be a vanilla. [...]
HypersomniacLive: [emphasis added] Wait, isn't dedoporno your #2 scum? Why mention him separately from the collective scum that "also" has an idea who a town vanilla might be?
simply rethoric....
HypersomniacLive: [emphasis added]
Do tell, what makes you so sure that scum definitely have an idea about the vanillas?
They read the thread, same as we do. it doesn't take a genius to form opinions about people from the way they talk. Scum do that. Doesn't make the Ideas correct, but do you really, seriously suggest scums only option is flubs? They won't consider others? Do tell, what makes you so sure that scum definitely have an idea about the vanillas?
----
Bookwyrm627: C doesn't stop any conversions, and may enable one. Even if we could kill 3 scum on Day 1, that would still leave a conversion open to hit a claimed vanilla.
yes it does. it removes one conversion from the game forever. Only four conversions can happen this game. With adalia dead, it's only 3 how so?
mchack: "Someone targeted by two recruitments at the same time, dies."
flub will simply die. no liability anymore and better yet, two scumshots wasted on one townie.
So who here is really thinking it would be a great thing, to remove this complexity from scum? who here thinks it is townie to do scums work and let scum have a free pick at all the other seven town players tonight?
Bookwyrm627: I was actually considering moving my vote for precisely this reason. Now that scum have been reminded of this possibility, there is no point in keeping him alive. -.- flub will simply die. no liability anymore and better yet, two scumshots wasted on one townie.
So who here is really thinking it would be a great thing, to remove this complexity from scum? who here thinks it is townie to do scums work and let scum have a free pick at all the other seven town players tonight?
At worst, Flub is vanilla town. At best, he's scum. Either way, he needs to die, especially since we don't know if we're actually doing scum's work for them.
Don't worry Flub. If you're town, you can win or lose with me.
it is in the gamesetup. My premise is: scum can read. nothing has changed by that comment.
lol, ok good you're enforcing your seat in my scumreadlist #3. How is it that flub needs to die now, that you realized he can trip up scum?
let's say he's scum then scum(teamB) can die by neglecting the possibility. let's say he's town, scum can die by trying to convert him(N2) (or loose their shot for nothing(N1))
How exactly is it that flub has to be lynched now and can't be left for scum to trip over?
mchack: Even if we lynch flubs, two town vanilla can get converted and we have 6 scum instead of 5 (if we lynch adalia and the same happens).
Bookwyrm627: Two town vanilla could be converted regardless of whether we lynch scum. Bookwyrm627: Both your links show him saying he plays for fun. Neither link shows him saying he does not play to win.
look again! the second one: see what he answers to : "mchack: ... I think we all play this game to win and that includes flubs, too"
"flubbucket: MOAR BULLSHIT!!!11!!1
This is a game.
I play games for fun."
Krypsyn
The Anti-Hippie
Krypsyn Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Oct 2008
From United States
Posted October 23, 2017
HypersomniacLive
The Reluctant Voter
HypersomniacLive Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Sep 2011
From Vatican City
Posted October 23, 2017
Lifthrasil: Yes, it is. And yes this means from Wednesday on, European late morning/noon, Nightfall may happen. I'll be quite busy on Wednesday, so it will probably rather be Wednesday evening (European time). But I will not state a precise deadline.
Well, you could simply say European late afternoon/evening and that still wouldn't be a precise deadline. It is of course up to you, it's just that I'd like to be around for EoD, and European late morning/noon doesn't work for me. May not work for those across the pond either, but not speaking for them. Then the Convert's PM in the setup document is misleading, as it currently gives them the link to the QT.
flubbucket
"Intoning"
flubbucket Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2012
From Micronesia
Posted October 23, 2017
mchack: ..............
@flubs, @bookwyrm: Did either of you play against your own win condition last game, in the hopes of acquiring other win conditions someday and to not hurt those?
...............
Why would I ever do such a thing??@flubs, @bookwyrm: Did either of you play against your own win condition last game, in the hopes of acquiring other win conditions someday and to not hurt those?
...............
mchack
more than enough!
mchack Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Dec 2014
From Germany
Posted October 23, 2017
I will not double post again!
Hunter65536: Also thinking further on scum teams actions if flub lives I am not entirely convinced it can bind scum to act in a way. Could post more if people want me to but in short I think it can lead to a scenario where scum would risk being killed to convert others so that flub makes it to d2 and we're not sure if his alignment has stayed the same or changed. Since there are no investigative roles it will be up to flub to convince us that he's not been converted or get lynched on d2 instead. Could be seen as postponing the inevitable and I could be wrong though, willing to hear out what others think of this.
the "get lynched on D2 part" and "could be seen as postponing the inevitable" is what bothers me, sure it may be the case. or not. Maybe the actually converted player slips up. and we lynch him. or we get interesting info by the flips and go after someone revealed by that? there is more than one scum out there and we should go after the scummiest. if that happens to be flubs D2 ok. if not why force it, to make him to lynch? we can't be postponing the inevitable, if nothing in this setup is inevitable. We'll have to go day by day and react, to the new info we get through each lynch and each flip. Everyday trying to hit scum. that's the way to win in my opinion.