The Greater Good
Lifthrasil: [...] Not really. You just give the more useful answers. [...]
And yet, it was not directed at me either.
Lifthrasil: [...] However, trent reacting in this way is consistent with previous games. [...]
As opposed to Bookwyrm627 soft-claiming something on D1 (as town)? And it's consistent for trentonlf as what alignment?
Lifthrasil: [...] Case 2: he is town and tries some stupid ploy, counting on everyone understanding what he does and what he wants other PRs to do. And 'forgets' again that the CL reads everything as well and has the same chance of understanding whatever ploy that is than all the others. [...]
Doesn't "everyone" include the CL by definition?
Lifthrasil: Yes. You (and apparently Bookwyrm) missed the 'should'. That's not a 'has to'. [...]
Rule #13 is also worded with "should". Does it make the rule optional, or does it make it another 'rule'?
Also, rule #7 says "Please remember to bold your votes and unvotes [...]". Does it mean that vote(s)/unvote(s) count regardless?
Lifthrasil: [...] and at least my PM didn't tell me anything about having to follow this 'rule'. [...]
As opposed to your PM telling you that you have to follow all the other rules?
Bookwyrm627: [...] Exhibit C:
JMich: 19a. While a roll call is going on, you cannot start a second one.
An NWA member would not be doing that. Bookwyrm627: Note the bolded part (bolding provided by me). [...]
Do you know what determines when and how a roll call has ended?
Bookwyrm627: [...] Easy peasy, lynch-to-win.
Vote Sage.
Heh.
*reads post #129*
No voting trentonlf, like you did Sage103082?
Bookwyrm627: the Greater Good.
I did not expect Hunter to slip in there while I was proof-reading.
Rule #19 also says:
JMich: 19. [...] Be aware that non NWA members may also post it or attempt to start a roll call, so be careful not to fall in the imposters' trap.
Should I assume you're confident enough that Hunter65536 is a NWA member? If so, why?