And if that's true, my stance on what I said at the beginning of the game, relating to drealmer, still stands and I think you should give it a shot. There will be many situations which you pretty-public-by-now bias will be exploited and games will be lost. The game and possibilities sometimes have to be taken at face value. The key is identifying when these times are occurring.

At first skim, I see we had somewhat of a bomb drop by trentonlf.

Have to go back to catch up properly, then look into this closer, but first comment on this - interesting that trentonlf uses the term "bad guy" for HijacK; not Mafia, not scum.

Sometimes.

Naughty Naughty.......You're pulling this out of context.

Whose question I was answering??

Current votes:
HijacK - trentonlf; Lifthrasil; JMich; Sage103082
Lifthrasil - HijacK

Not voting: HypersomniacLive; dedoporno; cristigale; flubbucket

Majority has not been reached.

Deadline tonight, 10:30 pm Eastern Daylight time, extended a few hours if necessary until I'm ready to go to bed. As stated earlier. Be kind to the European contingent and decide early! No guarantee enough will be on at deadline to reach majority! Of course, no-lynch is always an option! So is lynching the first person to suggest it!

I've already answered why I unvoted HijacK.

I reckon he is suffering form a case of drealmerities acutis.

As I said, I will be more disinclined to trust some people than other but that doesn't mean I will never ever end up working with them. I like to think I don't let bias get the better of me, I just use it to make sure I don't get blind-sided.


What do you make of trent's accusation then?

Answer my question first.

Kind sir, I will say that scum, or at least those that I think are scum, I may yet be wrong, have won with an unsettling argument that is not related to the game and which I believe infringes on the integrity of the game and values of the mafia community here. Just my two cents. Alas, apologies if it seemed I flipped at you at times. I'm just frustrated with the nonsense people have claimed thus far. All I know is that even if I wanted to enact change, some people will always just bring the worst in me to surface because they deserve nothing but the worst of me.

trentonlf as well as Sage103082 make clear statements regarding HijacK's alignment.

How can they both know?? I'm not doubting them, just curious. I think it is valuable information useful for catching scum and exonerating townies. A pool of cleared town is critical.

Sorry, which question is that again?



This one? HSL? Is this a scolding that I walked in on your convo?

Based on the flip we got.

Yet when he unvoted HijacK, you had nothing to say. Like when trentonlf first brought up and voted drealmer7 for his "slip", the only thing you had to say was to advice him to bold his vote.


But when she made that multi-post case, your only comment was that she (re-)raised some good points; you seemed more than happy that she kept the focus/pressure on HijacK, and said nothing about the way she went about to do so.

Also, since Sage103082 feels off only Today in relation to her questioning HijacK, does her "you're trying to make trentonlf unvote drealmer7" push she made on me when I was questioning trentonlf, and the little exchange we had on it read fine to you?


Do you think that there are only two different mafia factions then, and Sage103082 is on neither of them?


Do you think that JMich in particular would write something new just to appear to be adding something new to the discussion?


Weren't you the first to say that the first thing that "Muscle" brings to mind is Strongman? Is a Strongman kill performed without a gun? Did you change your mind about "Muscle"=> Strongman? If so, what method of killing do you think fits "Muscle"?


You are way too late to this party.



Initially my question was if you think it safe to be so stark about the likelihood of a given role to be in play based on your own PM (assuming you're truthful about it, that is), given that this is a role-madness game hosted by RWarehall, and that we have nothing else to work with than the two claimed Death Millers. But your post #773 reads to me that it's more that you don't believe HijacK to have said role, than it being that unlikely to be in play.



I'd like to hear that comment now.



[emphasis added]

Do you think that "Divorce Attorney" was adaliabooks' role? If so, what more traditional role/abilities do you think fit a role titled "Divorce Attorney"?

My only issue was your pulling something out of context.

HypersomniacLive's question was hypothetical as was my answer.

You framed it as relevant to current game conditions.



(off to work before I'm late)