You forgot to ridicule Vitek; 50 DKP minus!

Drat...my bad..... 9. If you are not a player or mod don't post in this thread at all except to heckle Vitek.


/heckles Vitek and then waves

You need to host your game.

Slacker.

I'll even help with the set-up, Sage103082. Make it Kitty Mafia, and make me the sniper kitten: SK, 10Xbulletproof, 10Xlynchproof. Make anyone else whatever you want... I'll just God Mode it anyway! Booyah!

:)

Everyone loves me!!


*Waves frantically at Sage*
Nice to see you!!!


What is your answer to Bookwyrm's question, why should we not lynch you?

Ohai! Hope you are well!

If you want to play I'll just modkill **** and let you have at it! Just say the word! ;)

I'll be Mafia Obvitown (Neutral Gender Bender).

Or 2 millers, jesters, framers as far as I can see. (Instead of baddies or doctors)

It wasn't a non-vote because if I didn't find anyone worth voting I'd say we go for no lynch as opposed to lynching someone just because we have to.

Here, let me try:

"If you are reading this, I have likely been supping spam. Traitorous scum, scum here! And cops, and two orioles, though one is a novela and the other juicy. And vanilla! Also, chocolate! And ask yourself, why is Putin so jealously secreting away the mass extinction? It makes no sense! Help us, Noobi-Wan, you’re our only hope! Somebody’s poisoned the waterhole!"

Hmmmm...nope, I don't think that's it either. It must mean something though! Right?

I will confess I was hoping someone would go back and compare the opening post to the original Tommy Saturday claim - purely for amusement. Anyway...

<The players glanced around - through a tiny skylight far overhead, not part of the original structure and inserted here for narrative convenience, they observed the sun had reached it's zenith. The useful part of the day was 3/8 over. After an initial flurry of activity just after daybreak, and then some scattered jostling, things had settled in. One could almost imagine they weren't trapped in the scene of a tragic crime with the killers still almost certainly mingling amongst them.

So with no urgency facing them, the players all decided to take a siesta and dream sweet dreams. The troubles of the world could be picked up again after a nice long nap. Krypsyn had a wonderful dream about the Easter Bunny bringing him habanero sauce, while nearby flub had a wonderful dream about a Playboy Bunny bringing him some sugar. Drealmer had a nightmare about bunnies invading his organic garden and eating his cabbage!

Many dreamed that a wonderful old friend stopped by to visit, and were left feeling quite comforted. And somewhere else, a diabolical mod (adalia, obviously) observed their malaise and torpor and debated whether to apply a touch more pressure. After all, the mod had said "currently set" quite deliberately, to leave the door open to revise it. You see, his magic powers (what?) were fed by the momentum and other energy created in forum mafia. The prospect of those powers waning was...disagreeable...>

Siesta-time Vote Count (unchanged since prior):

With 11 alive it takes 6 to lynch / no-lynch
1. Drealmer
2. Krypsyn
3. Trent
4. Bookwyrm
5. RW
6. flub
7. CSP (3) - Krypsyn, Wyrm, RW
8. JMich
9. dedo
10. cristi
11. Hunter (2) - flub, dedo
12. Mr. Nolynch (1)- Hunter

Unvoters, unite! - trent, csp, cristi
Not gonna do it, wouldn't be prudent: JMich
In a league of his own: Drealmer

CSP is still closest to lynch at L-3.

You have a deadline:
It is currently set for 10 am (PST) on Monday, March 28, 2016 in the year of our Lord, but starting to tick backwards towards 8:30 am.

It happened.

The clock has now been shifted ever so slightly. For now.

The current deadline is now: 9 am (PST) on Monday, March 28, 96 hours from game launch, roughly 58 hours in the future.

When you say several people are trying to distract from his wagon, who do you mean? I take several to mean at least 3 or more.

You have not outright said it, but I read what you are suggesting as STU. If I'm wrong about that, I apologize. My preference is to select someone I find scummy over someone I (simply) believe is not contributing as much as others. If no one else stands out, a lurker is a decent option. If no one else stands out, there may be a better chance it is someone who is lurking.

I think your question is loaded, but to answer it: because I have not seen CSPVG do anything I find scummy. Secondarily, because he has good observations when he shares. And a very distance third reason, I find his humor refreshing.

Again: what has CSPVG done that you find scummy?

I’m not against lynching CSPVG per se. The original push on him felt too rushed, hence the vote. At this point, we probably need to hear CSPVG's answer to your question. If his explanation is not convincing, I will be OK voting for him. If he doesn't answer, that is also a reason to vote. My current concern of lynching CSPVG: if he flips town, do we learn anything useful about the remaining players?

@cristi what does STU mean?