It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Dessimu: If someone claimed to have survived an attack, it would only confirm that Town has another protective role. While in reality, we have a dead SK and we already assume we have some protective role.
Assumed and confirmed are not the same. Neither for us, nor for scum.



avatar
trentonlf: I was answering HypersomniacLive's question, what do I need to reconsider?
That:

avatar
trentonlf: I never asked anyone to share a failed attempt on their life. I asked anyone to share pertinent information, like flub did.
avatar
trentonlf: If it really was a failed attempt on someones life then I would hope that person would speak up, if they have some details to share, so we could have something more concrete to work with.
These 2 sentences are quite contradictory to one another, wouldn't you say?
I'm not a fan of no lynch this quickly, let's take a look at all possible candidates. If there's 3 scum we have 50% chance of scoring a hit even randomly so I assume our chances will be higher if we analyze a bit.

@dedo You said "This should be correct" when flub said me and dessimu were clean, did you know before? (Not an accusation, was just wondering why you were going after me a bit hard yesterday. We both were your suspects on d2 so I'm a bit surprised)
avatar
Dessimu: If someone claimed to have survived an attack, it would only confirm that Town has another protective role. While in reality, we have a dead SK and we already assume we have some protective role.
avatar
dedoporno: Assumed and confirmed are not the same. Neither for us, nor for scum.

avatar
trentonlf: I was answering HypersomniacLive's question, what do I need to reconsider?
avatar
dedoporno: That:

avatar
trentonlf: If it really was a failed attempt on someones life then I would hope that person would speak up, if they have some details to share, so we could have something more concrete to work with.
avatar
dedoporno: These 2 sentences are quite contradictory to one another, wouldn't you say?
I said if they have some details to share, as in if they were given some clues as to who tried to kill them. I was not saying please speak up so we know there's a doctor of some sort in the game.
avatar
Leonard03: I might be persuaded to no-lynch, bu I've been suspicious of flub all game.
Why? I find your suspicion to be suspicious. Doing reading on you now.

avatar
dedoporno: I believe Trent is also Town.
Do you find trentonlf to be scummy now?
avatar
Hunter65536: @dedo You said "This should be correct" when flub said me and dessimu were clean, did you know before? (Not an accusation, was just wondering why you were going after me a bit hard yesterday. We both were your suspects on d2 so I'm a bit surprised)
You were, yes.

You were cleared to me on Lift's flip. Your stance towards me was heavily defensive and dependent on Lift flipping scum so I would be "proven" as one by extension which in turn would clear you. If you are scum you would have known both Lift and I would flip as Town so your OMGUS would have made no sense at all. If Lift flipped scum I would have assumed that you were scum with him and bussed him given he was already a dead man walking and set me up in the process for Today.

I'm pretty sure that flub and Dessimu are not scum together. They are either enemies or both Town not knowing what the other is. I already spoke of how Dessimu was adamant on voting for flub for so long from the very beginning. Taking so strong position against a scum buddy is quite risky and could end up throwing a wrench in your operation for no reason. On the other hand we have flub's strong believe of Dessimu being Town looking for scum when there were decent reasons to suspect otherwise.

A scum flub vouching for 2 townies that were among the most likely lynch targets for Today when we have done nothing but mislynch so far seems crazy. It makes a lot more sense to push them over and go for the win Tomorrow.


If any of this is part of an elaborate ruse I'm fine with losing to such a masterful play.
@dedo Thanks for explaining! Shows me I still have a lot to learn.
avatar
trentonlf: I said if they have some details to share, as in if they were given some clues as to who tried to kill them. I was not saying please speak up so we know there's a doctor of some sort in the game.
Absolutely! People saved by power-roles are constantly told "Yeah, John tried to murder you in your sleep, but his attempt was foiled".


avatar
Dessimu: Do you find trentonlf to be scummy now?
More than before, yes. I just realized what the potential repercussions of someone answering his question back then could have been and I don't like that. But when I said I believed he was Town I really did. The whole way he played and interacted with others felt like Town-Trent I've seen in the past.


avatar
Hunter65536: @dedo Thanks for explaining! Shows me I still have a lot to learn.
These are just deductions based on what is happening. I've been terribly wrong in the past as well, it just looks a bit more solid this time around.
avatar
dedoporno: Absolutely! People saved by power-roles are constantly told "Yeah, John tried to murder you in your sleep, but his attempt was foiled"
I'm not going to keep arguing with you, you are reading it wrong is all I can say.
avatar
trentonlf: I'm not going to keep arguing with you, you are reading it wrong is all I can say.
It's possible. But I may also be reading it right and I can't just ignore that possibility.
There are so many things about Leonard that, if given a thought of him being scum, look indeed very strange.



avatar
Leonard03: Last game everyone's name was open information. I don't see why it matters so much more this game?
avatar
Leonard03: Considering that last yogsloth game the demon was part of town, I don't think it is wise to put too much stock in who is who.
avatar
Leonard03: I understand what you are saying, but disagree, because I think it is flavour. And thus has no bearing on things.
avatar
Leonard03: So you think there are game mechanics based on what people's names are? That seems highly improbable.
Keeps making his point that names are not important, sharing them gives nothing good. And then in the same post:
avatar
Leonard03: I would be in favour of everybody sharing their names and dislikes.
Explaining later:
avatar
Leonard03: Well considering how much of a hullabaloo has been made over it, may as well have everyone share their info.
I guess the probably suspicious thing here is how quickly Leo changed his opinion when just recently making a stance of against importance of our names.



How Leo came to hammer drealmer:
avatar
Leonard03: Dead line is approaching so I think it's vote time.
Vote: flubbucket
avatar
Leonard03: I don't like quick-hammers. They're bad, don't you think so Krypsyn? :P
avatar
Leonard03: So, any talking left to do? Or do we finish this now, and see what tomorrow brings?
avatar
Leonard03: Let's get the night over on the weekend.
Vote: drealmer
Because he has made some strange arguments over the PM flavour, as well as rapidly approaching deadline.
avatar
Leonard03: Ok, I gave you the benefit of the doubt and took a look at the other names but I saw nothing. You seem to be reaching for straws.
Unvote: flubbucket
Vote: drealmer
And on Day 2:
avatar
Leonard03: Oops.
And then…
Wow.
avatar
Leonard03: Oops for hammering drealmer, and wow for having a SK killed N1.
Also, my first thought on the blood on the floor was that someone (like the SK's target) was saved by the doctor.
Speaking of "wow" and looking back, post 170 looks interesting (why particular interest of CSPVG's vote on Krypsyn?):
avatar
yogsloth: Krypsyn (1) – CSPVG
Leonard (1) – Krypsyn
avatar
Leonard03: What exactly are the reasons for these votes?
More interesting, how later Leo answers about asking about Krypsyn's vote:
avatar
Leonard03: I didn't ask Krypsyn because he usually doesn't share anyway so I didn't feel like wasting the breath (I'm pretty sure I made some comment on it though). As for trentonlf, I just get a little bored of asking people to give reasons for their votes. If he is really serious about it he's going to have to convince people with something, so I can counter it then.
Regarding drealmer's hammering:
avatar
Leonard03: Eager? I think there was less than 12 hours on the clock and I sure didn't want a no-lynch. IMO he wasn't a bad lynch either, as he had been acting a little scummy.
I feel like I would be grasping at straws here, but vote on flub was not RVS, yet not based on reasons, only the deadline. I did not count it, but I think we still had some hours till the deadline (look how eagerly we discussed things when Lift's deadline was coming up). If Leo was town, I find it suspicious to condemn drealmer because his PM talk was strange (not wrong) and because weekend was coming up. And I don't like how Leo says "IMO he wasn't a bad lynch either" about drealmer. Because it was a bad lynch. Bad for town. And a good lynch for scum only.
avatar
dedoporno: If any of this is part of an elaborate ruse I'm fine with losing to such a masterful play.
I'm handsome not smart.
Everyone has checked in now, here is my reread of flubb:

Post #153 flubb votes for drealmer and remains there. Could be scum but hard to blame anyone for being on drealmer’s wagon.

….drealmer lynched…..

Post #262 – Votes for Hunter on D2, which would mean he visited Dessimu on N1. (I see no indication of any N0 actions.)

Post #365 – He will vote for Lift or Hunter, not Dessimu (also makes couple of posts to Dessimu and later says he thinks Dessimu is town)

……Lift lynched….

Today’s reveal would indicate he visited Hunter last night.


There are three possibilities:
1. flubb is town
2. flubb is scum (part of a team)
3. flubb is a third party

1. flubb is town - We have 3 confirmed town and a pool of 6 to find the remaining scum, probably 2-3. Flubb’s posts appear consistent, no obvious red flags

2. flubb is scum - There are a few possibilities:
A. Both Dessimu and Hunter are scum – that is one ballsy move and puts all their eggs in one basket

B. One of Dessimu/Hunter are scum – Less risky than A (this is assuming a 3 person scum team, if 2 person team, it is essentially the same as A.)

C. Both Dessimu and Hunter are town – flubb’s buddies (1-2) are in the other list

3. Flubb is third party - one hell of a ballsy play, not impossible but not likely, seems too improbable

If flubb is scum, he takes a big risk on there being a cop in the game. This might be mitigated a bit if scum has a role-cop and discovered a role that made a cop unlikely. flubb was the town arsonist after all, so I wouldn’t put it past him. But it’s still a big risk. If any shenanigans are going on here, I’d go for 2B or 2C. Gain the trust of 1-2 town and use them to help take out the remaining town.

There’s a possibility he’s scamming us, but it's a big gamble. I think he is telling the truth.


avatar
dedoporno: If any of this is part of an elaborate ruse I'm fine with losing to such a masterful play.
This.

avatar
dedoporno: If any of this is part of an elaborate ruse I'm fine with losing to such a masterful play.
avatar
flubbucket: I'm handsome not smart.
Said the spider to the fly. ;-)
Continuing stuff about Leonard.


Just strange things on their own:

avatar
Dessimu: Leonard didn't see this issue as well. Might he be scum?
avatar
Leonard03: Yes.
Leo later answered to trentonlf "Just to be clear - I am not scum". But maybe this answer was because this innocent "Yes" attracted unwanted attention? Add to that:
avatar
Hunter65536: I do have my doubts about Leonard07.
avatar
Leonard03: Never met him, but I heard he's a slippery fellow.
avatar
Hunter65536: Hehe my mistake, I meant you, Leonard03.
avatar
Leonard03: I heard he's a slippery fellow too. :D
Proud of being slippery. Why slippery?
avatar
Leonard03: Since I don't have anything to defend against "pressure" isn't going to do anything >_>
Sounds like a challenge
avatar
Leonard03: @Dessimu - You gave trouble to HSL for not making any real votes, what about CSPVG? He's only had one, which was RVS on Krypsyn.
Why interested in CSPVG?

And Leo seems to "accidentally not pay attention to things". Admitting them when pointed out:
avatar
Leonard03: Huh. You did indeed. My bad.
avatar
Leonard03: That would explain why I thought I had said something about it. As for my reason I noted at the very end of post 133 (yes it was a weak reason). I'm not sure why I didn't reply to you.
(speaking of "reason" for voting Leo voting flub, it was "flubbucket talks too much" (D1))



How Leo voted Lifthrasil (at the time of his vote, Leo took 4th place on Lifthrasil's wagon (some of you seem to draw opinion of place on wagon)):
avatar
Lifthrasil: - you vote-jumped, giving only some sappy one-liners as reason
- you settled on drealmer on a contrieved reason
- your association of an 'all-men' game looks strange too.
avatar
Leonard03: Good points here. I find the last one the most noteworthy.
avatar
Leonard03: Interesting. It seems Hunter was not the first to talk about the possibilities of guys in the school. From looking at post 155 it seems the idea comes to him out of the blue. This is what I found suspicious.
However, later on HSL comments on it. And Hunter explains it was from a different post of drealmer's (of which there are many :P
Searching back post 113 fits the bill.
Everybody else probably knew this already, so hey, time for me to get with the times!
After some of us pointed out that Lift's third reason on voting Hunter is wrong, Leo "re-discovered" same thing. Which, if thinking Leo to be scum, looks more like blending in with the crowd.
avatar
Leonard03: Even though I just pointed out one of those reasons was wrong? This seems a little (as in, a lot) like jumping from one wagon that stalled to try and start another. And did nothing ever come of
Vote: Lifthrasil
Together with the re-discovered truth, Leo makes another scum-fact about Lift.

avatar
Leonard03: The claim itself doesn't really influence me in any direction, it would only matter if he claimed something besides town vanilla.
However the post itself does sound like town Lifthrasil... from what I remember.
Note: "sounds like town Lifthrasil". Yet:
avatar
Leonard03: So out of the three (Lifthrasil, Hunter, and Dessimu) I still think I'm most suspicious of Lift. No matter who we lynch though, the flip should be at least semi-helpful.

@bler You unvoted to avoid a quick hammer, I believe. Lift has claimed now, so where's that vote going?
Yet "no matter who we lynch". It bloody matters! We are hunting scum here, not just lynching for fun. Though Leo might be right in saying "no matter who we lynch", "who" being "Lifthrasil, Hunter, and Dessimu" since we are all town and Leo, as scum, would know that!

Also, why pushing bler to make a decision? Seems to me Leo is again, eager to make a lynch.



To sum up... Through the game, Leonard voted:
> flubbucket, because:
- deadline was approaching
- flub talks too much this game
> drealmer (hammered), because:
- deadline was approaching (even though there were about 12 hours till deadline)
- to avoid no-lynch
- because of strange PM talk
> Lifthrasil, because:
- of re-discovered thing about third reason in Lifthrasil's vote being wrong
- deadline approaching

And Leo made wrong and strange points, that:
- drealmer was a not bad lynch
- we can lynch anyone as long as it is not a no-lynch

Also, Leo made his point through the game that he could easily change his vote on any other wagon (which were made on flub, me, Hunter). Without providing reasons, why any of us look like mafia scum.


I think Leo is scum. Mafia trio would be cristigale, CSPVG and Leonard. It this case it is strange that Leo poked CSPVG twice (indirectly). But then, Leo never actually accused CSPVG of anything.
I am traveling today. If all goes as planned, I will check in tonight. If not, I'll be out until tomorrow afternoon.
avatar
cristigale: I am traveling today. If all goes as planned, I will check in tonight. If not, I'll be out until tomorrow afternoon.
Have a safe trip!