Good that it's fixed again. You can leave your message where it is, since it actually doesn't reveal anything and contains no claim and no statement about any alignment.

Correct.

The "spirit" of the rule is to not allow an advantage that exists outside of game mechanics. Whether that is the case here is up to the moderator(s) to decide.

L.
M.
A.
O.

And look at that - you get to live Today. Lucky, lucky you. I'll see you in my room tonight. You bring the Tommy Gun, I'll bring the offal.

Thanks for the clarification on the second point, as that is a question I had asked you.

On the first point, I have a lot of crazy theories that don't pan out, but I am <sometimes> right. My take was that a) Leonard wasn't going anywhere and that b) we weren't likely to get anything out of pressuring him. Even earlier in the day pre-wagon he was mostly dodging/deflecting rather than really coming into the light.

Adalia, OTOH, usually wants to talk and is squirmier, which cuts both ways.

He was more likely to try and talk his way out of pressure (the pre-mature "coroner" claim last game), which, even if he didn't talk his hole deeper, and we ended up voting elsewhere weighing his defense, would have given us something to hold him to later.

Putting that off til tomorrow gives him more time, and potentially also more info to formulate a better defense/claim. Speaking broadly, Leonard, perhaps like 1-2 other players, is generally best tackled by other means, imo. /shrug


It may end with a good result, but there's no getting around the fact it's a terrible wagon.

My point was more that, at L-6 you had the time to stop and consider making a valid argument for voting Leonard when you voted, or suggest an alternative strategy. Instead you just piled on with little comment.

So yes, that looks like a vote of not much more than "better him but me."

On the yogs point, I do agree. He's asking for quite a bit of trust without actually sharing anything, and there is the open question of why he thinks we should trust that flip (which fits his agenda) but not any others. Bit of a rabbit hole opens up there.

Clarification: Each Scum team won't bus "each other", meaning their own buddies. The two teams still have to eliminate the other team to win.

Abort, Retry, Fail?

Ignore.

Ok, that would make more sense. I thought you were suggesting scum would not vote another player they thought was scum (even if on an opposing team)

Quite.

You're welcome, I had no intention of leaving it unanswered, just decided to do it in my reply to Leonard03, after seeing how he defended himself.

You say your take "was", do you still think we got nth?


That's why I didn't want to let go.


Frankly, there's so much going on, I'm getting a headache.

Let's look at the technicalities of how the game has gone:

Day 1: Nothing unusual, but lynch flips Scum.

Night 1: One kill, no flip

Day 2: Reported actions - two block/jailings

And that's it.

There is essentially zero evidence to support the theory of two Scum teams.

You lost me.

Do I get to be an ass and heh you?

lol

I was going to say I finally understand him.


Good question. Off the cuff, we got confirmation that, whatever he's doing, he's not even really trying to hunt. Which seems odd. It appears he was not sitting on some grand theory and just afraid to tip his hand.

Otherwise I'd say he's pretty much doubled-down. Still fits with scum whatever, still fits with neutral whatever, still maybe fits with town power role he doesn't know how to conceal/claim.

Confused vanilla does look less likely, as he should still have some sort of hunch/theory/ping, and he'd seemingly have nothing to lose in sharing it.

Gotta run!

Yeah. I was waiting to post this:

EBWOP

Never mind. I think I see what you are getting at. I agree.