Thanks for the clarification on the second point, as that is a question I had asked you.

On the first point, I have a lot of crazy theories that don't pan out, but I am <sometimes> right. My take was that a) Leonard wasn't going anywhere and that b) we weren't likely to get anything out of pressuring him. Even earlier in the day pre-wagon he was mostly dodging/deflecting rather than really coming into the light.

Adalia, OTOH, usually wants to talk and is squirmier, which cuts both ways.

He was more likely to try and talk his way out of pressure (the pre-mature "coroner" claim last game), which, even if he didn't talk his hole deeper, and we ended up voting elsewhere weighing his defense, would have given us something to hold him to later.

Putting that off til tomorrow gives him more time, and potentially also more info to formulate a better defense/claim. Speaking broadly, Leonard, perhaps like 1-2 other players, is generally best tackled by other means, imo. /shrug


It may end with a good result, but there's no getting around the fact it's a terrible wagon.

My point was more that, at L-6 you had the time to stop and consider making a valid argument for voting Leonard when you voted, or suggest an alternative strategy. Instead you just piled on with little comment.

So yes, that looks like a vote of not much more than "better him but me."

On the yogs point, I do agree. He's asking for quite a bit of trust without actually sharing anything, and there is the open question of why he thinks we should trust that flip (which fits his agenda) but not any others. Bit of a rabbit hole opens up there.