It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Hmmm... perhaps we should all vote you then?
And this makes sense because...?

avatar
JMich: should he make it to the night.
And through the night for that matter.

avatar
JMich: Where did the "role cop" come from? I thought yog claimed town cop, not town role cop.
Don't scum role cops already know who's not scum? A neutral can make this backfire, but the odds of claiming a neutral is townie or anti-town are low.
avatar
agentcarr16: Well, the laptop is a write-off, so I'll be posting from the phone for a while.

...............
avatar
flubbucket: I have posted from my phone before. To vote I hit the "bold" button first and then typed the name (or whatever) in between the bold tags.

It should work maybe??
Yeah, it's usable. Of course, the phone developers didn't design the keyboards with programmers (or Forum Mafia) in mind. I do have another computer, a desktop, but there's no way to get at it while I'm at school for eight hours a day.

I'll manage...
avatar
dedoporno: stuff
+1 for the helpful advice. (and +1 for your previous help, and for LIft's also).

With that said, I... think we're talking about different things. When cristi said that it could be a clever play, I ASSUMED s/he was talking about mchack's speculation on a possible connection between Yog, agent and myself. I don't see how that could be clever if mchack is scum. When Yog and you both chided him for his post, I assumed you were doing so for him spelling out a connection that might not have been thought of by others.

Yet here you seem to talking about him indirectly implying that he's town, which he's done before. Unless I'm totally missing what you're saying here AND what you were talking about before when you told him "not cool".

avatar
mchack: since you now think that wasn't it. I'm quite intrigued to know what "it" was, exactly? I don't get the reference at all and only think of a card game joker that can essentially be any card it wants to. Is there such a thing in mafia?
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Jester

"A Jester is a role that wins when they are lynched."

I believe jesters are also called jokers. Some people are alleging that Yog is a jester, that he claimed cop to draw suspicion, and did so, along with his later odd postings, in the hopes of getting lynched so he can win.

So that's what K thought Yog was, but I'd like to know what he now thinks Yog is. I assume though he's not going to say.

avatar
agentcarr16: Wow, nice catch. I think I only saw the capitalization because of the earlier comment on not capitalizing Hyper's name.
I mean, if you REALLY want to get nitpicky, he called me bluemoon instead of bluemooner, or BlueMooner. But that just seems... nitpicky. Unlike other people, I really don't care what people call me.


avatar
dedoporno: The main issue isn't that you said you're Town, but the role claimed. When I said it wasn't cool I meant that your Town Vanilla claim (if real) basically told scum that you aren't a decent NK pick. They're primarily gunning for power roles that can expose them or tamper with their schemes. One of the stronger abilities of the Town Vanilla (if not the strongest) is to take the NK thus potentially saving a power role for one more night. Giving this away negates the benefit.
Okay... I think I understand your point now, but don't really agree with it. I mean, not only is everybody going to call themselves town even when not everybody is, I would think everybody would call themselves vanilla also, since that's the default role. If we say that mchack is naive and made a rookie mistake in HONESTLY letting slip he's vanilia, then that might be a valid assertion, but since we're all going to CLAIM to be vanilla isn't it kind of.... wrong(?) to chide him for that, since he could well be anything else? He could be mafia, or a town role, or a neutral, or something else... right?

Or am I still misunderstanding? Is it that it's okay for everyone to claim town, but not to claim vanilla, since that is a form of role-claiming, and ALL role-claiming is something to be avoided (unless you know what you're doing)?
avatar
BlueMooner: I believe jesters are also called jokers.
Joker != Jester

avatar
BlueMooner: So that's what K thought Yog was, but I'd like to know what he now thinks Yog is.
My opinion of yogsloth's role is the same as it was when I first saw his role declaration. Hint: It isn't Jester.
EBWOP (edit by way of post)

Well, what I should have said is that, in the game of Mafia, Jester does not equal Joker. I was not using them interchangeably. (However, in the English language, they are considered synonyms.)

I hope this avoids any confusion as to my intent.

Now to wait for post timer.... bleh.
avatar
BlueMooner: Or am I still misunderstanding? Is it that it's okay for everyone to claim town, but not to claim vanilla, since that is a form of role-claiming, and ALL role-claiming is something to be avoided (unless you know what you're doing)?
I’ll give it I go...

Mchack mentioned that he would do what he could to help town with his vote because he didn’t have any night actions . Admitting that he didn’t have any night action was the newbie mistake. By stating that he has no night actions, the assumption is that he is Vanilla. As JMich pointed out, there are some roles that may have a presence during the night even if they do not get to choose an action at night. But given that mchack is new and the context of the post, Vanilla is fairly safe bet.

Also remember the importance of town not lying. If a player is town, they should (typically) not claim a false role. So if someone claims Vanilla and you believe they are town it is reasonably safe to assume they are telling the truth about the role. In fact, you should be safe in assuming that any Town player is telling the truth about their role. (If they really are Town.) So Town will not claim Vanilla if they are some other role.

Scum also know that Town is expected to tell the truth. So when someone who isn’t part of their scum team claims Vanilla, there is only one of two possibilities:
1. That player really is Town vanilla
2. The player is a third party or from a separate scum team and is claiming to be vanilla.

If scum believe that player is Town (and they actually are), that information gives scum a better edge than they had before. For simplicity sake, let’s say there are 10 players in a game, 3 are scum the rest are town. Let’s also assume that town has 3 power roles among its 7 players. Scum is most interested in eliminating the power roles. Originally, they have a 3 in 7 chance of picking a player to NK who has a power role. When a town claims Vanilla, it immediately eliminates one the players from the group of likely NK candidates, and scum now have a 3 in 6 chance of hitting a power role. If a second player claims Vanilla, the chances of hitting a power role are now 3 in 5. Much better odds for scum than before. In our game, I assume the town pool is larger, but every town Vanilla claim still helps scum zero in on who holds the town power roles.

Everyone will claim to be town, but knowing when to claim your role (Vanilla, Cop, Doctor, etc.) is trickier. Claiming Vanilla early is not good for town (as explained above).

Hope that helps.
avatar
Lifthrasil: but then again which Day 1 is good for town? Of the two claims, mchack's has the feel of a genuine rookie mistake. It might be good acting and good scum play, but for now I am inclined to give him the benefit of doubt.
*ahem* Space Opera *ahem*

avatar
yogsloth: I have this dream that somebody, somewhere is paying attention.
What? Who? Where? Huh?

As for mchack's rookie mistake: I don't think it's a rookie mistake. But I don't think he's scum either. I actually think I know what he's hinting at. And I really hope I am right about this one. That would be one professional play, especially for a rookie. Hopefully I am right. Hopefully.

avatar
yogsloth: Boobs? Was it boobs? It was boobs, wasn't it?
I plead the fifth.
avatar
adaliabooks: And there is the fact that last time yog's was a cop he claimed day 1... admittedly then he actually had a useful read to share, something which he seems to be lacking this time, so maybe he just feels claiming cop day 1 is a really really good thing to do?
He did say something that can be taken as something learned from his role. But I could be taken it wrong.


avatar
yogsloth: Here's who you are: some washed-up has-been landed on this island out desperation. You've got more flaws than a pawn shop wedding ring. You're broken and don't work right anymore.
Yogs - Is this a reference to yourself or to someone else?
avatar
adaliabooks: suggests scum might chat during the day then I'll leave it where it is.
Scum might chat during the day. It happened before.

avatar
flubbucket: I have posted from my phone before. To vote I hit the "bold" button first and then typed the name (or whatever) in between the bold tags.
I think it's easier to just write the bold tags, but not entirely sure. Posted from the phone only once.
Tuesday night vote count:

3 Yogsloth (Trentonlf, Lifthrasil, Flubbucket)
2 CSPVG (Yogsloth, Adaliabooks)
1 Agentcarr16 (HijacK)
1 HijacK (CSPVG)
1 GoG Support (BlueMooner)
1 Adaliabooks (Krypsyn)

With 16 players alive it takes 9 votes to kick someone off the island and 8 votes to "no-lynch".
Yogsloth is closest to leaving at L-6.

Not voting: JMich, HypersomniacLive, Dedoporno, McHack, AgentCarr16, Cristigale and Sage103082

Deadline is in 5 days on Monday Sept 14th at Midnight EDT (UTC -4)
[Extended due to Holidays, Vacations, 16 players and its the first day]

Of course you can always vote someone off before that
[Hint hint, your observers are getting bored. Maybe someone with Edit a post?]

Not making an appearance today: CSPVG (but has made a number of posts during the "free weekend")

Bagatha Chrustie reporting in again.
So we have lots of role talk tonight.
Who screwed up and what all this means.
Let me tell you about my first role,
I was in elementary school,
They were clearly blind to my budding talent,
Teacher cast me as a tree...
Ok, maybe they weren't as blind as I thought to my "budding" talent...
Post edited September 09, 2015 by RWarehall
avatar
BlueMooner: +1 for the helpful advice. (and +1 for your previous help, and for LIft's also).
I'm tempted to give a RWare like speech of how you're trying to sympathize with players.

avatar
BlueMooner: s/he
She
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Let me guess, the reply you got was:

Please try clearing your browser's cache, performing a clean refresh (Ctrl+R) of the page, and then logging out, and back in. If you're using intrusive plugins, like JavaScript and ad blockers, please try disabling these, to see if they were causing the problem If this doesn't help, please try using a different browser altogether and let me know if that helped.
avatar
HypersomniacLive:
Haxxor! You have hacked my email and read my private diary! You've seen my private pictures! I feel violated! I... I... I did not have relations with that llama! Or the horse (well, just the once).

Yes, that's essentially what they sent me.

avatar
yogsloth: You should all be like adalia and randomly vote for the same guy I'm voting for.
Why? How does that help town? Wouldn't NOT lynching be best for town?

Earlier I asked how many mafia there might be. Somebody said usually 2-3, prolly 3-5 for this game. So let's take the average, 4. That also makes the math easier. With 16 players and 4 mafia, that means that killing random person gives a 75% chance of killing town. That seems BAD. Especially when we could wind up lynching a power town.

When mafia kill somebody tonight they'll absolutely kill a townie, but they have no more idea of roles than anybody else. By lynching somebody, isn't that sorta like giving mafia TWO bullets to kill, since we'll almost certainly wind up with two townies dead, two chances for town powers to die? Sure, there's a 25% chance we'll get lucky and hit mafia, but shouldn't we wait until odds are in better favor?

Or does the whole lynching thing operate on a sort of "can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs" principle? Are we willing to kill a bunch of townies for the off chance of hitting mafia? Does this mean that lynching is actually town's greatest tool, and that power roles are merely a small second? I had been thinking of voting nolynch.

avatar
RWarehall: 1 GoG Support (BlueMooner)
Awesome, thank you! I was really hoping you'd include it.! : D

avatar
yogsloth: To be honest, I'm a lot more worried about your life than mine.
Booo!

avatar
HijacK: He probably had enough of me last game, but I doubt I was the only one not mentioned. I'd be sad if that was the case. Like for real? I noticed my name was missing, but I did not notice the rest of 14 players besides me and him were named there.
What do you mean you "doubt"? You mean you didn't check? Are you just skimming over people's posts, even when they concern you?

You say you noticed your name was missing but didn't say anything? Really?? That's not relevant? What else aren't you saying?

avatar
agentcarr16: I'm not sure if I want to see where yogsloth goes with this "jellybeans up his nose" thing.

I agree that CSPVG has been quiet, but he is normally a lurker. So I won't vote for him until more pressing circumstances.
Well, it'll be a lot easier to win the "guess how many jellybeans" contest than when they put them in a jar.

And I agree that CS seems to be really quiet. I know some of you guys have RL issues that interfere with your posting, what with adalia and her concert, you and your laptop, Hyper and his back, and so forth, but CS has been posting far too little IMO. Didn't the GM say that we had to post every day unless good reason? So I'm gonna

Pressure CSPVG

Post a lot more and contribute to this conversation or feel the pain of my 1/16th vote!

avatar
Krypsyn: Joker != Jester
Oh.

avatar
cristigale: I’ll give it I go...
Thanks and +1.

avatar
HijacK: I'm tempted to give a RWare like speech of how you're trying to sympathize with players.
Positive, helpful behaviour should be recognized and encouraged. Simply +1ing somebody is pointless if you don't mention it. And I've been doing it for some time, it has nothing to do with Mafia.

http://www.gog.com/forum/fallout_series/a_couple_issues/post13
http://www.gog.com/forum/general/quest_for_infamy_glitch/post7

She
Thanks.
avatar
RWarehall: [Hint hint, your observers are getting bored. Maybe someone with Edit a post?]
You know what's more boring than sticking jellybeans up your nose? Watching someone else stick jellybeans up their nose, and then watching people discuss it. SO...
...
...
boredom is looming, and threatens the land. One man, fearing for all that is, decides to take matters into his own hands...
...
...
Stand back while I whip this out people. I'm going to use my giant tool here and Stir The Pot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBNwH4ASvLk&t=3m4s
3:04-3:16

CPVSG - I Choose You!

You have been too silent! Stop being a wallflower or be pressed between pages for all time!

Hyper - I Choose You!

All of your posts have been idle comments: "really?" "interesting" "how odd...". Your gossamer posts need more meat on them! Write a few paragraphs of your OWN thoughts to add to our conversation.

Hijack - I Choose You!

You saw a post of Yog that mentioned everybody except you, and didn't say anything? I pointed it out, and you didn't feel people talking about you was worth looking into?? What are you hiding? Answer the Grand High Inquisitor or face... the comfy chair!!!!1111
Warning: the forum ate my post so hopefully this won't double post

avatar
BlueMooner: Why? How does that help town? Wouldn't NOT lynching be best for town?
Aaaand we have the first person suggesting No-Lynch. And on day 1. The amount of slack I'm willing to cut you for being new to the game is decreasing rather fast.

avatar
BlueMooner: What do you mean you "doubt"?
Exactly what you read.

avatar
BlueMooner: You mean you didn't check? Are you just skimming over people's posts, even when they concern you?
I didn't check at the time of the post. I checked afterwards. As for you suggesting I'm skimming over the thread, how about you look on how many people I corrected on various things. Maybe that will get your head straight.

avatar
BlueMooner: You say you noticed your name was missing but didn't say anything? Really?? That's not relevant?
Since I didn't care much and assumed not everyone else was mentioned, I didn't see why I should. It wouldn't be the first time someone misses a name, whether intentional or not and the relevance isn't there.

avatar
BlueMooner: What else aren't you saying?
A lot. Care to know what?


avatar
BlueMooner: her
avatar
BlueMooner: Positive, helpful behaviour should be recognized and encouraged. Simply +1ing somebody is pointless if you don't mention it. And I've been doing it for some time, it has nothing to do with Mafia.
Not solid enough to mention it every time. Looks like you're trying to be all friendly with everyone.
avatar
BlueMooner: You saw a post of Yog that mentioned everybody except you, and didn't say anything?
As I said, I did not mention everybody else was named. You're either trying to put words into my mouth, or you're just skimming the thread and not reading carefully.

avatar
BlueMooner: I pointed it out, and you didn't feel people talking about you was worth looking into??
No. I did not feel that. Got a problem with that?

avatar
BlueMooner: What are you hiding? Answer the Grand High Inquisitor or face... the comfy chair!!!!1111
I'm not sure if you're playing dumb or what, but you must realize not everybody can share everything they know, otherwise scum get easy targets.

Which brings me to my next point. This insistent info fishing sounds more like role fishing to me, on the very day 1. Not only that, you also argued for a no-lynch, and attempted to frame me for skimming or foul play when I clearly explained I didn't pay much attention to the number of people in the list. Given that is so high, I assumed there would be a lot more names.

Unvote agent

Vote BlueMooner