It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
adaliabooks: Don't worry, these things happen. You played really well, particularly considering the circumstances. I know you may not feel like it right now (and I hope things pick up on the job front) but you should definitely play again when you have the chance :)
avatar
BlueMooner: Thanks. I don't feel like it right now, just depressed in general. I don't know if I want to play again, as day 1 dragged on far too long for me, and the metagaming I think ruins the fun. I also feel bad about leaving everybody, and you, hanging, and don't want to do that again.
I was not confused, I had no idea about the restrictions since I was not restricted. Plus anyone who claims day one is scummy IMO and I don't see that opinion changing anytime soon.
avatar
BlueMooner: I was irritated at players who didn't post much day 1, and at C for getting lynched for lurking of all things, and then I go and disappear, so I'm irritated at myself.

I had plans I wanted to explore, see what possibilities there were, but that didn't happen. The two mafia deaths in two days, followed by an almost certain third, was really disheartening to me. Then there was all the talk of mass claim which I still think is a very bad idea, and then the job loss.
Couple things - CSP was lynched as much for his play/roles in PRIOR games as for his play in this one. There was a note in the scum thread that said "Why him and not Sage/Cristi?" which echoed something I said in the observer thread. Poop happens.

That said, even getting behind doesn't necessarily mean a loss. Game 28 scum was a team of 3 and lost one N1, and another D3 and still won. You don't necessarily know what other forces or out there or how town might fall apart until the end. It would have been hard for a new player to win in that scenario, but it wasn't set in stone yet. Though Adalia making 2 notable slips back-to-back late in D2 didn't help things. ;)

As for the game itself, people lurk for different reasons. Hijack has his reasons, while other people just play that way out of habit or have RL stuff come up.

Likewise, despite the fact that the loudest voices might tell you otherwise, there's not really broad agreement on 'how to play.' In any given game mass claim might be a good idea, or it might be a terrible idea. Lynching all lurkers might be great, or it might be bad. And even the same people may view it differently across different games - that may be a tell as to something they're hiding, or it may really just be a change in philosophy or tactical reality.

In the end all you can do is play and keep fighting through it and sorting out your own views and playstyle.

Or, you know, sit out in the observer thread and criticize everyone else's views and playstyle ;)
I just thought I needed to capture (and then spoil) this moment:
Attachments:
1337.jpg (36 Kb)
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Don't despair so easily,
I've had an unhappy life, so I do tend to despair easily.

avatar
adaliabooks: I'm sure I speak for everyone when I say you would always be welcome if you changed your mind :)
Thanks, I appreciate that.

avatar
bler144: That said, even getting behind doesn't necessarily mean a loss. Game 28 scum was a team of 3 and lost one N1, and another D3 and still won. You don't necessarily know what other forces or out there or how town might fall apart until the end. It would have been hard for a new player to win in that scenario, but it wasn't set in stone yet. Though Adalia making 2 notable slips back-to-back late in D2 didn't help things. ;)
From my perspective town was killing with 100% accuracy. Two mafia kills in two days, and I was sure Adalia was going down day 3. This was my first game, and I was at a loss to figure out how town was doing that, or if that was even atypical. For all I knew, this was how most games went, I had nothing to compare it to. I certainly didn't know how to counter it, so who's to say I wouldn't go down day 4.

If three vets could be killed all in a row, I didn't think I had a chance all on my lonesome, with no clue what I was doing. Also, the fact that I would be killing alone meant I would never use my power again, which I'm sure town would realize meant mafia was down to one person. And, as I said, I didn't want people to NOT vote for me out of any kind of sympathy or newbie-kindness. I certainly wouldn't want to win that way.
I regard the ending of this game as largely borked, and it didn't need to be.

If two things had happened that were easily in Scum's control, the game would have continued on for quite some time.

1) adalia had played it straight and hadn't Scum claimed. I thought he was obvi-Scum to the hilt at the end of Day 2, but Town didn't agree, and nobody wanted to lynch him Day 3. Had he played it straight after trent's lynch, he could have just kept on going in Day 4. I guess dedo can tell us whether he would have vig'd him anyway, but without that Scum claim, you never know.

2) BlueMooner had simply kept playing. He really wasn't on anybody's Scumdar and was doing just fine. If he hadn't just abandoned the game without a word, he could have kept it going for quite some time... both extending the game and gaining valuable experience.

Instead, both remaining Scum just laid down and died.
@BlueMooner - I want you to know that I did appreciate what you contributed and I think you could do really well if you played more.
I can totally understand that Day 1 drags on, and I really don't like it much. I'd almost be inclined to shorten Day 1 when I'm modding, but that's just me.
So you know, you'll be welcomed back if you decide to return.
avatar
yogsloth: 1) adalia had played it straight and hadn't Scum claimed. I thought he was obvi-Scum to the hilt at the end of Day 2, but Town didn't agree, and nobody wanted to lynch him Day 3. Had he played it straight after trent's lynch, he could have just kept on going in Day 4. I guess dedo can tell us whether he would have vig'd him anyway, but without that Scum claim, you never know.
You did read trents claim? There was no way I was surviving the next day... even if they didn't just lynch me on principle I would have cracked under the pressure, as I'm not good with pressure...
Yeah, I didn't see him surviving Trent's reveal either. But up til that point it was definitely an open question of how town would go.

That said, it was the dual-slips on D2 that got both Trent and Yogs to visit Adalia. ;)

But again, going back to game 28, we lynched RW on Day 3, leaving just Yogs, and Yogs was the CLEEEAAR prime suspect as the last scum, and yet town all got together and shot ourselves in the foot.

Just because 1-2 players know something doesn't mean that "town knows" or agrees. Read the observer thread from this past game and watch Yogs freaking out because he thinks he didn't sell the "Lynch Adalia next!" solution hard enough. And to an extent he was right. Other than HSL and Trent (who had his own FoS), no one was really pushing Adalia that hard. Without Trent's reveal, Adalia perhaps does blend back in the crowd come D4.

Oddly, the most audacious little lie Yogs told game #28, and somehow no one ever questioned him on, wasn't that he claimed commuter - it's WHY he claimed to have used it N1. He said "things were so crazy!" which was total BS - town had no idea things were crazy until dawn of D2. So even as scum you can make a major slip, and there can be enough other things going on that it can be survived anyway with a bit of distraction.
avatar
bler144: [snip]
no time for reading old games :) new sign up thread. We need you bler144 :)
avatar
RWarehall: ...
You playing in the new one :)
avatar
mchack: We need you bler144 :)
On that note at some point in game 29 when we were getting destroyed Yogs jokingly PMed me:

"Help us Blerbi Wan, you're our only hope"
avatar
HypersomniacLive: ).
Make sure to get in the next game! http://www.gog.com/forum/general/forum_mafia_31_sign_up_welcome_to_space_station_epsilon
avatar
BlueMooner: I've had an unhappy life, so I do tend to despair easily.

[...]
I'm sorry to hear that, but this is just a game, no reason to get all that serious about it. Look at it as a chance or exercise to act against what comes naturally to you, and who knows, perhaps some of that experience might eventually spill over to other aspects of your life.

You showed great potential, and should think of joining us again whenever time and state of mind allows it.



avatar
bler144: Couple things - CSP was lynched as much for his play/roles in PRIOR games as for his play in this one. [...]

[...]
I at least did not vote CSPVG for his lurking, that's kind of his trademark. But that post he made before he claimed and after his previous half-baked ones was a poor defence of himself, and a very poor attempt at dodging why he didn't get what was going on, it just didn't feel honest.


avatar
bler144: [...]

Or, you know, sit out in the observer thread and criticize everyone else's views and playstyle ;)
Cheers, will do when you play. ;-)
avatar
BlueMooner: snip
To be honest, you played great while you were here. In terms of blending in, it could be argued that you outplayed three veterans. I do think you had a chance to win if you were active. It wasn't going to be easy, but you did have a chance, But missing an entire "5 day" day, certainly didn't help your chances.
avatar
agentcarr16: <snip>
Testing, testing.

EDIT: Excellent. I can actually make my replies look like my forum thread avatar. I was wondering if GOG would let me put my avatar back.
Post edited October 12, 2015 by agentcarr16