Cyraxpt: I'm confused, you misquoted me right? Otherwise i'll have to ask you to be more explicit because i have no idea of what you're talking about.
Yes, sorry! and corrected :P
Cyraxpt: ToxicTom post? I'm in favor of a paywall, people don't like restrictions but you can't expect order when there's people that abuse the freedom that was given but i'm guessing you want me to discuss his suggestion.
Well, first problem is that people that have been abusing that system already have a bunch of accounts to do so therefore the restriction for new accounts wouldn't work, second, the rep system is dumb, people can't voice their opinion otherwise they're downvoted, what's the point of having "freedom"? Besides, people are more bound to upvote their forum "sweethearts" than everyone equally (not counting giveaways, obviously) so what's the point?
About the names of who downvoted, that wouldn't go well with everyone because "mah privacy/freedom" not to say that you would see a bunch of accounts that you never heard of.
Just remove the rep system, if you're against something that was then VOICE about it instead of being a lazy coward hidding behind a - symbol.
Paywall is more than likely out of discussion, too much real technical stuff in the way. If you never had in place before, kind of no way to do it afterwards.
Getting rid or rep altogether? (Not talking about GA or similar( BUT as mm324 put it so nicely in post82, how about showing appreciation for people doing work for us?
Privacy? It is the user who decided to push the button, or? If he doesn't want to see his name, don't use downvote. So you are a bit contradicting yourself about (unless I miss something): freedom.
hm, just thought about the upvoting: maybe making the same? making names public?
Just brainstorming ;)