Posted December 29, 2020
Alright kids, today's lesson is recognizing the "Appeal to worse problems" fallacy.
It is basically pulling the argument that expressing concern about a (relatively) small problem means that the person doesn't care about any larger problems. You can see it often as "How dare you campaign for X when there are children starving in Africa?"
Like can be seen in this example:
1- I can multitask;
2- I may or may not be a supporter of him in government, and which one is the truth is not your damn business.
I also must therefore deduce there currently are absolutely NO ISSUES in Chile and that your country is Paradise on Earth, because you can be here worrying about whether I worry about Gog, Devotion or Bolsonaro, while I supposedly can only worry about my country.
Next please?
It is basically pulling the argument that expressing concern about a (relatively) small problem means that the person doesn't care about any larger problems. You can see it often as "How dare you campaign for X when there are children starving in Africa?"
Like can be seen in this example:
Unfortunately for your poorly thought out argument:
1- I can multitask;
2- I may or may not be a supporter of him in government, and which one is the truth is not your damn business.
I also must therefore deduce there currently are absolutely NO ISSUES in Chile and that your country is Paradise on Earth, because you can be here worrying about whether I worry about Gog, Devotion or Bolsonaro, while I supposedly can only worry about my country.
Next please?
Post edited December 29, 2020 by joppo