I have never said it invalidates something but it does make it sound like something you say to look good rather than being genuine about it, an exception here and there is fine but it does worry me maybe i'm a bit paranoid but we both know EA, Activision, 2K and Bethesda didn't start out as horrible as they are now and i need to make this fully clear that CDP are nowhere near these monstrosities and will hopefully never be it's just an example of how the future can turn out.

Yes but then the store would lose relevance, why would anyone come here for drm'ed games unless it's a future exclusive. I would be surprised if GOG still was fine if they stopped caring about drm but a interesting thought.

It's fine. I thought it was clear that no one thought this was like the END of the World serious but maybe i could have communicated my intentions better.

Go down what road? You make no fucking sense. And what "both ways"? And Gwent doesnt have DRM.

I have already said what i meant, i would prefer if CDP stay away from Gwents business model in the future and as i said you shouldn't claim to stand for drm free and good practices if you make games like Gwent an online game that is what i meant by both ways.
It's actually really fucking simple either you care for drm free or you do not. GOG was supposed to be DRM FREE once without all connection and online requirement bullshit but they decided to make Gwent which was once against their principles.

In the end it's CDP's store and they make the rules, i'm happy as long as they offer drm free and offline installers and i hupe they don't move closer to gwents business model.

This can also mean that you lied earlier and you do not have access to such tools. Because you said ...

Why delay an answer that takes " a matter of minutes" for so long? On the other hand, if you do possess access to such tools, why don't you take that "a few minutes" to help the community instead of wasting everyone's time and energy?

In summary, why criticize someone for something you were not capable of doing yourself for 2 days even tho you said it takes minutes? Why not chose to contribute to the community instead of doing unnecessary criticism?

I am eagerly waiting for your response.

How are you gonna make a multiplayer game offline? Youre a troll...

No i'm not, you don't have to make a multiplayer game it's simply as easy as that but they willingly choose to make one that's only online in a store that supposedly drm free. Yes i know the game is F2P and yes i know it's not a big deal..yet.

It's not a difficult concept to understand why some people don't shower praise over CDP when they make a game like Gwent with MTX and always online components while they have been slowly throwing away principles one by one over the years.

How old are you? If you know nothing about the period before internet became mainstream, at least don't be an ignorant infant and look up multiplayer / LAN / hotseat / split screen on wikipedia.

That's why one should be cautious, and not let paranoia rule over them. :)
(I know I know...easier said than done)

I think many more come here for low prices and the support rather than just drm free, tbh.....sadly, people like us are becoming more and more rare.

No sweat.....have a good one.

The "tools" in question here are called search engines. And the OP was corrected within a few hours of being started -- long before I showed up.

https://www.gog.com/forum/general/cyberpunk_and_micropayments/post6

Any more questions? lol

That's not a tool, it is an other source of information.

Also, in the post you provided, the OP was NOT corrected but provided with an answer from that source, which none of them were your contribution to this topic. Your initial post is way after that post so utterly useless to the discussion.

To sum it up, the OP asked a valid question and received some solid answers while your contribution to the discussion is less than ZERO.

So my question remains unanswered. Why criticize someone for something you were not capable of doing yourself?

To be fair, he does have somewhat of a point on one aspect....one should always try doing what they suggest others to do and set a good example(in this case posting corrections) whenever possible.

Lead by example, as they say.....:)

That was his point, not mine, and a rather pointless point as the OP was corrected long before I showed up. My point is the OP has a habit of posting dubious links, in this case expecting someone else to determine it's veracity.

If you're lonely, start a conversation thread.

Fair enough....I was just musing in general and offering some common sense advice just to offer it. :)

I did....not many replied. o.0

You said it takes a few minutes to test a source.

You failed to deliver that promise.

Hehe. I will really enjoy reading your reply explaining HOW this is being delusional and feverish. But this time please at least try to show some logic in your example or sources, which you keep failing delivering so far.