Dragonrb1: So GOG has become corporatized (in league with Steam). Which means it will become more for the money? Wonder what other changes will be coming other than the privacy rules. Will they be good for us, or them? Hmmm.
GOG, I like the way you are now, I hope this is not the beginning of the . . .
Dude... what?! Just seriously... what?!
How do you manage to exist in a make-believe reality that is so starkly different from the objective one? Don't you like get cognitive dissonances from hell?
1. GOG didn't become copropatized, they were a corporation from day one.
2. They wanted (and needed) to make a profit from day one. If they didn't they'd have closed down a long time ago.
3. How the fuck did you arrive at the conclusion that they are "in league with Steam." Like what exactly prompted your brain to make that connection? Them using Steam's public API to check what games people have there? Does that mean they are in league? Or did their agreements with DEVELOPERS and PUBLISHERS (not with Valve) to give people games for free mean they are in league? What is it?
If anything this move is the least financially motivated action ever. They could be selling you these games. But instead they went through the trouble of convincing the owners to GIVE them to you for free, just because you bought them on a competing service. They lost money on this. To provide you a service. And yet you bitch and come up with delusional accusations.
Why do I only meet these people now, and not 15 years ago when I was in college and actually needed them for case studies for my psychology classes.
/facepalm x3