It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
ElTerprise: Okay. Good point. Seems like the forum is really getting infected by the Steam forums disease...
avatar
PalioDeMonte: But I tend not to blame galaxy and the other technical changes for this. I think most of these idiots were brought here by the TW3 launch and especially the nVidia promo. Don't think they'll stay for more than a month. Stay strong!
unless GOG keeps releasing more AAA titles... DRM free will get the new "shit" and stupid call of duty teenies will spread their wisdom and make selfies with their "DRM free games - Shirts, featuring Che Guevara" and write shit like "I'm such a rebel #GOG #Attention #retarded"
avatar
GhostwriterDoF: ...
avatar
ddickinson: I am not quite sure the officers were always that useful during the war. Many officers on all sides seemed unable to adjust to the new style of fighting. ...

I hope you have a nice day, and that the weather will be nice so that you can enjoy your walk.
Surely in the trenches, it was the individual soldiers that endured and overcame the horrible conditions to win the day.

If I remember correctly, Germany was the best equipped with large and small artillery and the industrial production to back up their forces. and tactically were strong with both offensive and defensive deployment, France was next being the most organized, except they were weak with their defensive tactic and strategies. All the other continental forces involved were conscripted armies, with 2 to 3 years of service, except for Britain, which had volunteer soldier that served for 7? year period, and had career officers, many that rose through the ranks.

<sigh> I can't remember what it was about the officer core of the BEF that stuck out for me to think of them, but I'll try to remember or look up some things later. :)
avatar
CarrionCrow: Hmm. I'm not feeling the full extent of your outrage. Maybe scream more, say what a piece of shit GOG is and how you'll never buy anything from here again since they're clearly robbing you.
(Assuming of course that the Humble version is cheaper. If GOG's cheaper, shift over to complaining about how expensive independent games are, and how other sites have better sales.)

Also, I'm laughing right now because I find dialogue railroading amusing.
Guy mentions a problem, I get the option of saying I don't care about it and that I'll get back to him in a few days when it's resolved, after which I am immediately railroaded into doing the quest anyway.
I think I'll just vent my anger by killing shit with an oversized sword.

So many games to do that with.
avatar
ddickinson: Done and done. With an extra big thank you for all your hard work providing feedback for the new changes. I just hope they at least read what you wrote and take it into consideration. But I guess this whole thing about wanting feedback could just be PR stuff to make it sound like they care. Hopefully not.

*big thank you wave (it would be a big hug, but I don't want to hurt your back)*
Before going all "screw you" on me, eh? I guess that's better than them going "la la la la la la la, I can't hear you" and then "screw you" on me.

I don't hold much hope, and will probably be left with "at least I tried". Worse case scenario, I'll ask GOG to buy me a fancy mobile device to use their site, it sure looks like it's designed for one. ;-)


avatar
madth3: Voted.

Some of the cosmetic things should be fixable with a simple script... I might give it a try on the weekend.
Curious - which things do you consider to be of cosmetic nature?


avatar
GhostwriterDoF: [...]

How's the weekend shaping up for you?
My weekend is out of shape. Probably just going to take it easy, to help my back.


Thanks to all who voted, we need as many votes as possible, and hope you all have a nice weekend planned.


EDIT: typos
Post edited May 15, 2015 by HypersomniacLive
avatar
GhostwriterDoF: Surely in the trenches, it was the individual soldiers that endured and overcame the horrible conditions to win the day.

If I remember correctly, Germany was the best equipped with large and small artillery and the industrial production to back up their forces. and tactically were strong with both offensive and defensive deployment, France was next being the most organized, except they were weak with their defensive tactic and strategies. All the other continental forces involved were conscripted armies, with 2 to 3 years of service, except for Britain, which had volunteer soldier that served for 7? year period, and had career officers, many that rose through the ranks.

<sigh> I can't remember what it was about the officer core of the BEF that stuck out for me to think of them, but I'll try to remember or look up some things later. :)
And the Allies had the Belgians!! XD (yes, I'm back)
avatar
GhostwriterDoF: Greetings! and welcome back. :)

<big but gentle healing hug>

I believe you, that you'll be alright but I'm still going to be concerned to hear about your ills (and other's too). Most of us have injuries (or illnesses) we've accumulated over time that nag us once in awhile, so we can relate to the aches and pains of others.
avatar
ddickinson: Good morning!

I am good, thank you. Just having a nice rest and some lunch before I get back to work.

How are you, have you had a nice day?

And have another quick fact, since you are the main one interested in my silly facts. :-)

First World War Short Fact #2:
A quick follow up to my previous fact about British soldiers and their marksmanship. During the war, the average British trained soldier could shoot (accurately and aimed, not just random shooting) 16 rounds a minute. That is less than 4 seconds to aim, shoot, and reload the breech (as the rifles were bolt-action, firing one round at a time).
The turks were lucky, the british had some incompetent officers at Gallipoli. I also think there was some racially motivated underestimation of the ottoman forces too.

Also, the ottomans had Sanders Pasha :D A german officer.
Post edited May 15, 2015 by Soccorro
avatar
GhostwriterDoF: Surely in the trenches, it was the individual soldiers that endured and overcame the horrible conditions to win the day.

If I remember correctly, Germany was the best equipped with large and small artillery and the industrial production to back up their forces. and tactically were strong with both offensive and defensive deployment, France was next being the most organized, except they were weak with their defensive tactic and strategies. All the other continental forces involved were conscripted armies, with 2 to 3 years of service, except for Britain, which had volunteer soldier that served for 7? year period, and had career officers, many that rose through the ranks.

<sigh> I can't remember what it was about the officer core of the BEF that stuck out for me to think of them, but I'll try to remember or look up some things later. :)
You were not wrong with your comments about the officers, I was just trying to point out that not all of them were good. There were of course officers who were wonderful, but there were also those who were not. British officers were indeed often career officers, hardened through many of the wars fought during those times of the British Empire. The British officer training academy has always been highly regarded, which is why many nations still send their higher ups (military and royalty) to the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst. It was often the discipline and dedication to duty that made all the difference. As I mentioned earlier, the British army, especially in those days, relied more on the skills of their soldiers and officers, rather than numbers (mainly because we are an Island Kingdom, and could not field the numbers some of the other nations could).
Looks like GOG's working on stuff. Last time my game count was at 795, now it's at 799.
I thought everything had been unbundled already.
avatar
ddickinson: You were not wrong with your comments about the officers, I was just trying to point out that not all of them were good. There were of course officers who were wonderful, but there were also those who were not. British officers were indeed often career officers, hardened through many of the wars fought during those times of the British Empire. The British officer training academy has always been highly regarded, which is why many nations still send their higher ups (military and royalty) to the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst. It was often the discipline and dedication to duty that made all the difference. As I mentioned earlier, the British army, especially in those days, relied more on the skills of their soldiers and officers, rather than numbers (mainly because we are an Island Kingdom, and could not field the numbers some of the other nations could).
Onee-chan,can I hug you again?
How's the shoulder? How work and your day?
avatar
Soccorro: The turks were lucky, the british had some incompetent officers at Gallipoli. I also think there was some racially motivated underestimation of the ottoman forces too.
Again, it goes down to them being used to a different style of warfare. The First World War was the dawn of the modern era of warfare, with the introduction of things like tanks and military aircraft. You only have to look how the Ottomans would mess up to see my point about all sides finding it difficult to adapt.

For example, the first confrontation between Britain and Germany was a cavalry charge between two mounted divisions. In fact, and I can't remember the actual battle, but during the end of the war, the British led the last ever successful cavalry charge, against the Ottomans. The fact they still fought with horses, sabres, lances, and cavalry charges shows just how mixed the fighting styles of the war was.

Also remember that the British in those regions were often ill equipped and relied on colonial militia to bolster their numbers, and unfortunately these militia forces were not as well trained and would flee or turn traitor.
avatar
CarrionCrow: Looks like GOG's working on stuff. Last time my game count was at 795, now it's at 799.
I thought everything had been unbundled already.
They unbundled the Alone in the Dark pack.Now we can download AitD 2 and 3 without going through the extras.
avatar
CarrionCrow: Looks like GOG's working on stuff. Last time my game count was at 795, now it's at 799.
I thought everything had been unbundled already.
Maybe to thank you for creating this wonderful thread, they have given you four new games. :-)

avatar
l0rdtr3k: Onee-chan,can I hug you again?
How's the shoulder? How work and your day?
Why onee-chan? I did not even really understand what senpai meant, but why is it now onee-chan?

My shoulder is doing a lot better, thank you. My day is going well, and I am just about to get back to some more physical work so I will be offline for a while.
avatar
CarrionCrow: Looks like GOG's working on stuff. Last time my game count was at 795, now it's at 799.
I thought everything had been unbundled already.
avatar
l0rdtr3k: They unbundled the Alone in the Dark pack.Now we can download AitD 2 and 3 without going through the extras.
And now I have 3 entries for Earth 2150 rather than 1, which would account for my number being higher.
Thank you for the info. =)
avatar
ddickinson: Maybe to thank you for creating this wonderful thread, they have given you four new games. :-)

Why onee-chan? I did not even really understand what senpai meant, but why is it now onee-chan?

My shoulder is doing a lot better, thank you. My day is going well, and I am just about to get back to some more physical work so I will be offline for a while.
I'm your onii-sama and you're my onee-chan.
The senpai was because I respect you alot but I'm older than you here on GOG.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Before going all "screw you" on me, eh? I guess that's better than them going "la la la la la la la, I can't hear you" and the "screw you" on me.

I don't hold much hope, and will probably be left with "at least I tried". Worse case scenario, I'll ask GOG to buy me a fancy mobile device to user their site, it sure looks like it's designed for one. ;-)
I often use my tablet to view the site while I am at work, as I am out in the fields and use the cell signal. From my experience, the site is slow, and quite annoying to navigate on a mobile device. I prefer the PC site so much better, even if it is starting to look like a mobile site.

avatar
l0rdtr3k: I'm your onii-sama and you're my onee-chan.
The senpai was because I respect you alot but I'm older than you here on GOG.
So what do they all mean?

Why not use Brazilian words in stead of Japanese?
Post edited May 15, 2015 by ddickinson