adaliabooks: Yeah, it was great.
Sounds like you've had a very nice time, glad you managed to get some sleep :)
You can say that again.. I didn't realise the whole thing was driven by some nutjobs who wanted to portray him as a kind and goodly king (which fair enough might have been the case, it's hard to know). The woman who ran the dig seemed more like some kind of weird groupie than a historian...
But the fact they were able to find and identify him is pretty cool.
I agree it was impressive how they found him, but the whole handling of it was appalling. The Labour government who granted them permission to look should have never given the University control of the body. He is a King, and should have been buried where he wished, or at least alongside previous monarchs. Not in a gimmicky tomb to bring in temporary tourism for a bunch of idiots at a University desperate for recognition.
As for his character as a King or human being, remember that much of the history we have about him comes from the Tudors, his enemies. I'm not saying he was a saint, or that he was not the monster some say he was, but with things like this, you have to take things with a pinch of salt. History, as always, is written by the victors, and the Tudors would have used this opportunity to disgrace their enemy and blame him for actions the Tudors could have done (such as the Tudors allegedly being behind killing Edward V and Prince Richard, Duke of York. Again, no proof, just lots of theories.)