FoxySage: Heartstone isn't "pay-to-win". It is "pay-for-convenience". Big difference. If you're skilled enough you can get to legend ranks with only the basic cards and you can get a lot of gold from daily quests/arena wins to get the rarer and better cards. (Also requires a bit of luck to get legendaries in boosters too)
Really isn't that hard of a game to win and have fun with.
How does Mortal Kombat plays compared to Tekken or Skullgirls though? Those are my only comparisons for fighting games. Never played Soul Calibur and i haven't played any Street Fighter games since the Amiga, so hard to compare it to that. XD
CarrionCrow: When I played it, if you wanted to do ranked play, you needed a whole lot more high-end cards. They put gold acquisition via gameplay to a broken crawl while rolling out the (big surprise) get more cards for real money angle.
No surprise there, they got as many people hooked as possible, then brought out the microtransactions.
Gotta LOVE the modern games industry.
If you enjoy it, that's great. To me, it was just another company wanting to nickel and dime me into the ground.
Deleted it, deleted Battle.net, and unless I run out of other games to buy so I end up getting Starcraft 1 on disc from Amazon, not touching their stuff again.
I don't know when you played Heartstone but i played when it first came out of beta and had a vastly different experience from you. Took me about 2-3 months to get enough gold from arena wins/daily quests to have all the necessary good cards to make a decent deck from each class.
My first mage deck in ranked was pretty similar to
this deck (excluding the faceless manipulator) and i did quite well with it.
Most of the really good cards are common/rare which is easy to get, tbh.
But well, if you don't enjoy it that's okay. Not all games are for everyone. :)
j0ekerr: It's not the pay2win that annoys me. After all the original card games winning strategy was; "spend whole wads of money on booster packs until I get enough overpowered rares to beat the crap out of my oponnent... until the next expansion." It's just that... it's a freaking card game, why are you playing it on the computer? I honestly see no appeal. I'd rather sit down in front of the actual person and shuffle read cards.
Skullgirls is a very good 2D fighting game, Tekken is an excellent 3D one. The way you play both are completely different. Choose your favorite poison.
Because it is easier to find an opponent to play against than in real life? Especially when you don't have any friends that play card games and live in the middle of nowhere? Also, it is free and a pretty fun card game. *shrugs*
I know those are great games. That's why i asked about a comparison
to Mortal Kombat. Doesi t have responsive and fluent controls? Are combos relatively easy to use (and abuse)?