Kipper: When there is a will, there is a way.
Blizzard obviousbly makes decisions based on numbers.
What I've gathered, many (including me) wants WarCraft 4. What should we fo now?
We should let Blizzard see there still is a foothold for original WarCraft. How?
You guessed it.
Magic word: Crowd funding. That's the only way Blizzard will see there's a request for an actual WarCraft 4.
CarrionCrow: Petition? Maybe. Help to crowd fund a game from a company that has hundreds of millions (if not billions) of dollars when good games are being made by small studios with a fraction of the resources? No fucking way.
If that gets me WC4, so be it.
On a serious note, I was merely referring to the obvious fact that there is a market for WarCraft 4 RTS, as shown with that ominous crofd funding. Not that Blizzard ever actually would need it.
Should it ever go to that seriously, I'm the first to throw €50 for a copy when its ready. And I think I'm not the only one.
monkeydelarge: This is great news unless Warcraft 4 ends up being a MOBA or something similar.
zeroxxx: MOBA is HotS. WC stays as RTS.
As it always should have. But well, Blizzard needs to stop making these add-ons for the abomination known as Wow. Lets face it StarCraft 2 already showed us there is a market for RTS with a multiplayer.