It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
HunchBluntley: "Complot"?
Yes, it exists and has a proper definition.
GOG must not believe it worth their time (because time = money) to keep testing on XP. It's up to you if you want to continue buying here or not.
avatar
HunchBluntley: "Complot"?
avatar
JudasIscariot: Yes, it exists and has a proper definition.
Huh. I'd never heard of it. Though the English Wiktionary entry notes that it's "archaic", and, if the quotations on that page are anything to go by, it hasn't really been popular (if it ever was) since the 16th or 17th century, so that's probably why. :P
I just assumed it was either a translation error, or one of those oddball words that some conspiracy theorists like to make up and pass around their subculture. ;)
Thanks.
avatar
Themken: Probably their way of saying that their support for it is OVER.
avatar
Vissavald: Well, if so I think this way is wrong one, sorry. Just put a big sticky announcement somewhere aroung the main page, stating "We don't provide support for WinXP-running games anymore" or something like that.
If you're getting online on an XP machine, you are not very bright.
avatar
Vissavald: I understand your apology of GOG :)

But I tell about games pages that had "WinXP" sysreqs noted and about games that had been already tested on XP by GOG stuff. These games DO RUN and will EVER RUN on WinXP. it's all about changing the info on the appropriate game pages, deleting XP mention from them. I don't think it's fair.
In order to claim your product works on a given platform, you need to be able to test on that platform with an installation that can act as a solid reliable reference point.

For a platform that is still supported, it's "easy". You get the latest most patched up version of that platform and you test on that.

For a platform that is no longer supported, there is not standard anymore. The provider will not give you the latest version of the platform so there is no longer any reference point (and without the remote auto-updating, manually setting up what is hopefully the latest version before they pulled the plug can be a pain in the neck too and lets not get into the details of telling a customer to upgrade to that version...).

Really, the only way they could possibly support Windows XP for their games going forward would be to acquire the rights to Windows XP and maintain/distribute it themselves and that just won't happen.

Anyways, you got to update your OS once in a while. Things change (hardware and also software with regard to what it needs from an OS) and OSes need to evolve to accommodate those changes. If you don't like paying 100$+ every couple of years to upgrade Windows, switch to Linux (you'll still have to upgrade every couple of years, but it will be free of charge).
Post edited May 01, 2017 by Magnitus
low rated
Typical goggers,have an opinion and down vote the OP.Can't have an honest opinion in this place.
avatar
Tauto: Typical goggers,have an opinion and down vote the OP.Can't have an honest opinion in this place.
Not a fan of downvoting myself (the only time I'd ever make use of it would be if I wanted to hide a downright obscene post) , but I do think his opinion was a bit strong so I can see why others would downvote him.

If he hadn't called pulling XP support a "complot" and used that as a jumping board to paint GOG as a bad service overall (an opinion that would definitely need to be elaborated more), I don't think he would have been downvoted.
avatar
HunchBluntley: Huh. I'd never heard of it. Though [url=https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/complot ]the English Wiktionary entry[/url] notes that it's "archaic", and, if the quotations on that page are anything to go by, it hasn't really been popular (if it ever was) since the 16th or 17th century, so that's probably why. :P
I just assumed it was either a translation error, or one of those oddball words that some conspiracy theorists like to make up and pass around their subculture. ;)
Thanks.
It is a perfectly cromulent word, it helps embiggen one's vernacular.
avatar
HunchBluntley: "Complot"?
avatar
JudasIscariot: Yes, it exists and has a proper definition.
It even exists in other languages. It’s Komplott in German, for example.
And it’s not so hard to derive its meaning if you know the meaning of plot.

Most people use a different Latin word for it nowadays: conspiracy ;)
Post edited May 01, 2017 by 4-vektor
avatar
Tauto: Typical goggers,have an opinion and down vote the OP.Can't have an honest opinion in this place.
avatar
Magnitus: Not a fan of downvoting myself (the only time I'd ever make use of it would be if I wanted to hide a downright obscene post) , but I do think his opinion was a bit strong so I can see why others would downvote him.

If he hadn't called pulling XP support a "complot" and used that as a jumping board to paint GOG as a bad service overall (an opinion that would definitely need to be elaborated more), I don't think he would have been downvoted.
Maybe a little bit but a hell of a lot game developers kick old O.S's in the teeth far too early.And I'll bet there is still millions using the (best of the rest) XP.
avatar
HunchBluntley: Huh. I'd never heard of it. Though the English Wiktionary entry notes that it's "archaic", and, if the quotations on that page are anything to go by, it hasn't really been popular (if it ever was) since the 16th or 17th century, so that's probably why. :P
I just assumed it was either a translation error, or one of those oddball words that some conspiracy theorists like to make up and pass around their subculture. ;)
Thanks.
Yep, it's a french word, when french language was still used in the world of diplomacy.
avatar
anothername: I think its more of an "we don't test it there anymore so we cannot promote in good conscience" than them actually not working.
Besides that GOG also has classics within their catalogue, but going on this "new" mentality it is furthermore the way like REMASTERED running on modern system. Turok 2 anyone? Yes, some enhancements are nice but only running on a 64bit-system? But hey: Forget about everything else and older games must have an enhancement in the future. GOG seems to forget about their roots, more and more. And they will forget their other principles like DRM-free!
I don't think it was mentioned yet that if XP was listed as supported you would be eligible for a refund if you failed to get it running on your outdated system, but not before support has wasted hours trying to reproduce your obscure issue and help you.

Similarly they only list like two linux distros as supported, even though the linux games probably work just fine on most of them. And they don't give a peep about all those games that work on linux with wine. If they work, great, but they take no responsibility over it when they don't.
avatar
blotunga: Besides there are better alternatives out there than XP.
Name at least 3 these "alternatives"...
Post edited May 01, 2017 by SpecShadow
avatar
blotunga: Besides there are better alternatives out there than XP.
avatar
SpecShadow: Name at least 3 these "alternatives"...
Pretty much any OS that hasn't reached EOL.