eldav80: Thanks, but the 1650 super is far too expensive, about 250 euro, will think about the 6400, i mostly play older games. thanks
Dark_art_: I almost bought a Rx6400 for my nephew recently, cause he has a very old card and his Small Form Factor pc has been upgraded in every other way. What made not buying the card is that on older systems, it's hardly faster than a 1050Ti and the lack of video encoder severly limits his "multitasking" ability.
Link for a somewhat trusty review of the Rx6400 comparing to the 1050Ti The Rx6400 is indeed a good GPU on paper, and on a low profile variant is pretty much the only affordable choice. The thing is, is an worthy upgrade from a 1050Ti for older games? You'll decide and wish you the best, one way or another :)
JAAHAS: Used 6GB 1060 cards can be bought for much less than that and don't seem to perform much worse than the 1650 super.
Dark_art_: Not everyone like to buy used stuff, but for those who like to take the risk (yeah, mining...), at least my country, the GTX 1660/Super/Ti are by far the best GPU deals at the moment. They are selling for roughly the same price as 1060's and 1650's.
Hmm.. you are right it is just a small performance upgrade from 1050 ti on pcie 3, Pricewise the rx 6600 seems to outperform 1660 s on pcie 3, just does that card have win 7 support, too expensive to risk it, mayby the rx 6500 under 200 seem to be a lesser risk. thanks for the 6400 info.