It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
high rated
I'm getting very mixed signals here - I don't mean to talk about moderation, but it's just that people have been banned for less than what has been posted in this thread already. For weeks in some cases. And it was solely due to going political off-topic, against the Code of Conduct, even though they remained civil. And seeing as this topic and thread is about 90% political, and 10% gaming related, you will understand my confusion.

I'm getting very mixed signals here and am extremely wary of posting anything concrete, despite wanting to participate in the discussion. More than just being curious of the psychology of conspiracy theorists, which is quite fascinating in its own right.

But yeah. Don't want to wake up on Monday to see that half the forum posters are banned for a month. And that goes for both sides of the arguers. People bait with these threads during the weekends when mods are sleeping, and then mass report participants.

In case you weren't aware people. Be careful out there :)
high rated
avatar
scheroky: The thread is heading in the wrong direction. I wanted to point out that CD Project is following Ubisoft's path. If they want DEI in games, let them give me the option to turn it off in games. Let them release DLC with woke or LGBT and use that money to hire activists. I occasionally buy games on Steam and Ubisoft, and I want GOG to develop. I belong to the minority that will vote with their wallet, so I probably don't count for such a company.
I am still surprised that PiS allowed Blackrock to control CD Projekt with ESG. With your current rainbow flag loving government there is not hope of change. You should support the Konfederacja to prevent the rise of a woke cult in your country.


avatar
scheroky: The thread is heading in the wrong direction. I wanted to point out that CD Project is following Ubisoft's path. If they want DEI in games, let them give me the option to turn it off in games. Let them release DLC with woke or LGBT and use that money to hire activists. I occasionally buy games on Steam and Ubisoft, and I want GOG to develop. I belong to the minority that will vote with their wallet, so I probably don't count for such a company.
avatar
BanditKeith2: Other then'' Eruwan''and what seems more like a ''troll account '' given the user name ''DownwithWokesters'' its been going fairly okay sense that mod on the first page stepped in..
The only troll in this thread is you. Shut up!

avatar
Vainamoinen: Diversity "checklists", broad 'positive' stereotypes, flat and token characters, tolerance sermons, and wildly exaggerated victim roles ('Potter plots') will happen when authors are unaware of the lived reality of women, POC and LGBTQ+. To consult with minorities and the minoritized, that's a great idea and long overdue. Yet a lot of people who have taken a balanced stance on the illness in the past are now raging against the possible cure. Some are even blaming everything they think is wrong on a single teensy consulting firm with precious little input in precious few games. But it's even worse than that: we've already had several threads on this very forum that were exclusively about hounding down completely unrelated people working in the game industry, just for finding merit in what SBI is doing. Respectfully and reverently, moderation can not possibly twoside this issue.
You sound like a preacher of a deluded cult. Shut up wokester!
high rated
avatar
idbeholdME: A follow-up to my previous post:

Speak of the devil, HeelvsBabyface comes up with a video illustrating a great potential example, of how the source problem of ESG might ultimately end up leading into a steady overall decline. Link is to the start of the example, though I can recommend the full video:
https://youtu.be/4LZAoRnj4Xc?si=xIekLYW22wDboYyB&t=469

Also closely related to the so called "competency crisis".

EDIT:
This part from 15:02 - 15:21 perfectly sums up my previous point of the fight between catering to customers vs investors: https://youtu.be/4LZAoRnj4Xc?si=OGzgv4_6TZlW1U7j&t=902
Awful people make awful video games, it's simple as that.

If you employ awful or incompetent or ideologically biased people that cannot keep their beliefs separate and out of the games they're making you will end up with awful games.

Games that, for example despite being based in and built upon very specific and regionally contained and established lore and tradition(al values) and drawing their strength and USPs from that all of sudden need to be more "inclusive", "diverse" and "progressive" and appealing to a "modern audience" that time and time again has proven to be non-existent.

Ending up with:
- disproportionate if not completely unrealistic numbers of NPCs of non-European ethnicities milling about in a low fantasy world that while being fictional is still explicitly modelled after medieval Europe where non-white, so called people of colour have been virtually non-existent
- characters being reduced to and/or identifying/expressing themselves primarily via their sexuality or sex, as if their lives depend on it
- hiding or downright removing scientific facts like male and female sex, replacing it with "body type A" and "body type B" during character creation
- "forcing behaviours" via introducing compulsory pronoun usage, which again, makes no sense in a low fantasy world explicitly modelled after medieval Europe whatsoever
- etc.

What game(s) I'm talking about, you ask?

Witcher 4 (5 and 6), IF this praying to and doing the bidding of the DEI/ESG/BRIDGE overlords isn't stopped rather sooner than later.
high rated
avatar
idbeholdME: A follow-up to my previous post:

Speak of the devil, HeelvsBabyface comes up with a video illustrating a great potential example, of how the source problem of ESG might ultimately end up leading into a steady overall decline. Link is to the start of the example, though I can recommend the full video:
https://youtu.be/4LZAoRnj4Xc?si=xIekLYW22wDboYyB&t=469

Also closely related to the so called "competency crisis".

EDIT:
This part from 15:02 - 15:21 perfectly sums up my previous point of the fight between catering to customers vs investors: https://youtu.be/4LZAoRnj4Xc?si=OGzgv4_6TZlW1U7j&t=902
avatar
ortewor: Awful people make awful video games, it's simple as that.

If you employ awful or incompetent or ideologically biased people that cannot keep their beliefs separate and out of the games they're making you will end up with awful games.

Games that, for example despite being based in and built upon very specific and regionally contained and established lore and tradition(al values) and drawing their strength and USPs from that all of sudden need to be more "inclusive", "diverse" and "progressive" and appealing to a "modern audience" that time and time again has proven to be non-existent.

Ending up with:
- disproportionate if not completely unrealistic numbers of NPCs of non-European ethnicities milling about in a low fantasy world that while being fictional is still explicitly modelled after medieval Europe where non-white, so called people of colour have been virtually non-existent
- characters being reduced to and/or identifying/expressing themselves primarily via their sexuality or sex, as if their lives depend on it
- hiding or downright removing scientific facts like male and female sex, replacing it with "body type A" and "body type B" during character creation
- "forcing behaviours" via introducing compulsory pronoun usage, which again, makes no sense in a low fantasy world explicitly modelled after medieval Europe whatsoever
- etc.

What game(s) I'm talking about, you ask?

Witcher 4 (5 and 6), IF this praying to and doing the bidding of the DEI/ESG/BRIDGE overlords isn't stopped rather sooner than later.
You don't want to play a non-binary Geraldine of Rivia?

Right on. The woke cult needs to be stopped.
high rated
One of the many reasons the woke cult are evil is their false-flag garbage, where they larp as the villains from their deranged imaginations and mix right-wing talking points with Nazi bullshit like blaming Jews for everything and waving swastikas. A classic Scooby-Doo mask-pull reveals them for the authoritarian sub-humans they really are.
high rated
avatar
rojimboo: But yeah. Don't want to wake up on Monday to see that half the forum posters are banned for a month. And that goes for both sides of the arguers. People bait with these threads during the weekends when mods are sleeping, and then mass report participants.
I've literally gone through 80 iterations of that last post to get even the faintest hint of the political, the abrasive, and the insulting out of it. Took me no less than an hour. But I've said my piece and I don't think I have anything to add. I think it's possible to have an actually respectful discussion of Star Wars Outlaws, of Rings of Power, of the Concord failure. I don't think it's possible to have the same kind of discussion about Sweet Baby Inc. – nobody here, myself included, even knows what they're doing.
high rated
avatar
idbeholdME: A follow-up to my previous post:

Speak of the devil, HeelvsBabyface comes up with a video illustrating a great potential example, of how the source problem of ESG might ultimately end up leading into a steady overall decline. Link is to the start of the example, though I can recommend the full video:
https://youtu.be/4LZAoRnj4Xc?si=xIekLYW22wDboYyB&t=469

Also closely related to the so called "competency crisis".

EDIT:
This part from 15:02 - 15:21 perfectly sums up my previous point of the fight between catering to customers vs investors: https://youtu.be/4LZAoRnj4Xc?si=OGzgv4_6TZlW1U7j&t=902
avatar
ortewor: Awful people make awful video games, it's simple as that.

If you employ awful or incompetent or ideologically biased people that cannot keep their beliefs separate and out of the games they're making you will end up with awful games.

Games that, for example despite being based in and built upon very specific and regionally contained and established lore and tradition(al values) and drawing their strength and USPs from that all of sudden need to be more "inclusive", "diverse" and "progressive" and appealing to a "modern audience" that time and time again has proven to be non-existent.

Ending up with:
- disproportionate if not completely unrealistic numbers of NPCs of non-European ethnicities milling about in a low fantasy world that while being fictional is still explicitly modelled after medieval Europe where non-white, so called people of colour have been virtually non-existent
- characters being reduced to and/or identifying/expressing themselves primarily via their sexuality or sex, as if their lives depend on it
- hiding or downright removing scientific facts like male and female sex, replacing it with "body type A" and "body type B" during character creation
- "forcing behaviours" via introducing compulsory pronoun usage, which again, makes no sense in a low fantasy world explicitly modelled after medieval Europe whatsoever
- etc.

What game(s) I'm talking about, you ask?

Witcher 4 (5 and 6), IF this praying to and doing the bidding of the DEI/ESG/BRIDGE overlords isn't stopped rather sooner than later.
The funny thing is, CDPR Boston could/should(?) cram as much of the "woke bullshit" into Orion (a.k.a. the CP2077 follow-up) and it wouldn't necessarily be worse for it.
The world of Cyberpunk is supposed to be a futuristic hellhole dystopia of the American way of life after all.

If CDPR could keep all the modern, revisionistic "we don't care about the established lore and world and especially the older titles in the franchise" out of the Witcher AT LEAST, that'd be great and without a doubt appreciated by essentially everyone.

Let us have at least one franchise that's staying true to its roots (no matter how allegedly controversial or problematic they may be), does not throw away artistic or professional integrity and does not bend over backwards in compliance with DEI/ESG/BRIDGE.
Post edited October 13, 2024 by SCAwJos
high rated
Changing a certain politically charged avatar picture might be in order for the thread to remain open, by the way.

Don't come crying that "GOG closed the thread because GOG hates free speech" or something along those lines afterwards.
high rated
Well, I smell a lock tomorrow so either way, my final summation:

The "S" in the ESG is the source of all problems. It has no business being there and just comes off as preachy at best, escapism ruining at worst. While the merits of the "E" and G"" part could be reasonably debated on their positives and negatives, the "S" part will ultimately lead to nothing but dispute between the company adopting it and the end customer. Especially in the entertainment industry. Because unlike most other businesses, once the "S" starts seeping into the final product, it is quite apparent to see, usually accompanied by a drop in quality. And it will start seeping through, because the strive for ever higher ESG score is not a finite thing. Well, unless you literally reach the maximum rating, in which case, your goal is to maintain it. And the more you overdo it, the more pushback there is going to be, as evidenced by the past several years.

How can we force companies to start thinking about dropping the "S" part? By repeatedly making it clear that's not what the customers want. Closing our wallets and letting things bomb hard enough and often enough so the losses actually start equaling or outweighing the gains from going full ESG. It will seem like it does nothing at first, as many companies are all but taken over by those whose political views align with the "S" pillar, taking advantage of the favorable situation (watch the example vid I linked in my previous post). So the key is persistence. The market will correct itself eventually, but it won't happen overnight. We are already starting to see some initial "twitches" towards starting to cater to the customer again. The whole ESG/DEI/BRIDGE thing has an ever-growing negative connotation in the eyes of the general public. The first phase - them starting to hide the fact they follow these systems - is already here. It used to be flaunted everywhere as something universally positive. Not anymore, because companies are starting to realize, that is no longer the case. The key is to not rest on laurels, because hiding does not mean not still adopting it in the background (because again, investment money). So remain on guard and vote with your wallet. It will eventually become enough of an issue to force change. It's much harder to do for us than for the multi-trillion dollar holding companies, but not impossible.
Post edited October 13, 2024 by idbeholdME
high rated
A certain someone has just been reported.
high rated
avatar
SCAwJos: Changing a certain politically charged avatar picture might be in order for the thread to remain open, by the way.
Joined May 2024 with a mad provocative avatar. I wonder which of the commie trolls be tryin to get the thread shut.

avatar
SCAwJos: The funny thing is, CDPR Boston could/should(?) cram as much of the "woke bullshit" into Orion (a.k.a. the CP2077 follow-up) and it wouldn't necessarily be worse for it.
The world of Cyberpunk is supposed to be a futuristic hellhole dystopia of the American way of life after all.
Facts, shove that shit into the next Cyberpunk. It would fit perfect, fr fr
Post edited October 13, 2024 by WideLoader69b
high rated
avatar
SCAwJos: Changing a certain politically charged avatar picture might be in order for the thread to remain open, by the way.
Comes back to what I said earlier - it would be just like the GOG moderators to lock a thread because one user is using a swastika for their avatar. Despite the fact it would do nothing whatsoever to punish the actual user.
high rated
Now, can we stop looking for conspiracy theories and go back to posting cool gaming stuff?
high rated
Pheace, do you realize how much overlap there is?
high rated
Labelling shit as conspiracy theory indicates the speaker has no leg to stand on. The safe haven of weak minds is all it be.
avatar
Time4Tea: it would be just like the GOG moderators to lock a thread because one user is using a swastika for their avatar.
Facts. Ok seems they changed they avatar so maybe the thread will stay open.
Post edited October 14, 2024 by WideLoader69b