It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussionA Solemn Pledge of Abstinence(281 posts)(281 posts)
(281 posts)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
10
15
19
This is my favourite topic
Posted April 08, 2016
low rated
avatar
dtgreene: Better not be called "brofist".
avatar
Atlantico: Bring gender issues into this thread. I dare you.
I wasn't the one who brought up the term.
Posted April 08, 2016
How about tittyslap? Both men and women have tits.
Posted April 08, 2016
avatar
sunshinecorp: Nothing is exclusionary. You're making things exclusionary by saying they are. You just want to have yet another argument about gender. And I'm falling for it. *sigh* I want a term like brofist because it implies solidarity. Not gender. But go on, stay angry at the world for using "male dominant" words. See if I care. :P
avatar
dtgreene: It is enough to exclude me, therefore it is exclusionary.

You should pick a different term that implies solidarity and is not gendered.
I "should"? Well, you shouldn't tell people what to do.
Posted April 08, 2016
low rated
avatar
sunshinecorp: Then you don't understand Dudeism. :P Even if you put it in quotes. Or rather, especially when you use quotes.
avatar
Tauto: Your right,but who gives a stuff as I don't.Just wanted to get dude into a post for dtgreene as it's a favorite for her/him.
What about sunshinecorp's right?

Also, if you are only mentioning, rather than using, a word, you should put it in quotes. (Example: "dude" has 4 letters.)

(My question in this post is a joke about a grammar mistake you made.)
avatar
dtgreene: It is enough to exclude me, therefore it is exclusionary.

You should pick a different term that implies solidarity and is not gendered.
avatar
sunshinecorp: I "should"? Well, you shouldn't tell people what to do.
Why knot?

(Waits for someone to [redacted])
Post edited April 08, 2016 by dtgreene
Posted April 08, 2016
high rated
avatar
CARRiON.FLOWERS: How about tittyslap? Both men and women have tits.
And some men have larger tits than some women.
avatar
dtgreene: Why knot?
Dude. Because it's not bro-like, man.
Post edited April 08, 2016 by sunshinecorp
Posted April 09, 2016
low rated
avatar
dtgreene: Why knot?
avatar
sunshinecorp: Dude. Because it's not bro-like, man.
Excuse me, but please don't call me "dude" or "man".
Posted April 09, 2016
high rated
avatar
sunshinecorp: Dude. Because it's not bro-like, man.
avatar
dtgreene: Excuse me, but please don't call me "dude" or "man".
Alright bro, sorry.
Posted April 09, 2016
low rated
avatar
Tauto: Your right,but who gives a stuff as I don't.Just wanted to get dude into a post for dtgreene as it's a favorite for her/him.
avatar
dtgreene: What about sunshinecorp's right?

Also, if you are only mentioning, rather than using, a word, you should put it in quotes. (Example: "dude" has 4 letters.)

(My question in this post is a joke about a grammar mistake you made.)
avatar
sunshinecorp: I "should"? Well, you shouldn't tell people what to do.
avatar
dtgreene: Why knot?

(Waits for someone to [redacted])
I don't really care to be corrected by grammar nuts,as long as it's understandable by the receiver.At least I'm a long way off writing and spelling like snowkatt.
Posted April 09, 2016
avatar
dtgreene: What about sunshinecorp's right?

Also, if you are only mentioning, rather than using, a word, you should put it in quotes. (Example: "dude" has 4 letters.)

(My question in this post is a joke about a grammar mistake you made.)

Why knot?

(Waits for someone to [redacted])
avatar
Tauto: I don't really care to be corrected by grammar nuts,as long as it's understandable by the receiver.At least I'm a long way off writing and spelling like snowkatt.
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0149885 is a quite interesting read about how grammar nazis are unhappy people.
Posted April 09, 2016
low rated
avatar
dtgreene: Excuse me, but please don't call me "dude" or "man".
avatar
sunshinecorp: Alright bro, sorry.
It shouldn't surprise you, but I don't like being called "bro", either,
Posted April 09, 2016
high rated
avatar
sunshinecorp: Alright bro, sorry.
avatar
dtgreene: It shouldn't surprise you, but I don't like being called "bro", either,
Aw my mistake, brother. You hate abbreviations, right?
Posted April 09, 2016
low rated
avatar
dtgreene: It shouldn't surprise you, but I don't like being called "bro", either,
avatar
sunshinecorp: Aw my mistake, brother. You hate abbreviations, right?
I don't like being called "brother", either.
Posted April 09, 2016
high rated
avatar
sunshinecorp: Aw my mistake, brother. You hate abbreviations, right?
avatar
dtgreene: I don't like being called "brother", either.
Sorry guy!
I can do this AAAAAALL night long...
Posted April 09, 2016
high rated
avatar
dtgreene: It is enough to exclude me, therefore it is exclusionary.

You should pick a different term that implies solidarity and is not gendered.
You have an uncanny nack for being annoying. I don't know if you're doing it on purpose, but it's like you're trying to be an avatar for everything that's annoying people about "gender issues" (or whatever you want to call it). We could make a drinking game out of your "don't call me Shirley" posts, and I seriously don't think it's possible to start a thread you couldn't bring gender issues into at the flimsiest excuse.

And here's the crux of it- I'm not saying all this to insult you, and I'm not taking any sides in any gender debate you might like to have. I'm saying it in a desperate hope that you might actually realise how touchy, tedious and needlessly disruptive you are, and try to change before people stop being mildly annoyed by you, and start really hating you.
Post edited April 09, 2016 by Breja
Posted April 09, 2016
high rated
avatar
dtgreene: It is enough to exclude me, therefore it is exclusionary.

You should pick a different term that implies solidarity and is not gendered.
avatar
Breja: You have an uncanny nack for being annoying. I don't know if you're doing it on purpose, but it's like you're trying to be an avatar for everything that's annoying people about "gender issues" (or whatever you want to call it). We could make a drinking game out of your "don't call me Shirley" posts, and I seriously don't think it's possible to start a thready you couldn't bring gender issues into at the flimsiest excuse.

And here's the crux of it- I'm not saying all this to insult you, and I'm not taking any sides in any gender debate you might like to have. I'm saying it in a desperate hope that you might actually realise how touchy, tedious and needlessly disruptive you are, and try to change before people stop being mildly annoyed by you, and start really hating you.
Well said.
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
10
15
19
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussionA Solemn Pledge of Abstinence(281 posts)(281 posts)
(281 posts)